Top Ten Digital SLRs

please give your comments for the top SLRs:
http://www.digitalcameras-plus.com/top-digital-slrs/

Scott W wrote:
wrote:
please give your comments for the top SLRs:
http://www.digitalcameras-plus.com/top-digital-slrs/


Have you used all 10 of these cameras or are you choosing just based on
what other people have said about the cameras?

Not only is he "going by" what others said, he copied
most of the content word-for-word. Starting with his
first paragraph, we find the text stolen from CNET:

These models offer the advanced features that
experienced shooters need, and all of them are
compatible with a wide range of interchangeable
lenses and accessories. Of course, they're
generally more expensive than point-and-shoot
cameras
http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-6501_7-111-102.html


His comments on the cameras are not his at all.
He's just another spammer.


--
--Bryan

On 15 Okt, 05:46, " wrote:
please give your comments for the top SLRs:http://www.digitalcameras-plus.com/top-digital-slrs/

Interesting page, that!

It includes the D-Lux 3, which isn't a DSLR by normal standards. It
also says it is 7.5Mpix, which is not true, at least to my knowledge.
moreover, it says it has an interchangeable lens, which I also do not
think is true.

To include the old 10D on such a list seems a bit remarkable. Even the
30D should perhaps not be there.

And no Nikon.

What did that person smoke, anyway?

P.

On 15 Okt, 10:53, I wrote:

It includes the D-Lux 3, which isn't a DSLR by normal standards.

I read it again, and sees that he wrote "Digilux 3", not "D-Lux 3". I
triggered on the picture which shows the D-Lux 3.

The Digilux does indeed have an interchanable lens, but still is not a
DSLR.

Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital...reflex_cameras

P.

wrote:
please give your comments for the top SLRs:
http://www.digitalcameras-plus.com/top-digital-slrs/


That looks like a vendor sponsered bull**** site to me.

Sorry.

--
Thomas T. Veldhouse

Ninety percent of the politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation.
-- Henry Kissinger

On Oct 15, 9:04 am, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
wrote:
please give your comments for the top SLRs:
http://www.digitalcameras-plus.com/top-digital-slrs/

That looks like a vendor sponsered bull**** site to me.

Sorry.

It probably is, but it's silly, too. How many of us have used enough
DSLRs to make a judgment as to which 10 are the best? A look at the
DSLRs listed on DPReview shows what a daunting job that kind of
selection would be for someone who doesn't test cameras for a living.

Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
wrote:
please give your comments for the top SLRs:
http://www.digitalcsssssssssssssssss...sssss sssssss


That looks like a vendor sponsered bull**** site to me.

Sorry.


Then do clip the URL....

==
--
john mcwilliams

wrote in message
ups.com...
please give your comments for the top SLRs:
http://www.digitalcameras-plus.com/top-digital-slrs/

LOL. Looks like whoever did that is very confused about the Leica D-Lux 3
and the Leica Digilux 3.
If you follow the link, the specs that are given are a mix of both. The
D-Lux is a 4x zoom 10MP ultracompact, while the Digilux is a 7.5MP DSLR.
Built in conjunction with Panasonic, the Digilux 3 is Leica's version of the
DMC-L1 - both built on the Olympus E330 platform.