If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, RichA wrote:
https://petapixel.com/2020/07/30/hig...g-off-mirrors/ Only thing is that light doesn't travel ... / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, RichA wrote:
Sure it does. If the sun blew up, it would be 9 minutes before you saw it before the photon stream it puts out ended. There is no photons. What we call light is no thing. It is what something does. We cannot see the "light" but we see the effect of it. Just like we cannot see wind, but we do observe it's effects. / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
In article
alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.2008020301130.86977@cerebro. liukuma.net, Bud Spencer wrote: Sure it does. If the sun blew up, it would be 9 minutes before you saw it before the photon stream it puts out ended. There is no photons. What we call light is no thing. It is what something does. We cannot see the "light" but we see the effect of it. Just like we cannot see wind, but we do observe it's effects. where did you come up with such rubbish? or are you trolling? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, nospam wrote:
where did you come up with such rubbish? or are you trolling? Well, explain to me how does wind look like ... I'm rather interested about this. Also I must correct myself, I made a brainfart comment earlier about light travelling ... Sure light travels since everything in the universe is light. Sorry about that. / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
On 2020-08-01 20:06, Bud Spencer wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, RichA wrote: Sure it does.Â* If the sun blew up, it would be 9 minutes before you saw it before the photon stream it puts out ended. There is no photons. Of course there are photons: massless particles that have energy and therefore due to E=mc^2 have an equivalent mass in the form of energy. What we call light is no thing. Eh? It's observable. It has energy. It's a 'thing'. It is what something does. We cannot see the "light" but we see the effect of it. Just like we cannot see wind, but we do observe it's effects. Light is invisible indeed if not seen head on - otherwise we would not see anything. Thus the article points out that we're seeing the reflection of the light off of particles in the air. But light certainly does travel. Wind is actual molecules of gas moving as a loose mass. Light is observed as either an em wave or particle at any given instant of time. Thus your analogy is pretty bad. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
On 2020-08-02 09:53, Bud Spencer wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, nospam wrote: where did you come up with such rubbish? or are you trolling? Well, explain to me how does wind look like ... I'm rather interested about this. Also I must correct myself, I made a brainfart comment earlier about light travelling ... Sure light travels since everything in the universe is light. Sorry about that. Your flatulence continues. "Everything" in the universe is not light. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
In article
alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.2008021650220.86977@cerebro. liukuma.net, Bud Spencer wrote: where did you come up with such rubbish? or are you trolling? Well, explain to me how does wind look like ... I'm rather interested about this. Also I must correct myself, I made a brainfart comment earlier about light travelling ... Sure light travels since everything in the universe is light. Sorry about that. you didn't answer the question and then said something even more absurd. did you drop out of school at a young age? because this is all explained quite clearly in high school physics. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
Quantum-maddness from Max Planck
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck) and Wilhelm Wien (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Wien) Also his notation of light bending near large gravitational field was originally theorised by Sir Isaac Newton and others after him. A lot one can deduct from the quote of this fuzzy-haired crackpot "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Here is what one of the greatest mind of modern times had to say about all this ... “Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.” ― Nikola Tesla Wind is actual molecules of gas moving as a loose mass. Light is observed as either an em wave or particle at any given instant of time. Thus your analogy is pretty bad. Now you do mix cause and effect here. What causes those gasses to move? What causes trees to bend? What causes medium we call "air" to move? That is the wind, of which effects are observable to us. But is our dear mr. knowitall nospam would like to describe me what does wind itself look like, I'm all ears. There is no dualities in the nature. That is also fallacy we have been indoctrinated in the schools. Also wave is not a thing, it is also effect that is caused by something. Wave in the lake or sea etc. is caused by forementioned wind. Soundwaves are caused by something that resonated in certain frequency ie. our vocalcords. Your flatulence continues. "Everything" in the universe is not light. Wrong again. Everything can be explained by electromagnetic energy, which is light. What tiny minuscule portion is observable to our very limited senses is so small portion that it's laughable. X-rays are light, gamma radiation is light. All things in the universe is some sort of electromagnetic energy, hence everything is light. On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, nospam wrote: where did you come up with such rubbish? or are you trolling? You, as a professional troll and lifestyle disagreer should know what is trolling and what is not ... but to answer your nonsense question: I come up with such non-rubbish by critical think, careful study and research, retroduction (of which you don't know anything) just like all who pursuit the truth, knowledge and wisdom. you didn't answer the question and then said something even more absurd. Now I have. It's your turn to describe what wind looks like, thank you very much. did you drop out of school at a young age? because this is all explained quite clearly in high school physics. Even I don't really give this fuzzy-haired person a lot credit, one thing this drop out thief and bigot got right ... "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Schools are not for learning ... those are for indoctrination and programming. But as a completely programmed drone you don't know anything but to echo what your program tells you to do. We are taught so much complete lies in these "places of education" it's more than criminal! One more thing about mr. onestone ... He was a one big racist-bigot! This one can learn from his travel diaries published by Princeton University Press. One article about the matter can be found he https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...ing-xenophobia And the book you can get here https://www.amazon.com/Travel-Diarie.../dp/0691174415 No affiliation, I don't care such things. Have very nice and productive day! Both of you! / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
For some reason first part of my reply didn't came through. But here it
is. *** On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, Alan Browne wrote: Of course there are photons: massless particles that have energy and therefore due to E=mc^2 have an equivalent mass in the form of energy. No there is no photons, it would be ludicrous to think that something emmits something which then travels to wast distances ... just think about the difference between energies of candle and powerful flashlight for example. Both can be seen from the same faraway distance. How would these photons (should they exist) travel the same distance even their sources have big difference in energy? What about when these particles encounter some liquid media, like water or glass? How would it be possible that both, the candle and flashlight can be seen similarly ... not to mention the fact that after going through the glass or water those particles supposedly for some magical reason speed up back to "lightspeed", which violates the law of conservation of energy ... we do know light slows down while going through more solid medias. Photons are just a fallacy that has been pushed by atomists and mathematicians but has no place in the reality. And no, there is no such things than virtual-particles. Those are just made up to get some equations to work. And what if they really did exist? What would be their place in the REAL world? Do virtual reality have any effect in the reality? It's called VIRTUAL for a reason ... Also I'd like to address this equation you mentioned. Did you know this was work of Henri Poincaré (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Poincar%C3%A9) and was stolen by one fuzzy-haired crackpot whos whole "carreer" was nothing but stealing and plagiarism? This einstein person never inveted anything and this is very well established fact, of which is not taught in schools, and there are many books about this. I'll link some for your convenience: https://archive.org/details/HundertAutorenGegenEinstein https://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Pla.../dp/1544900872 His relativity was stolen from Poincaré https://archive.org/details/oeuvresdelaguer01fragoog Photoelectric effect from Philipp Eduard Anton von Lenard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philipp_Lenard) On Mon, 3 Aug 2020, Bud Spencer wrote: Quantum-maddness from Max Planck (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck) and Wilhelm Wien (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Wien) Also his notation of light bending near large gravitational field was originally theorised by Sir Isaac Newton and others after him. A lot one can deduct from the quote of this fuzzy-haired crackpot "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Here is what one of the greatest mind of modern times had to say about all this ... “Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.” ― Nikola Tesla Wind is actual molecules of gas moving as a loose mass. Light is observed as either an em wave or particle at any given instant of time. Thus your analogy is pretty bad. Now you do mix cause and effect here. What causes those gasses to move? What causes trees to bend? What causes medium we call "air" to move? That is the wind, of which effects are observable to us. But is our dear mr. knowitall nospam would like to describe me what does wind itself look like, I'm all ears. There is no dualities in the nature. That is also fallacy we have been indoctrinated in the schools. Also wave is not a thing, it is also effect that is caused by something. Wave in the lake or sea etc. is caused by forementioned wind. Soundwaves are caused by something that resonated in certain frequency ie. our vocalcords. Your flatulence continues. "Everything" in the universe is not light. Wrong again. Everything can be explained by electromagnetic energy, which is light. What tiny minuscule portion is observable to our very limited senses is so small portion that it's laughable. X-rays are light, gamma radiation is light. All things in the universe is some sort of electromagnetic energy, hence everything is light. On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, nospam wrote: where did you come up with such rubbish? or are you trolling? You, as a professional troll and lifestyle disagreer should know what is trolling and what is not ... but to answer your nonsense question: I come up with such non-rubbish by critical think, careful study and research, retroduction (of which you don't know anything) just like all who pursuit the truth, knowledge and wisdom. you didn't answer the question and then said something even more absurd. Now I have. It's your turn to describe what wind looks like, thank you very much. did you drop out of school at a young age? because this is all explained quite clearly in high school physics. Even I don't really give this fuzzy-haired person a lot credit, one thing this drop out thief and bigot got right ... "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Schools are not for learning ... those are for indoctrination and programming. But as a completely programmed drone you don't know anything but to echo what your program tells you to do. We are taught so much complete lies in these "places of education" it's more than criminal! One more thing about mr. onestone ... He was a one big racist-bigot! This one can learn from his travel diaries published by Princeton University Press. One article about the matter can be found he https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...ing-xenophobia And the book you can get here https://www.amazon.com/Travel-Diarie.../dp/0691174415 No affiliation, I don't care such things. Have very nice and productive day! Both of you! / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 / Bud / a1=S0 b1=[1..2,'L0L'] a2=2*a1 a3=S1.4#b1 a4=(a2,a3) a5=64*a4 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Beam of light shown traveling from mirror to mirror
On 2020-08-03 09:19, Bud Spencer wrote:
Have very nice and productive day! Both of you! Your misunderstanding of fundamentals is blatant. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leica and China. Chinese and progressive whites don't care about killing people, as long as non-whites are only shown in a positive light | Bill W | Digital Photography | 0 | April 19th 19 10:41 PM |
will frequent use of mirror lockup shorten lifespan of mirror mechanism? | Mxsmanic | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | August 16th 04 06:13 PM |
Pentax 6x7 Mirror | Craig Schroeder | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 2 | July 24th 04 02:17 AM |