If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Monitor calibration and default hardware white point
I am trying to generate a color profile for my monitor using the Adobe
Gamma that comes with Photoshop (I have version 7). I have already spent a lot more time on this than I intended -- searching the Internet for tutorials and resources on the subject, and I just want to generate a general-purpose color profile; e.g., my needs aren't specific to print, web, video, etc. I have downloaded canned ICM profiles for my monitor targeted at 5000, 6500, and 9300K. Most resources seem to indicate that a color temperature of 6500K is desirable for most purposes. However, the default hardware color temperature that my monitor is set to is 9300K. Am I supposed to change my *monitor* temperature to 6500K in addition to the software settings? Because when I do, the screen looks awfully dark and yellow -- not at all what I am used to. And I would assume that the factory defaults would be a closer baseline to what is most comfortable to the eye. But anyway, could someone please tell me if this is the correct procedure to calibrating the monitor through Adobe Gamma for 6500K: 1.) Change my monitor from the default setting to 6500K 2.) Load the 6500K canned ICM in Adobe Gamma as the starting point 3.) Calibrate from there When doing so, I noticed several strange things: 1) The phosphors are listed as "custom" but I am almost positive it is Triniton, and 2) the Gamma value is listed as custom instead of "Windows Default" with a value of 2.50. 3) The hardware white point is listed at 5000K. Oddly, I repeated the same steps using the default 9300K monitor setting and 9300K ICM, and the values are the same. FWIW, the monitor I have is a 21 inch CRT, IBM 6558 P202; it's manufactured by Sony from what I've read. Any help would be much appreciated. I am really new to color management and right now I don't have much time to invest in learning, but would like to at least generate at least a *reasonably* optimized color profile that is better than not nothing, which is what I have now. Thank you. Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave" wrote in message ...
I am trying to generate a color profile for my monitor using the Adobe Gamma that comes with Photoshop (I have version 7). I have already spent a lot more time on this than I intended -- searching the Internet for tutorials and resources on the subject, and I just want to generate a general-purpose color profile; e.g., my needs aren't specific to print, web, video, etc. I have downloaded canned ICM profiles for my monitor targeted at 5000, 6500, and 9300K. Most resources seem to indicate that a color temperature of 6500K is desirable for most purposes. However, the default hardware color temperature that my monitor is set to is 9300K. Am I supposed to change my *monitor* temperature to 6500K in addition to the software settings? Because when I do, the screen looks awfully dark and yellow -- not at all what I am used to. And I would assume that the factory defaults would be a closer baseline to what is most comfortable to the eye. You must allow a few days for your eyes to adjust. If 9300K is all you've ever used, 6500K will look horribly yellow for a few days, but your eyes will eventually adjust. But anyway, could someone please tell me if this is the correct procedure to calibrating the monitor through Adobe Gamma for 6500K: 1.) Change my monitor from the default setting to 6500K 2.) Load the 6500K canned ICM in Adobe Gamma as the starting point 3.) Calibrate from there etc Follow Ian Lyons' excellent procedure, available he http://www.computer-darkroom.com/ps7-colour/ps7_1.htm Rick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave" wrote in message ...
I am trying to generate a color profile for my monitor using the Adobe Gamma that comes with Photoshop (I have version 7). I have already spent a lot more time on this than I intended -- searching the Internet for tutorials and resources on the subject, and I just want to generate a general-purpose color profile; e.g., my needs aren't specific to print, web, video, etc. I have downloaded canned ICM profiles for my monitor targeted at 5000, 6500, and 9300K. Most resources seem to indicate that a color temperature of 6500K is desirable for most purposes. However, the default hardware color temperature that my monitor is set to is 9300K. Am I supposed to change my *monitor* temperature to 6500K in addition to the software settings? Because when I do, the screen looks awfully dark and yellow -- not at all what I am used to. And I would assume that the factory defaults would be a closer baseline to what is most comfortable to the eye. You must allow a few days for your eyes to adjust. If 9300K is all you've ever used, 6500K will look horribly yellow for a few days, but your eyes will eventually adjust. But anyway, could someone please tell me if this is the correct procedure to calibrating the monitor through Adobe Gamma for 6500K: 1.) Change my monitor from the default setting to 6500K 2.) Load the 6500K canned ICM in Adobe Gamma as the starting point 3.) Calibrate from there etc Follow Ian Lyons' excellent procedure, available he http://www.computer-darkroom.com/ps7-colour/ps7_1.htm Rick |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rick wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... I have downloaded canned ICM profiles for my monitor targeted at 5000, 6500, and 9300K. Most resources seem to indicate that a color temperature of 6500K is desirable for most purposes. However, the default hardware color temperature that my monitor is set to is 9300K. Am I supposed to change my *monitor* temperature to 6500K in addition to the software settings? Because when I do, the screen looks awfully dark and yellow -- not at all what I am used to. And I would assume that the factory defaults would be a closer baseline to what is most comfortable to the eye. You must allow a few days for your eyes to adjust. If 9300K is all you've ever used, 6500K will look horribly yellow for a few days, but your eyes will eventually adjust. It's a relief to know I'm not crazy. But anyway, could someone please tell me if this is the correct procedure to calibrating the monitor through Adobe Gamma for 6500K: 1.) Change my monitor from the default setting to 6500K 2.) Load the 6500K canned ICM in Adobe Gamma as the starting point 3.) Calibrate from there etc Follow Ian Lyons' excellent procedure, available he http://www.computer-darkroom.com/ps7-colour/ps7_1.htm Thanks for the tip. Believe it or not, I had actually been using that guide, which generated further confusion when I attempted to use my manufacturer supplied ICMs as a starting point for calibration. As noted in my previous message, when using the vendor supplied ICMs the following differences were observed (by comparison to creating a new ICM from scratch): 1) The phosphors were listed as "custom" even though I know they're Triniton. Should I leave them at "custom" anyway? 2) The Gamma value is listed as custom (2.50) instead of "Windows Default"? I don't know if I should change it to "Windows Default" or leave it at 2.50. 3) The hardware white point is listed at 5000K instead of 6500K. Repeating the same steps using the default 9300K monitor setting and 9300K ICM profile yielded the same results. Should I change this to 6500K? In short, the calibration process seems to produce the results anticipated when following the guide *if* I start from scratch, but when I start from the vendor supplied ICM profiles, the results leave me wondering whether I should avoid using the baseline profiles for my monitor. I compared the monitor ICC files from the original monitor installation disk (file timestamps of '97) with a set I downloaded from the IBM site for a similar but newer monitor, and they were binary identical; I'm not sure how "fine-tuned" they could possibly be for my monitor... Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Rick wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... I have downloaded canned ICM profiles for my monitor targeted at 5000, 6500, and 9300K. Most resources seem to indicate that a color temperature of 6500K is desirable for most purposes. However, the default hardware color temperature that my monitor is set to is 9300K. Am I supposed to change my *monitor* temperature to 6500K in addition to the software settings? Because when I do, the screen looks awfully dark and yellow -- not at all what I am used to. And I would assume that the factory defaults would be a closer baseline to what is most comfortable to the eye. You must allow a few days for your eyes to adjust. If 9300K is all you've ever used, 6500K will look horribly yellow for a few days, but your eyes will eventually adjust. It's a relief to know I'm not crazy. But anyway, could someone please tell me if this is the correct procedure to calibrating the monitor through Adobe Gamma for 6500K: 1.) Change my monitor from the default setting to 6500K 2.) Load the 6500K canned ICM in Adobe Gamma as the starting point 3.) Calibrate from there etc Follow Ian Lyons' excellent procedure, available he http://www.computer-darkroom.com/ps7-colour/ps7_1.htm Thanks for the tip. Believe it or not, I had actually been using that guide, which generated further confusion when I attempted to use my manufacturer supplied ICMs as a starting point for calibration. As noted in my previous message, when using the vendor supplied ICMs the following differences were observed (by comparison to creating a new ICM from scratch): 1) The phosphors were listed as "custom" even though I know they're Triniton. Should I leave them at "custom" anyway? 2) The Gamma value is listed as custom (2.50) instead of "Windows Default"? I don't know if I should change it to "Windows Default" or leave it at 2.50. 3) The hardware white point is listed at 5000K instead of 6500K. Repeating the same steps using the default 9300K monitor setting and 9300K ICM profile yielded the same results. Should I change this to 6500K? In short, the calibration process seems to produce the results anticipated when following the guide *if* I start from scratch, but when I start from the vendor supplied ICM profiles, the results leave me wondering whether I should avoid using the baseline profiles for my monitor. I compared the monitor ICC files from the original monitor installation disk (file timestamps of '97) with a set I downloaded from the IBM site for a similar but newer monitor, and they were binary identical; I'm not sure how "fine-tuned" they could possibly be for my monitor... Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dave wrote in message ...
Any help would be much appreciated. I am really new to color management and right now I don't have much time to invest in learning, but would like to at least generate at least a *reasonably* optimized color profile that is better than not nothing, which is what I have now. Dave... after messing around with software, todo's and howto's for two years... I have finally given up and purchased a Colorvision Spyder when price was reduced from something around 400,- to something around 150,- I use it with the allegedly amateurish PhotoCal solution (rather than the professional Optical that let's you play with the settings more but costs a lot more). I plug it in and it will calibrate my TFT monitor, my Powerbook and my CRT screen in about 3 minutes each. It generates a profile for Windows and Mac and my results have become much more accurate - the screen now "good-enough" matches the professional output I get from my printing service. It's so easy, I calibrate my equipment everytime I start a Photoshop session (these usually mean: 4+ hours with Photoshop). Actually, this is what you need to do: calibrate often |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave" wrote in message ...
Rick wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... I have downloaded canned ICM profiles for my monitor targeted at 5000, 6500, and 9300K. Most resources seem to indicate that a color temperature of 6500K is desirable for most purposes. However, the default hardware color temperature that my monitor is set to is 9300K. Am I supposed to change my *monitor* temperature to 6500K in addition to the software settings? Because when I do, the screen looks awfully dark and yellow -- not at all what I am used to. And I would assume that the factory defaults would be a closer baseline to what is most comfortable to the eye. You must allow a few days for your eyes to adjust. If 9300K is all you've ever used, 6500K will look horribly yellow for a few days, but your eyes will eventually adjust. It's a relief to know I'm not crazy. But anyway, could someone please tell me if this is the correct procedure to calibrating the monitor through Adobe Gamma for 6500K: 1.) Change my monitor from the default setting to 6500K 2.) Load the 6500K canned ICM in Adobe Gamma as the starting point 3.) Calibrate from there etc Follow Ian Lyons' excellent procedure, available he http://www.computer-darkroom.com/ps7-colour/ps7_1.htm Thanks for the tip. Believe it or not, I had actually been using that guide, which generated further confusion when I attempted to use my manufacturer supplied ICMs as a starting point for calibration. As noted in my previous message, when using the vendor supplied ICMs the following differences were observed (by comparison to creating a new ICM from scratch): The purpose of Ian's procedure is to create a custom ICM from scratch. Don't use canned ones, they are intended for customers who for one reason or another cannot create their own. Rick |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The canned profiles are usually a good starting point, but only
to get the correct phosphor values. Ignore everything else, and simply calibrate using Ian Lyons' technique. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I plug it in and it will calibrate my TFT monitor, my Powerbook and my CRT screen in about 3 minutes each. It generates a profile for Windows and Mac and my results have become much more accurate - the screen now "good-enough" matches the professional output I get from my printing service. It's so easy, I calibrate my equipment everytime I start a Photoshop session (these usually mean: 4+ hours with Photoshop). Actually, this is what you need to do: calibrate often I use the spyder with my TFT as well. I wonder how often you need to calibrate a LCD as opposed to a CRT? It would seem a lcd has no way near the kind of light fall-off or aging a tube based monitor would have. Jim -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Waggener" wrote in message ...
I plug it in and it will calibrate my TFT monitor, my Powerbook and my CRT screen in about 3 minutes each. It generates a profile for Windows and Mac and my results have become much more accurate - the screen now "good-enough" matches the professional output I get from my printing service. It's so easy, I calibrate my equipment everytime I start a Photoshop session (these usually mean: 4+ hours with Photoshop). Actually, this is what you need to do: calibrate often I use the spyder with my TFT as well. I wonder how often you need to calibrate a LCD as opposed to a CRT? It would seem a lcd has no way near the kind of light fall-off or aging a tube based monitor would have. Wrong. LCD backlights like all other fluorescent lamps typically lose 30-40% of their brightness within the first two years, three tops. And eventually they fail altogether. Rick |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|