New Leica Compact

In article m,
Savageduck wrote:

And your sig delimiter is missing a blank space and is thus
broken too...

and nope!


--

Regards,
Savageduck

No point in arguing. The blank in the delimiter is missing. I have not
edited your post in the above. And the supersede command was obviously
not honored.

Have a nice day.

I am well aware of the formatting for a SIG delimiter and that is what I use.
With the exception of you, RichA, and whisky-dave (and they are using that
abomination G2/01) all others who have responded to my posts have my sig
stripped from their responses.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

maybe in the past you had it correct, but currently there is no
trailing space.

On Jun 11, 2015, nospam wrote
(in ) :

In news.com,
wrote:

And your sig delimiter is missing a blank space and is thus
broken too...

and nope!


--

Regards,
Savageduck

No point in arguing. The blank in the delimiter is missing. I have not
edited your post in the above. And the supersede command was obviously
not honored.

Have a nice day.

I am well aware of the formatting for a SIG delimiter and that is what I
use.
With the exception of you, RichA, and whisky-dave (and they are using that
abomination G2/01) all others who have responded to my posts have my sig
stripped from their responses.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

maybe in the past you had it correct, but currently there is no
trailing space.

I don’t get it I have changed nothing with my sig file and I have formatted
it correctly in Usenet clients now defunct, (MT-NW), and currently Unison and
Hogwasher.
I will repeat this reply with both Unison and Hogwasher.

This is a Hogwasher 5.01 response.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

On 2015-06-12 04:20:25 +0000, nospam said:

In article m,
Savageduck wrote:

And your sig delimiter is missing a blank space and is thus
broken too...

and nope!


--

Regards,
Savageduck

No point in arguing. The blank in the delimiter is missing. I have not
edited your post in the above. And the supersede command was obviously
not honored.

Have a nice day.

I am well aware of the formatting for a SIG delimiter and that is what I use.
With the exception of you, RichA, and whisky-dave (and they are using that
abomination G2/01) all others who have responded to my posts have my sig
stripped from their responses.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

maybe in the past you had it correct, but currently there is no
trailing space.

I don’t get it I have changed nothing with my sig file and I have
formatted it correctly in all my Usenet clients including the now
defunct, (MT-NW), and currently Unison (1.8.1 and 2.2) and Hogwasher.
I will repeat this reply with both Unison and Hogwasher.

....and this is the Unison 1.8.1 response.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article m,
Savageduck wrote:

I am well aware of the formatting for a SIG delimiter and that is what I
use.
With the exception of you, RichA, and whisky-dave (and they are using that
abomination G2/01) all others who have responded to my posts have my sig
stripped from their responses.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

maybe in the past you had it correct, but currently there is no
trailing space.

I don¹t get it I have changed nothing with my sig file and I have formatted
it correctly in Usenet clients now defunct, (MT-NW), and currently Unison and
Hogwasher.
I will repeat this reply with both Unison and Hogwasher.

This is a Hogwasher 5.01 response.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

broken

In article 2015061121445683871-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:


maybe in the past you had it correct, but currently there is no
trailing space.

I don¹t get it I have changed nothing with my sig file and I have
formatted it correctly in all my Usenet clients including the now
defunct, (MT-NW), and currently Unison (1.8.1 and 2.2) and Hogwasher.
I will repeat this reply with both Unison and Hogwasher.

...and this is the Unison 1.8.1 response.

working

On Jun 11, 2015, nospam wrote
(in ) :

In news.com,
wrote:

I am well aware of the formatting for a SIG delimiter and that is what
I
use.
With the exception of you, RichA, and whisky-dave (and they are using
that
abomination G2/01) all others who have responded to my posts have my
sig
stripped from their responses.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

maybe in the past you had it correct, but currently there is no
trailing space.

I don¹t get it I have changed nothing with my sig file and I have
formatted
it correctly in Usenet clients now defunct, (MT-NW), and currently Unison
and
Hogwasher.
I will repeat this reply with both Unison and Hogwasher.

This is a Hogwasher 5.01 response.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

broken

Then there might be an issue with the recent Hogwasher 5.01 update.
I will report it to Kurt, he has been responsive in the past, so we shall
see.

First though, I am going to quit and reopen Hogwasher after rechecking the
sig file.

BTW: for some reason it is stripped properly from recent responses from
PeterN, Wild , Tony Cooper, Jonas, and some others.
--

Regards,
Savageduck

On 11/06/2015 20:34, PeterN wrote:
On 6/11/2015 3:07 PM, android wrote:
[]
If you want mirrorless then there are Nikkor adapters for Fuji, Sony and
EOS-M. And 4/3 if you can accept such a small censor.

The sensors are too small to satisfy my liking for WA.

Not sure what wide-angle you want, but for my MFT camera I have a 9-18
mm (eq. 18-36 mm) zoom, and a very compact 9 mm (e.g. 18 mm) fisheye.
The latter costs around US $120.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

On 6/11/2015 3:51 PM, android wrote:
In article ,
PeterN wrote:

On 6/11/2015 3:07 PM, android wrote:
In article ,
PeterN wrote:

On 6/10/2015 10:05 PM, android wrote:
In article ,
PeterN wrote:

On 6/10/2015 5:14 PM, Mort wrote:
android wrote:
The camera looks nice, but not the pricetag... It's a compact
after all!

http://www.shutterbug.com/content/le...-full-frame-le
ica-q-compact-camera-full-resolution-test-images
http://tinyurl.com/ntt2x38



At $4,250.-, all I can say is O.M.G.

Mort Linder

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Actually if isn't that much if you compare it to my D800 + lens.

Nah, and your a cheepoo that hasn't upgraded to the D810. People like
you are killing Nikanon dead!


Actually I am thingkin about the 750. It has an articulating EFV, and
reportability good low light capability. Realistically though i want to
see a mirrorless Nikon.

If you want mirrorless then there are Nikkor adapters for Fuji, Sony and
EOS-M. And 4/3 if you can accept such a small censor.


The sensors are too small to satisfy my liking for WA.

I have a fisheye...

The widest I have for DX is a 10.5 semi fisheye. When I straighten out
the lines, it equates to about an 18, FF. The widest FF I have is 15mm.
I did not go wider because I also like to usse ND filters, for longer
exosure, and polarizing filters, for obvious reasons.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/Booth%20Bay%20Sunset.jpg


EF and chipped third party lenses works as expected with the wired
adapter on the EOS-M. A caveat is that the chips that I use have to be
programmed with an EF camera.

From what I hear, auto focusing is way too slow with converters.

Oki... Mostly MF here.


I do a lot of MF, but that is difficult for shots like this:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/Cleared%20For%20Landing.jpg

You should convince the Duck to try out one of those focal reducers and
report to the group!

Why? Are you argument challenged?

No. He has a combo that is basically what you seem to be looking for and
a focal reducer could make it FF-ish.



--
PeterN

On 6/11/2015 11:50 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Jun 11, 2015, android wrote
(in ):

In news.com,
wrote:

On Jun 11, 2015, android wrote
(in ):

In news.com,
wrote:

On Jun 11, 2015, android wrote
(in ):


You didn't like your Sony enough to keep it...

Is there a reason you are duplicate posting?

I think we got the message the first time.

Your NNTP server seem to be broken since it don't respect the supersede
command.

Nope!

And your sig delimiter is missing a blank space and is thus
broken too...

and nope!


--

Regards,
Savageduck

No point in arguing. The blank in the delimiter is missing. I have not
edited your post in the above. And the supersede command was obviously
not honored.

Have a nice day.

I am well aware of the formatting for a SIG delimiter and that is what I use.
With the exception of you, RichA, and whisky-dave (and they are using that
abomination G2/01) all others who have responded to my posts have my sig
stripped from their responses.

--

Regards,
Savageduck


Not mine. I use Thunderbird. I have to manually strip. (The sig line.)


--
PeterN

On 6/12/2015 12:46 AM, nospam wrote:
In article m,
Savageduck wrote:

I am well aware of the formatting for a SIG delimiter and that is what I
use.
With the exception of you, RichA, and whisky-dave (and they are using that
abomination G2/01) all others who have responded to my posts have my sig
stripped from their responses.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

maybe in the past you had it correct, but currently there is no
trailing space.

I don¹t get it I have changed nothing with my sig file and I have formatted
it correctly in Usenet clients now defunct, (MT-NW), and currently Unison and
Hogwasher.
I will repeat this reply with both Unison and Hogwasher.

This is a Hogwasher 5.01 response.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

broken

Yep!

--
PeterN