City Police still using Terror Act to bother photographers

On Thu, 13 May 2010 23:20:03 +0100, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2010 23:20:03 +0100, in rec.photo.equipment.35mm you wrote:

|
|Maybe if *you* had a brain, you would realise that property rights are
|a civil, not a criminal matter, and that it has nothing whatsoever to
|do with the police.
|

A photographer's *property release* has nothing to do with this concept of
property rights....

There is a fine line between Civil and criminal "matters" whether a
Civil Jury of 5, or a criminal jury of 6/12!

Everything in the Yookay, has something to do with the Police, in a
Police State ( random stop and search) of retired the mossad katsaas
surveillance world, where everyone has there own hardwired chip to the
grid....making them????Public Property??


|Unfortunately, the space between your ears appears to be vacant. ;-)


Ergo, you don't have real estate property, but an airhead would
give you a use for your lungs....


Nevertheless the (ACPO) Terrorism disclaimer made the
"photographer's police" terrorism collar somewhat a bit outrageous,
especially from a bunch of ******s and ******* they are.

--
Triad Productions-Fantalla®(tm)~EZine~ParaNovel
http://tarbitch.balder.prohosting. com
mirror http://triad.beam. at

Bob