If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digital that "looks and feels" manual
What high-end digital cameras operate and feel most like traditional
manual cameras (controls in right place, held in a similar way). The Leica V-Lux (and the Panasonic "clone" of it, or from which it was cloned, whatever), seems close. They all seem too small, with push buttons controls and the viewfinder is a screen in the "wrong place." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Digital that "looks and feels" manual
Aaron Kuperman wrote:
What high-end digital cameras operate and feel most like traditional manual cameras (controls in right place, held in a similar way). The Leica V-Lux (and the Panasonic "clone" of it, or from which it was cloned, whatever), seems close. They all seem too small, with push buttons controls and the viewfinder is a screen in the "wrong place." The cameras that you mention above are not traditional "SLR" per say but advanced point and shoot cameras with pretty good (to damned good) lenses. Look at the D-SLR's. Most of them, including the lower end ones are fairly close to a traditional layout and use optical viewfinders via the usual prism (or mirror box) and mirror. The Maxxum 7D is exemplary in that respect. Of course it's film predecessor was exceptional for control location and handling in any case. The main difference is of course that Maxxum lenses do not have the aperture on the lens but rather control it from the body. Various other DSLR's are similarly "traditional" with some exceptions. Nikon have a mix of lenses, the "G" lenses for example do not have aperture rings, it is controlled on the body. Many of the DSLR's (and some of their film predecessors) have a position for the aperture ring on the lens to allow the body to "take over" the aperture (in manual, semi-auto and auto modes of various flavours). The best thing is of course to find those that suit you and to try them. Cheers, PS: -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Digital that "looks and feels" manual
On May 15, 12:02 pm, (Aaron Kuperman) wrote:
What high-end digital cameras operate and feel most like traditional manual cameras (controls in right place, held in a similar way). The Leica V-Lux (and the Panasonic "clone" of it, or from which it was cloned, whatever), seems close. They all seem too small, with push buttons controls and the viewfinder is a screen in the "wrong place." Just about any DSLR will probably be pretty much what you are looking for. There as still menus to deal with since a digital camera has a lot more options then a film camera does, but it will have the same type of view finder you are use to and zoom and focus in the same way. A number of cameras, like the 20D, have two knobs that when in full manual mode one adjusts the f/number and the other adjusts the shutter speed, however in other modes the knobs might be used for something else so they are not labeled as f/number and shutter speed, like you would find on a film camera. If you really, really want something that is as close to a film camera as you can get but still is a digital you can look at the Leica M8, not a camera I would buy but some people like it. You can see how the controls are laid out on a lot of camera at this site http://www.dpreview.com/ Scott |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Digital that "looks and feels" manual
Aaron Kuperman wrote:
What high-end digital cameras operate and feel most like traditional manual cameras (controls in right place, held in a similar way). The Leica V-Lux (and the Panasonic "clone" of it, or from which it was cloned, whatever), seems close. They all seem too small, with push buttons controls and the viewfinder is a screen in the "wrong place." Nikon D200 with 30-year-old lenses. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Digital that "looks and feels" manual
On May 16, 8:02 am, (Aaron Kuperman) wrote:
What high-end digital cameras operate and feel most like traditional manual cameras (controls in right place, held in a similar way). The Leica V-Lux (and the Panasonic "clone" of it, or from which it was cloned, whatever), seems close. They all seem too small, with push buttons controls and the viewfinder is a screen in the "wrong place." If you are committed to non-dslr and don't mind a lack of IS, look at the Fuji 9100/9600 perhaps? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Digital that "looks and feels" manual
Scott W writes:
If you really, really want something that is as close to a film camera as you can get but still is a digital you can look at the Leica M8, not a camera I would buy but some people like it. Or the Epson RD-1 rangefinder. Also accepts Leica M lenses and even has a film wind lever |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Friends are born, not made." !!!! By: "Henry Brooks Adams" | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | February 1st 07 02:25 PM |
How to insert the "modified time" attribute in "date taken" attrib in batch mode | ashjas | Digital Photography | 4 | November 8th 06 09:00 PM |
Is there a "Manual" Digital Camera, the equivalent of a Nikon FM2? | Stoatgobbler | Digital Photography | 22 | February 12th 06 06:09 PM |