If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canon's 50mp DSLR. Higher res than D810, but more moire andnoise
On 8/05/2015 5:49 p.m., android wrote:
In article , RichA wrote: IMO, the resolution is noticeable but not huge because the linear resolution increase isn't that great. It sounds like a lot when you say, "50mp compared to 36" but that's not how resolution works. If you want to double resolution, you need to quadruple pixel count. It does show more moire than the D810, I don't know why. Noise is perhaps 1/3 to 1/2 stop worse than the Nikon. Because file sizes are dependent on area, unlike resolution, file sizes are considerably larger. I don't think that the moire is "worse", just different because of sampling frequency on the patterns on the test target. Bitching about whether an AA filter is still needed or not (even at only 36mp) should be made after adding the D800 to the comparison tool. Moire appears in the D800 image in exactly the same place as with the D800E and D810, it's certainly not eliminated by the AA filter, only reduced. I'd expect to see the same difference between the two 5DS models when DPReview add the 5Ds to the compare tool. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/imag...&attr13_0=cano n_eos5dsr&attr13_1=nikon_d810&attr13_2=pentax_645z &attr13_3=phaseone_iq180&att r15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&a ttr16_0=200&attr16_1=200&att r16_2=200&attr16_3=35&normalization=full&widget=1& x=-0.5172853599968508&y=0.26 069086651053863 If you check the noise in DxO you'll se that high ISO noise is lover in 1Dx than in the D810. I also downloaded the ISO 6400 files for the 5Dsr and 1Dx from Imaging Resource and found that noise vise, at the same imagesize they there not to tell apart... Click on the measurements tab: http://tinyurl.com/lng7t2c http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compa...810-versus-Nik on-D4-versus-Canon-EOS-1Dx___963_767_753 Really? That link to DXO shows very little difference at all in high ISO noise between any of those 3 cameras. The "score" - Sports (Low Light ISO) are 2786, 2853, and 2956. If you were able to set your camera to ISO 2786 and 2956 and compare the result (image noise) do you think you'd be able to pick the difference? Even if you could, then what practical difference would it make anyway? File size might make a practical difference, so might resolution. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ken Rockwell's images from Canon's new 50MP DSLR are...peculiar! | Oregonian Haruspex | Digital Photography | 5 | March 31st 15 08:57 PM |
Nikon D810 hands-on review: “The highest image quality in a Nikon DSLR to date” | David Taylor | Digital Photography | 20 | June 29th 14 07:21 AM |
Are higher definition DSLR's significantly above 10 mega pixel near? | HEMI-Powered | Digital SLR Cameras | 17 | August 9th 08 02:42 PM |
Are higher definition DSLR's significantly above 10 mega pixel near? | Chris Malcolm[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | August 6th 08 05:57 PM |
Essentials for getting 12X18 and higher prints with Canon Rebel DSLR | Tony Graber | Photographing Nature | 2 | January 8th 07 09:54 PM |