If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR death-throws. Canon and Nikon
In article ,
RichA wrote: Yes, we know they still dominate professional photography, no question. But Canon's recent release of a $6000, 2kg pro model is probably going to be the last of that type. Nikon is releasing the D780 which is a replacement for the D750 which was a poor man's replacement for the truly Pro D700. Either one of these could be seen as the last of their class, in my opinion. Canon needs to up its mirrorless game as does Nikon to finally nail the DSLR coffin shut. thereby killing all the pros. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR death-throws. Canon and Nikon
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, nospam wrote:
thereby killing all the pros. Elaborate! How are "all the pros" alive today and why would they be killed? Adapting to new situations would be part of being "pro" in my book ... but I might be completely wrong about this. It might be the ability to whine about all the things not happened yet ... who know? / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR death-throws. Canon and Nikon
In article
alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.2001080203290.47337@cerebro. liukuma.net, Bud Spencer wrote: thereby killing all the pros. Elaborate! How are "all the pros" alive today and why would they be killed? read the post to which i responded. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR death-throws. Canon and Nikon
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, nospam wrote:
read the post to which i responded. Just like when you go tp the toilet and wonder "here it should be ... where is it?" while franticly hunt for the leaky bit ... which cannot be found. Once again you are just so full of your sameolsameol ... But don't worry. It's ok to wet your pants once in a while, you are not judged ... / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR death-throws. Canon and Nikon
In article
alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.2001082034450.52911@cerebro. liukuma.net, Bud Spencer wrote: read the post to which i responded. Just like when you go tp the toilet and wonder "here it should be ... where is it?" while franticly hunt for the leaky bit ... which cannot be found. Once again you are just so full of your sameolsameol ... But don't worry. It's ok to wet your pants once in a while, you are not judged ... that would be you. there was *no* ambiguity as to what was meant. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR death-throws. Canon and Nikon
In article , Incubus
wrote: Yes, we know they still dominate professional photography, no question. But Canon's recent release of a $6000, 2kg pro model is probably going to be the last of that type. Nikon is releasing the D780 which is a replacement for the D750 which was a poor man's replacement for the truly Pro D700. Either one of these could be seen as the last of their class, in my opinion. Canon needs to up its mirrorless game as does Nikon to finally nail the DSLR coffin shut. thereby killing all the pros. Even as a non-professional, the optical viewfinder is a huge advantage for me. Even though modern EVFs have less lag, I like to keep one eye in the viewfinder and one eye tracking what is about to come into view when I am shooting anything remotely action oriented. An EVF would be worse than useless for me. That is just one of the benefits of a DSLR. you could easily do that using an evf without any issue whatsoever. the problem with evf is latency. while it's quite good, it will never be as good as optical. simple physics. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR death-throws. Canon and Nikon
In nospam writes:
[snip] Even though modern EVFs have less lag, I like to keep one eye in the viewfinder and one eye tracking what is about to come into view when I am shooting anything remotely action oriented. An EVF would be worse than useless for me. That is just one of the benefits of a DSLR. you could easily do that using an evf without any issue whatsoever. the problem with evf is latency. while it's quite good, it will never be as good as optical. simple physics. On the other paw, there's a built in time delay factor involved with swinging the mirror out of the way. -- __________________________________________________ ___ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DSLR death coming? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 35 | July 4th 19 01:58 PM |
Death of the DSLR-TROLLS | Neil Harrington[_5_] | Digital Photography | 0 | September 6th 10 05:06 PM |
Death of the DSLR-TROLLS | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 0 | September 4th 10 05:35 PM |