If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
BTW - you've got some nice work in your galleries.
When I clicked on the direct picture links in your original post it told me I had to log in as you to view the image. But it let me view the gallery via the links at the top of the page. -- Doug Greenwald Keeper of the Bad Attitude "McWave" wrote in message ... Actually many casinos are very beautiful inside, such as Paris, Venetian, and New York New York. So it may be very common for tourists to take pictures inside, and casinos are not against this. For example, I have seen many photos about the lions in MGM. However, casinos might be really unwilling to see photos about people gambling, and they have the right to prevent such photos from being published online. Hope my understanding is correct. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you. I hide the photos about the gambling people, and other photos (most are scenic ones) are still publicly available. Hope there is not a bug in pbase that allows people to see those casino photos via some links.
"Doug Greenwald" wrote in message news:xhHHd.12909$ru.12373@fed1read07... BTW - you've got some nice work in your galleries. When I clicked on the direct picture links in your original post it told me I had to log in as you to view the image. But it let me view the gallery via the links at the top of the page. -- Doug Greenwald Keeper of the Bad Attitude "McWave" wrote in message ... Actually many casinos are very beautiful inside, such as Paris, Venetian, and New York New York. So it may be very common for tourists to take pictures inside, and casinos are not against this. For example, I have seen many photos about the lions in MGM. However, casinos might be really unwilling to see photos about people gambling, and they have the right to prevent such photos from being published online. Hope my understanding is correct. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"McWave" wrote in message
... If you are on private property you should always seek permission *before* taking photos. Getting permission/release avoids problems and is ethically correct. If you obtain a release you have the opportunity to use your photos for commercial purposes. You may also need a release from anyone whose face is recognizable if the photo will be used for commercial purposes. Good Luck, me Thank you for your advices. Sure it is necessary to get permissions before using anyone's photo for commercial purposes. But for non-commercial purposes, it is OK. Actually there are millions of people's faces shown on different photos taken on streets, parks, beaches, etc. Thanks I myself am *very* cautious about how I use photos of people without a release. I also consider it to be a point of ethics, I ask myself "How would I want my face used?" YMMV and it obviously does. This is a slippery slope that I fear to go down without good legal and moral justification. Good Luck, me PS: Thanks for turning off the HTML! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"McWave" wrote in message ... Are you sure about this? For example, if I take pictures inside some private properties such as a hotel or a restaurant, will I meet problems? Thanks YES. Did you know that photographers have been sued for photographing the famous "Lone Cypress" tree in Carmel, CA? You do not have a right to photograph private property for personal gain. I am REALLY surprised that you got a camera into and out of a casino. Many people DO NOT want to be seen gambling and casinos don't want to discourage anyone from dropping a bundle there, so they have very strict rules about photography. George |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Marc 182 wrote: All of that is true. However, couple of years ago I shot a wedding at Las Vegas's Bellagio Casino. Nice place. What happens several times a day there is that the elevator doors open and a bride and her party will burst out and start a mad dash through the slot machines and tables to the wedding chapel. This is met with enthusiastic cheering from the casino crowd. I shot this part by running ahead of the party, squatting to a three- point shooting position, and taking a shot. Run ahead and repeat. I even shot a couple in natural light, pulling the zoom to streak and blur all the flashy gambling lights on either side of the bridal party. While I was doing this I fully expected a heavy hand to land on my shoulder, and we were anything but sly or subtle. To the contrary, I saw security clearing folks away ahead of our path. Obviously they see this kind of thing a lot. Not something you can rely on, but that's how it played out. Marc Now all the OP has to do is hire a bride and groom to be all his pictures ;-) -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Liberal Media Elite Dan Rather declares Edwards the debate winner | Lord Valve | Digital Photography | 3 | October 6th 04 08:20 AM |
did anyone try this: cheap point-n-shoot on the back of a large format beast? | chibitul | Digital Photography | 241 | August 16th 04 12:02 PM |
Nosey Clerks Turning People Into Police | Larry R Harrison Jr | Film & Labs | 14 | July 31st 04 11:20 PM |
do you know these people? | William Jackson | Digital Photography | 0 | July 27th 04 02:20 PM |
some of my work | Michael Scarpitti | Fine Art, Framing and Display | 26 | November 12th 03 12:23 AM |