If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Soon-to Be D70 User, From 300D
Well, I did it--I made a deal with a FM poster to buy his D70 from him, and
I'm selling my 300D. This is NOT to start a flame-war, I've read a ka-zillion posts and reviews on the respective cameras. I'm buying mainly because my 300D broke only a month after I bought it--yes I bought it used, but I did likewise with my CP5700 and it's humming along perfectly (as was the case with other Nikons I've owned)--and since I have a CP5700 and the Nikon View/Capture software a D70 "integrates" more that way. Why am I posting then? A few questions: (1) Will I miss mirror lockup much? I do like macro-shots a lot but I use the CP5700 more for those than I did the 300D, and never used slow-shutter speeds when macro shooting for the most part; after all, at a shutter speed of 1/15 second, any hand movement or movement from the wind blowing the plant would ruin the shot anyway. The "fanciest" zoom I see myself buying is the Sigma 70-300 APO Super Macro II; I'd LOVE VR glass but can't afford any of it. (Of course the Sigma will be equivalent to 450mm at the 300 setting.) Would I miss mirror lockup much here? How about if in the future I get (say) a 80-400 VR lens? (2) How often have you D70 users encoutered moiré? I hear shooting RAW helps a lot (I intend to shoot a lot of RAW as it is.) I've read various posts too on software that can remove it. (I do have Paint Shop Pro 8 but that's all.) (3) I've heard many a user bitch about the 300D's flash performance, even with flash-exposure compensation re-enabled via the hack. A pro friend of mine who's shot longer than I've been alive (I'm 36) has bitched endlessly about how hard it is to get good flash exposures with the 300D. I've heard likewise elsewhere too. I hear the D70's flash performance is far superior. True? And would you have to blow your wad on the SB-600/SB-800 to obtain decent performance, or would something like the Sunpak PZ5000AF or even (gasp) a Vivitar 283 be an adequate substitute until I can pony up for an SB-600/800? (4) The 300D is known for its "silky-smooth" ISO 100 images, but the D70 has great noise performance also. In my case, I am known to do 2-minute exposures trying to capture lightning storms. Such shots would HAVE to be done with NR turned off, so I wouldn't have to wait 2 more minutes for the next shot. Will the performance of the D70 do well there as opposed to "falling flat" compared to the 300D? LRH |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Ruf" wrote in message ... You are not going to be taking any macro shots like you did with the 5700 with any of these lenses. They don't allow you to focus close enough. I am totally aware of that. In the SLR world I am well aware that the way to go is a specialized macro lens. Also fwiw the 70-200 f/2.8 VR is a much better lens than the 80-400 f/5.6 VR if you read the reviews. Which reviews say this? Just curious. Also, what about the OTHER issues I brought up? LRH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Ruf wrote in
: You are not going to be taking any macro shots like you did with the 5700 with any of these lenses. They don't allow you to focus close enough. You can try diopters and such, but you really need another lens with close focus capability for this. Also fwiw the 70-200 f/2.8 VR is a much better lens than the 80-400 f/5.6 VR if you read the reviews. Personally I find a cheap prime lens (e.g. 50 mm) with extension tubes being an excellent choice for macro photo. Or even better, if you can afford, a macro lens. No need for zooms for macro. /Roland |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Ruf wrote in
: You are not going to be taking any macro shots like you did with the 5700 with any of these lenses. They don't allow you to focus close enough. You can try diopters and such, but you really need another lens with close focus capability for this. Also fwiw the 70-200 f/2.8 VR is a much better lens than the 80-400 f/5.6 VR if you read the reviews. Personally I find a cheap prime lens (e.g. 50 mm) with extension tubes being an excellent choice for macro photo. Or even better, if you can afford, a macro lens. No need for zooms for macro. /Roland |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry R Harrison Jr" wrote in message newsacFd.17750$c%.11181@okepread05... (2) How often have you D70 users encoutered moiré? I hear shooting RAW helps a lot (I intend to shoot a lot of RAW as it is.) I've read various posts too on software that can remove it. (I do have Paint Shop Pro 8 but that's all.) two times in 6.000 pictures. the last time was a jpeg fine shot of the chicago skyline and one of the buildings window front showed moire - shooting the same in raw DID indeed inprove the moire a lot. its a matter of resolution and math... (3) I've heard many a user bitch about the 300D's flash performance, even with flash-exposure compensation re-enabled via the hack. A pro friend of mine who's shot longer than I've been alive (I'm 36) has bitched endlessly about how hard it is to get good flash exposures with the 300D. I've heard likewise elsewhere too. I hear the D70's flash performance is far superior. True? And would you have to blow your wad on the SB-600/SB-800 to obtain decent performance, or would something like the Sunpak PZ5000AF or even (gasp) a Vivitar 283 be an adequate substitute until I can pony up for an SB-600/800? i am by no means a pro, but i am totally happy with my sb-600 on my d70. i bought it off overstock auctions brand new for 161 bucks - incl. shipping - about a month ago. the sb-800 wouldve cost' 100 more. sid |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
(2) How often have you D70 users encoutered moiré? I hear shooting RAW helps
a lot (I intend to shoot a lot of RAW as it is.) I've read various posts too on software that can remove it. (I do have Paint Shop Pro 8 but that's all.) My D70 just rolled over its 10,000th shot and I have yet to see any moire. And would you have to blow your wad on the SB-600/SB-800 to obtain decent performance, or would something like the Sunpak PZ5000AF or even (gasp) a Vivitar 283 be an adequate substitute until I can pony up for an SB-600/800? The sb-600/800 are so well tied to the D70 that it would be a waste of money to buy anything else. http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/sb600.htm I find that when I'm working in the street, the sb-600's "balance" mode with the D70's Program mode can do incredible fill flash. See my shots here http://www.nymetro.com/arts/articles/04/street_performers/gallery/7.htm and here http://www.nymetro.com/arts/articles/04/street_performers/gallery/3.htm I am known to do 2-minute exposures trying to capture lightning storms. Such shots would HAVE to be done with NR turned off, so I wouldn't have to wait 2 more minutes for the next shot. Will the performance of the D70 do well there as opposed to "falling flat" compared to the 300D? A friend does long-exposure night shots with his D70 (and also with his Canon 20D). Check them out here http://www.notraces.com/archives/000674.php, http://www.notraces.com/archives/000547.php, and archived here http://www.notraces.com/archives/cat_nikon_d70.php. But don't turn off NR. If I remember, it doesn't add that much time to the processing of the shot on a D70. -=-Joe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon 300d versus Canon Powershot S1 (or fuji s7000) | Peter Russell | Digital Photography | 6 | December 9th 04 08:39 AM |
Which wide angle lense for a 300D? | Bernard Carr | Digital Photography | 27 | October 30th 04 05:52 PM |
CANON stomps Nikon .... Again !!! | Annika1980 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 670 | October 24th 04 08:06 PM |
Problem with AF on 50mm f1.8 and 300D? | Rowan Crowe | Digital Photography | 9 | July 24th 04 04:39 AM |
Yet another 300d vs D70 post! | Rich Powell | Digital Photography | 18 | July 14th 04 05:37 PM |