If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
My camera has various white balance modes and I am unsure about 4 of them...
1. Shooting under "daylight" flourescent lamps 2. Shooting under "warm white" flourescent lamps 3. Shooting under "cool white" flourescent lamps 4. Shooting in incandescent light How do I know which of these above conditions is the condition I am in at the time? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
"Beck" wrote:
My camera has various white balance modes and I am unsure about 4 of them... 1. Shooting under "daylight" flourescent lamps 2. Shooting under "warm white" flourescent lamps 3. Shooting under "cool white" flourescent lamps 4. Shooting in incandescent light How do I know which of these above conditions is the condition I am in at the time? IMO it's a matter of taste with all that white balance stuff. AUTO ist the most convenient mode if you are editing your pictures on the PC/Mac you can easily finetune afterwards. There are many types of flourescent lamps so the mentioned presets can only deliver average results. I would do shots with each of this presets ("white balance" bracketing). Andreas -- http://www.subworld.at |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
How about using auto white balance?
If you shoot RAW you can always adjust WB. www.alldigital.fotopic.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
Arthur Small wrote:
How about using auto white balance? I have it set to auto anyway. Was just having a look through the settings again and found them. Manual is not much help. If you shoot RAW you can always adjust WB. www.alldigital.fotopic.net Camera does do raw photos I have no experience with post processing though. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
John A. Stovall wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:11:45 +0100, "Beck" wrote: My camera has various white balance modes and I am unsure about 4 of them... 1. Shooting under "daylight" flourescent lamps 2. Shooting under "warm white" flourescent lamps 3. Shooting under "cool white" flourescent lamps 4. Shooting in incandescent light How do I know which of these above conditions is the condition I am in at the time? Look at the light bulbs or just shot a couple of test shots. ************************************************** ** With so many different types of lighting, looking at the bulb is not going to help. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
Andreas Thaler wrote:
IMO it's a matter of taste with all that white balance stuff. AUTO ist the most convenient mode if you are editing your pictures on the PC/Mac you can easily finetune afterwards. There are many types of flourescent lamps so the mentioned presets can only deliver average results. I would do shots with each of this presets ("white balance" bracketing). Does auto usually come up with the best results in your experience? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:11:45 +0100, "Beck"
wrote: My camera has various white balance modes and I am unsure about 4 of them... 1. Shooting under "daylight" flourescent lamps 2. Shooting under "warm white" flourescent lamps 3. Shooting under "cool white" flourescent lamps 4. Shooting in incandescent light How do I know which of these above conditions is the condition I am in at the time? Beck, Fluorescent lighting can be difficult to judge because our brain adjusts for the difference in color temperature & there are a few common types in use. In general *most* office/industrial fluorescent lighting tends to be cooler (closer to blue) or "cool white". How to tell which setting is best in part depends on your camera. Many newer digital cameras will show you the effect of changing the White Balance (WB) in the "live LCD" before you actually take the picture, if you have the LCD on & it's not a DSLR. If you can see the change in the "live LCD" than that may be enough for you to see which settings renders the most natural "White" light *before* you take the picture(s). If your camera does not show you the manually selected WB in the "live LCD", you may need to take a few test shots & review/compare the results. In general terms "incandescent/tungsten" refers to "most" common screw-in light bulbs & "most" tiny white Xmas tree or rope lights. 1 more thing to consider is your camera's flash. If the flash is set to automatically fire in low lighting, it's WB may be different than the manual WB you selected. So keep this in mind, if there is enough light to take the pictures you want without the flash, then you may want to turn it off. The beauty of digital photography is that it's virtually free to experiment with such setting & gain some experience with the different settings & what works best & where. Lastly, if your camera has a custom WB mode, you may whish to learn how to set it & consider that option too! Best of luck, I hope some of this is helpful to you. Respectfully, DHB "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
DHB wrote:
How to tell which setting is best in part depends on your camera. Many newer digital cameras will show you the effect of changing the White Balance (WB) in the "live LCD" before you actually take the picture, if you have the LCD on & it's not a DSLR. Yes my camera has this although its quite difficult to judge the differences especially when the LCD often does not reflect the actual picture taken - sometimes pictures that look dark on the lcd actually look alot lighter when on pc or printed. 1 more thing to consider is your camera's flash. If the flash is set to automatically fire in low lighting, it's WB may be different than the manual WB you selected. So keep this in mind, if there is enough light to take the pictures you want without the flash, then you may want to turn it off. The beauty of digital photography is that it's virtually free to experiment with such setting & gain some experience with the different settings & what works best & where. I don't like to use the flash much as it can show harsh shadows, but at home my living room lighting usually leaves gold haze so it needs the flash. Lastly, if your camera has a custom WB mode, you may whish to learn how to set it & consider that option too! Now there is a bit in my manual about custom white balance. It says to hold up a piece of paper under the light source so that it fills the entire screen then press shutter button. Its not clear, when I hold the paper up, do I photograph just the paper with the light behind it? Best of luck, I hope some of this is helpful to you. Much help thankyou. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:11:45 +0100, "Beck"
opined: My camera has various white balance modes and I am unsure about 4 of them... 1. Shooting under "daylight" flourescent lamps 2. Shooting under "warm white" flourescent lamps 3. Shooting under "cool white" flourescent lamps 4. Shooting in incandescent light How do I know which of these above conditions is the condition I am in at the time? Well, short of using spectrometer, you just have to estimate it - especially as it's common to get mixed lighting, such as a room with a sunny window that also has fluorescent lighting. If your camera has the feature, it's often best to put a white piece of cardboard (or other white object) in place of the subject, shoot a test shot, & set your cameras white balance from that. If your camera supports it, one of the best methods is to shoot in 'RAW' mode (rather than 'JPEG' mode), where the white balance can be changed *after* you take the shot & have uploaded it into your computer for processing. Typically, you can then set the white balance by simply clicking an eyedropper on an area of the shot that you know is white, such as (for example) a note pad, foam plastic cup, or a white shirt/blouse. In fact, one sneaky trick I invented myself is fast & very effective for people shots under mixed lighting, when there's nothing white or grey in the shot at all. The method is to enlarge the subject's face to 100%, then take a white balance from the white of one of their eyes. This nearly always gets you a reasonable white balance, which you can then tweak a little towards yellow (to compensate for the yellow cast that most people have in their sclera) to get it dead on. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
white balance
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:57:20 +0100, "Beck"
opined: Andreas Thaler wrote: IMO it's a matter of taste with all that white balance stuff. AUTO ist the most convenient mode if you are editing your pictures on the PC/Mac you can easily finetune afterwards. There are many types of flourescent lamps so the mentioned presets can only deliver average results. I would do shots with each of this presets ("white balance" bracketing). Does auto usually come up with the best results in your experience? It depends a lot on the brand & model of the camera, the lighting type, & with some, even the shooting mode. IME, the AWB on Canons (10D & 1Dmk2) do very well under indirect sunlight, but can be very inconsistant under artificial lighting, even when the light's strongly dominated by a single colour temperature. I'm afraid your question is one of those "how long is a piece of string" kind of questions, so you'll need to narrow it down a lot to get a useful answer. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Correct White Balance Doesn't Mean Correct Color?? | Dave Martindale | Digital Photography | 3 | December 27th 05 05:10 AM |
Correct White Balance Doesn't Mean Correct Color?? | MarkČ | Digital Photography | 0 | October 21st 05 07:52 AM |
EOS 1D Mk2 custom white balance problem | Graham Russell | Digital Photography | 5 | March 26th 05 05:36 PM |
EOS 1D Mk2 custom white balance problem | Graham Russell | Digital Photography | 0 | March 26th 05 11:20 AM |
Canon S1 IS (and others) White Balance: Auto / Presets / Cusom | Renee | Digital Photography | 7 | January 5th 05 03:29 PM |