If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma Digital SLR Cameras.
"Phil Wheeler" wrote in message
... Georgette Preddy wrote: I don't know of anyone who knows anything about digital who shoots above the lowest ISO setting. Which simply proves that you know no one who knows anything about digital. We already have concluded that you are in that category, Giorgio. Notice the implicature in GP's statement. Advertisers will often go the "play dumb" route, with statements like: "we know of no other product as good as ours." With the Sigma SLRs you'd better not try to shoot at higher ISOs. It's one reason that the Sigma SLRs are solidly in the sub-amateur category, EXCEPT, for landscapes and studio portraits. No one would buy one for any sort of action photography or low light photographt, where higher ISO settings are necessary. GP knows no one who knows anything about digital--including himself. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma Digital SLR Cameras.
"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" wrote in message t...
"Biff Mullins" wrote in message m... Thinking about buying the Sigma DSLR. Either the SD9 or the SD10. Is the SD10 worth the extra money? What would be the best lens to start out with. Oh yeah, does anyone know when that Foveon point and shoot will be available? If you need higher ISO settings, the SD10 is the better choice. Agreed. The SD10 is the lowest noise DLSR out there today by a huge margin. Its sensor pixels are a whopping 33% larger than the full frame, $8,000 Canon 1Ds. That really shows in the noise tests where the 90's-vintage Canon CMOS really gets clobbered by National Semiconductor's latest design... http://www.pbase.com/image/31155134/original |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma Digital SLR Cameras.
"Georgette Preddy" wrote in message om... "Peter A. Stavrakoglou" wrote in message t... "Biff Mullins" wrote in message m... Thinking about buying the Sigma DSLR. Either the SD9 or the SD10. Is the SD10 worth the extra money? What would be the best lens to start out with. Oh yeah, does anyone know when that Foveon point and shoot will be available? If you need higher ISO settings, the SD10 is the better choice. Agreed. The SD10 is the lowest noise DLSR out there today by a huge margin. Its sensor pixels are a whopping 33% larger than the full frame, $8,000 Canon 1Ds. That really shows in the noise tests where the 90's-vintage Canon CMOS really gets clobbered by National Semiconductor's latest design... http://www.pbase.com/image/31155134/original Too bad the lenses suck. I know, I own two Sigma lenses. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
TP wrote:
"Zebedee" wrote: Before you look for a Sigma DSLR, have a look at the scathing review on www.dcresource.com about it. There is nothing scathing about that review. It is a highly complimentary review that expresses some reservations about the quality of Sigma lenses. But we knew that anyway. Some excerpts will show that the review is far from scathing: --- QUOTED FROM www.dcresource.com: --- You will, however, find that this 3.4 Megapixel image blows away anything you've seen before in terms of image quality. I think you'll agree after viewing the sample photos attached to this review. --- Included with the SD10 is the excellent Sigma Photo Pro 2.0 software. This software should serve as an example to other camera manufacturers, with its great user interface and robust performance. You'll be spending a lot of time in Photo Pro, since the camera only saves photos in RAW (X3F) format. At first glance, Photo Pro looks like just another photo browser (see above photo). But select an image and you'll find a lot more functionality. --- In general, I was pleased with the results I saw using the auto correction feature. If you're not satisfied with how that looks, you can tweak the settings until the image looks like what you were expecting. The manual included with the SD10 is pretty good for a camera manual. I especially liked the lengthy explanations, and minimal fine print. --- The first thing you'll notice while looking at the back of the camera is just how simple everything is. There are just a few buttons and no dials, making it a welcome change from more complex D-SLRs. --- If you clicked on those images above, or if you know anything about the X3 sensor, you won't be surprised to hear my assessment of the image quality: it's awesome, especially after a trip through that auto adjustment feature. The sharpness and resolution are truly stunning --- While the Sigma SD10 would be a nice D-SLR if it used a traditional CCD or CMOS sensor, it's the SD10's Foveon X3 image sensor which really makes it stand out from the crowd. Image quality is, in a word, stunning. --- Another standout feature of the camera is the Sigma Photo Pro software, which you'll learn to love. That's because you must post-process every image, as they're all saved in RAW format. Thankfully, the Photo Pro software is both capable and responsive. You can let the camera make automatic adjustments to the image, or you can tweak it yourself. --- What I liked: Stunning image quality Robust performance FireWire and USB ports Uses AA batteries (instead of lithium-ion) Easy to use All the benefits of a D-SLR: lenses, flashes, and full manual controls Excellent Photo Pro software What I didn't care for: Poor low light focusing without external flash Dust seems to be a problem Some of Sigma's lenses are not so great All images must be post-processed (this may be a good thing, depending on your point of view) Above average noise at high ISOs Bulky all the best |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. | Laurence Matson | Digital Photography | 174 | August 1st 04 04:55 PM |
Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. | Biff Mullins | 35mm Photo Equipment | 15 | July 11th 04 02:36 AM |
My Sigma camera and lens collection | Giorgio Preddio | Digital Photography | 65 | July 7th 04 10:03 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |