Make all DSLRs with metal bodies, how would it hurt?

3. Costs would be higher, likely $800/ea. Which would mean some P&S
migrators, soccer moms, and certain other DSLRs buyers might be kept
away from them, thereby avoiding some of the dilution of photo quality
and the photo market we see today. Poor saps would be less likely to
contract their brothers to shoot their weddings for $200.00, thereby
saving the profession from some of the shame it is exposed to today.


jeeezus arrogant much , maybe we should vet our photos to you before buying
a dslr, check out out pbase or any of the photo forums - plenty of people
talking very good photo with the cheaper dslr.

bigoted **** - youre almost as annoying as that cock that keeps carrying on
about p+s camera's being better

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:10:04 +0800, "corks"

snip


bigoted **** - youre almost as annoying as that cock that keeps carrying on
about p+s camera's being better

Isn't it amazing? I wonder who's got the gun to his head, forcing him
to look at all those horrible photos that offend him so.