If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 22:12:25 -0700, Annika1980 wrote:
Does "Paris Match" still exist and can anyone still shoot their covers? I haven't seen it in the UK for quite a few years. That is a pity because I liked it as the articles seemed better than almost all the competitors I read. -- Neil Reverse ‘a’ and ‘r’ Remove ‘l’ to get address. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
On 2013.06.04 01:12 , Annika1980 wrote:
Does "Paris Match" still exist and can anyone still shoot their covers? I'm sure if you plied Monaco, Nice, Cannes and Marseille in season you would capture something worthy of their consideration. -- "A Canadian is someone who knows how to have sex in a canoe." -Pierre Berton |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
In article , PeterN
wrote: let's see; You said "...people get their news online now for free, including both stills and video" they do. there is absolutely nothing incorrect about that. and that was in response to a silly comment that videos can't be printed unless they're in a flipbook format. people watch the videos online, because that's where the industry is going. I responded to that point and you tried to worm out of it by raising an irrelevant question. i'm not worming anything. you're the one who tried to spin it into something it wasn't because you like to argue, that being that you're doing the right thing by paying for any content you consume online, suggesting that anyone who consumes content for free is somehow ripping off the provider of the info. that's just bull****. Straw man. I never said any such thing. yes you did There are hundreds of thousands of people who pay for online content. and there are millions who don't. and not all of the sites who charge are successful at it. some shut down, leaving customers hanging. there are many legitimate sources of free content, both online and not. you have once again been proven wrong. Again, instead of discussing a point ,you turn to personal attack. that is not a personal attack. and the fact remains that newspapers are hurting because it's very difficult to monetize online content. people expect websites to be free. that's just how it is. And there is an rt to turning "free" websites into money. Some websites should have free access, but somewhere along the line, someone pays. free sites usually have ads. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
On 6/5/2013 5:18 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: let's see; You said "...people get their news online now for free, including both stills and video" they do. there is absolutely nothing incorrect about that. and that was in response to a silly comment that videos can't be printed unless they're in a flipbook format. people watch the videos online, because that's where the industry is going. I responded to that point and you tried to worm out of it by raising an irrelevant question. i'm not worming anything. you're the one who tried to spin it into something it wasn't because you like to argue, that being that you're doing the right thing by paying for any content you consume online, suggesting that anyone who consumes content for free is somehow ripping off the provider of the info. that's just bull****. Straw man. I never said any such thing. yes you did Show me, IN CONTEXT. There are hundreds of thousands of people who pay for online content. and there are millions who don't. So what is your point? and not all of the sites who charge are successful at it. some shut down, leaving customers hanging. there are many legitimate sources of free content, both online and not. you have once again been proven wrong. Again, instead of discussing a point ,you turn to personal attack. that is not a personal attack. and the fact remains that newspapers are hurting because it's very difficult to monetize online content. people expect websites to be free. that's just how it is. And there is an rt to turning "free" websites into money. Some websites should have free access, but somewhere along the line, someone pays. free sites usually have ads. Then they are not free. Someone is paying for them. -- PeterN |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
On 2013-05-31, Bowser wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/05...ff-photo-staff Short sighted, and stupid. Classic US bean-counter methodology. Same as hiring temps. No medical, no sick pay, no retirement, etc. Nothing new. Large corps --on their way to become corpse-- have been doing the exact same thing for decades. You want a REAL sign of the apocalypse!? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2JhpNbe2Io nb |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
Alan Browne wrote:
What's really horrible are all these amateur "How to" videos you find on YouTube. With rare exceptions they are badly planned, badly filmed, badly narrated and badly edited. If that's the only source you can get (and sometimes it is) .... well, you *could* have not any information at all. -Wolfgang |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
PeterN wrote:
i PAY for my digital online subscriptions, at least the ones I read regularly. So do most of my friends. We have an old fashioned philosophy that if you use something, you ought to pay for it. I regularly use air. Would you like a society that would cut off your air supply if you couldn't pay? (OTOH, unemployment would quickly fix itself that way.) -Wolfgang |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
On 6 Jun 2013 15:49:47 GMT, notbob wrote:
: On 2013-05-31, Bowser wrote: : http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/05...ff-photo-staff : : Short sighted, and stupid. : : Classic US bean-counter methodology. Same as hiring temps. No : medical, no sick pay, no retirement, etc. Nothing new. Large corps : --on their way to become corpse-- have been doing the exact same thing : for decades. : : You want a REAL sign of the apocalypse!? : : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2JhpNbe2Io Not bad. Too long and repetitive, but the singing was surprisingly good. Must have been made by music school students. Bob |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Another sign of the apocalypse
On 2013.06.06 11:49 , notbob wrote:
You want a REAL sign of the apocalypse!? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2JhpNbe2Io WONDERFUL! Just like a Broadway musical. Well done. Well edited. -- "A Canadian is someone who knows how to have sex in a canoe." -Pierre Berton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Today's Sign of the Apocalypse | Bowser | Digital Photography | 3 | April 4th 13 10:20 AM |
How to take photos of the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse??? | Lucas J. Riesau | Digital Photography | 13 | May 20th 07 10:12 PM |
==AFFILIATES WANTED==GET PAID $80 PER FREE SIGN UP~~$50 SIGN ON BONUS~~FREE TO JOIN== | miked | Digital Photography | 0 | February 17th 06 12:02 PM |
Polycarbonate linked to apocalypse | Steve Franklin | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | January 21st 06 03:19 AM |