If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I
should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - FOR SCENIC, NATURE PHOTOGRAPHS OF HAWAII, WATERFALLS, RAINBOWS & MORE VISIT MY WEBSITE, SUSAN A. LEVINE PHOTOGRAPHIC ART http://www.lbdassociates.com/salphotos/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
In article P3Zrf.22032$mz2.5965@trnddc08, Rainbow Girl Sue
wrote: I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. You need neither. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
Precisely what must you protect your lens from? Neither filter will stop a
bullet. Rob --------------------------------------- "Rainbow Girl Sue" wrote ... I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
In message ,
Bill wrote: A skylight filter adds a slight warming to your images, which you usually want to avoid under many circumstances. I'm not advocating ewither, but the slight difference in whiteness is moot with digital, unless you are using a fixed WB preset. A filter that is slightly red will actually bring the mnatural WB of most digitals a little closer to white, anyway, as they tend to capture everything greenish-cyan at the RAW level. -- John P Sheehy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
Rainbow Girl Sue wrote:
I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. If you're into beach scenes go for the 1A perhaps even a 1B. If you're into general scenics go for the UV. If you're into street shooting or indoor shooting, you don't need either one. One of the best ways to protect your lens is to use a lens hood .... all the time. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
Rainbow Girl Sue wrote:
I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens A lens cap is much more sturdy. & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. There are also protection filters which are completely neutral, optically. Buy a high quality coated one. -Wolfgang |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
In article P3Zrf.22032$mz2.5965@trnddc08, "Rainbow Girl Sue"
wrote: I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. Sue- The need for such protection is often suggested by dealers who want to scare you into spending more money. Neither UV, Haze nor Skylight will hurt your lens, so it doesn't need to be protected from them. The use of a filter will degrade your images slightly. If you happen to be using the cheap kit lens that comes with Canon, go ahead. You won't be able to tell the difference! Fred |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
Fred McKenzie wrote:
In article P3Zrf.22032$mz2.5965@trnddc08, "Rainbow Girl Sue" wrote: I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. Sue- The need for such protection is often suggested by dealers who want to scare you into spending more money. Neither UV, Haze nor Skylight will hurt your lens, so it doesn't need to be protected from them. The use of a filter will degrade your images slightly. If you happen to be using the cheap kit lens that comes with Canon, go ahead. You won't be able to tell the difference! Fred I strongly disagree that 1) that it's the dealer who wants to scare you, and 2) that there is any image degradation, at least with reasonable quality filters. I use Hoya super coated UV filters on my lenses. I used to use tiffen. I have never seen an issue with degradation of image quality, except for the following: Some 35mm lenses have a pretty flat front element. This can result in a reflection between the front lens element and the filter (any filter). I have found reflections in images with highly transmitting filters. (I have not seen the problem with circular polarizers). The Hoya super coated filters do not have this problem, and their optical quality is high. The advantage of a filter is that it protects the front lens element. For example, when you work outdoors you will get dust on the optical surface then humidity/water spray/rain moistens the dust and glues it to the optical surface. Water and/or humidity partially dissolves the minerals/chemicals in the dust, which if not completely removed, will later precipitate onto the optical surface as the surface dries, cementing the dust particle to the surface. You can clean it carefully, but over time the optical surface and coatings degrade. One can simply throw away the filter an put on a new one when you get to that point. High humidity environments will do the same. Examples: Hiking in the mountains: dust gets on the camera, you approach a waterfall and spray wets the dust. Ocean spray of salt water is very damaging. Snowy day: snow wets the lens, gluing the dust down. etc. If all your work is in a clean room, you don't need a filter. While a lens hood protects against some of the dirt problems, wide angle lenses are more of a problem because the hood can't provide a tight opening. My 500 f/4 L IS lens has a great hood and does a very good job of protecting against dust, and I do not use a filter on it (they are not made that big). For my smaller lenses, I use step up rings to bring most lenses to a common size. That way I only need a couple of filter sizes. For example, my largest lens (excluding the 500 mm) uses 77 mm filters. But most of my lenses use 72 and smaller filters. So I bought step-up rings to bring those lenses to 72 mm. I use 72 and 77 Hoya super coated filters on my lenses and with digital I only carry 72 and 77 mm circular polarizers. On my large format system, I also use 72 mm filters, and use Hoya super coated UV filters on them and carry 72 mm circular polarizers and 81A and 81B filters. Roger Photos at: http://www.clarkvision.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
Rainbow Girl Sue wrote:
I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. I only use filters for protection on my 28-70, 20mm and 300mm f/2.8 as they have a large front area and little 'depth' of lensshade to protect the front element. At that, once shooting I often remove the filter unless there's a lot of rain/mist/dust/children's fingers/ etc. If you insist, then the UV. Or the Skylight if you're above 5000 ft ASL most of the time. Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
UV Filter vs. Skylight
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
... Rainbow Girl Sue wrote: I was going to buy a filter to protect my lens & was wondering whether I should get a UV/Haze Filter or a Skylight 1-A. They look very similar. Are there any advantages of one or the other? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. I only use filters for protection on my 28-70, 20mm and 300mm f/2.8 as they have a large front area and little 'depth' of lensshade to protect the front element. At that, once shooting I often remove the filter unless there's a lot of rain/mist/dust/children's fingers/ etc. If you insist, then the UV. Or the Skylight if you're above 5000 ft ASL most of the time. Cheers, Alan Don't you have that backwards? The UV becomes effective at altitude, the skylight just adds a little red to counteract the blue of the sky for photos in open shade, etc. -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skylight or UV filter for Canon 350d? | Andy Piper | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | September 8th 05 01:10 AM |
UV Protector filter vs. Skylight filter? | john | Digital Photography | 8 | June 26th 04 04:44 PM |
UV Protector filter vs. Skylight filter? | john | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | June 26th 04 04:44 PM |
FS -- 49mm filter set star 6, split field, 80A, 198 A+holder | James Cloud | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | June 18th 04 06:26 PM |
FA : Large 95mm Skylight Filter Canon Made : Ending Soon | Suresh Kumar | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 31st 04 05:28 AM |