If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg?dl=0 -- PeterN |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. The image tells me what to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0 -- PeterN |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsn...0Lighthouse.jp g I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. The image tells me what to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0 ....er, OK... -- Regards, Savageduck |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On 10/12/2017 11:00 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsn...0Lighthouse.jp g I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. The image tells me what to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0 ...er, OK... And sometimes it tells me to do this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zza0n01cabpmecj/20170205_Flowers_0056.jpg?dl=0 -- PeterN |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On 12-Oct-17 4:00 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsn...0Lighthouse.jp g I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. The image tells me what to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0 ...er, OK... That seem like a nonsense response to me. :-( David B. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ): On 10/12/2017 11:00 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. The image tells me what to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0 ...er, OK... And sometimes it tells me to do this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zza0n01cabpmecj/20170205_Flowers_0056.jpg?dl=0 Again, OK! ....but WTF do any of those PeterN manipulations have to do with gum stuck to an alley wall, or Jackson Pollock? -- Regards, Savageduck |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On Oct 12, 2017, David_B wrote
(in article ): On 12-Oct-17 4:00 PM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. The image tells me what to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0 ...er, OK... That seem like a nonsense response to me. :-( David B. Both responses, the one from Peter, and mine were nonsense responses. Peter is always being instructed on what to do by his images, and he emphasized that in his follow up post. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Care for Some Gum?
On 10/12/2017 12:32 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 11:00 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote (in article ): On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck said: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3. https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg Now that's my type of image. I thought you might like the concept.;-) I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing and mix of color. Actually Pollack is not pure random. I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates. His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art Institute in Utica, NY. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg My concept of abstract is determined by the original image. https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to the original image. The image tells me what to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0 ...er, OK... And sometimes it tells me to do this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zza0n01cabpmecj/20170205_Flowers_0056.jpg?dl=0 Again, OK! ...but WTF do any of those PeterN manipulations have to do with gum stuck to an alley wall, or Jackson Pollock? They are not intended to remind someone that they were at a certain place, or saw some object. They are designed to create a feeling. I will be one of the first to agree that probably more people don't like it, than do. Can't say for sure, I never took a survey. If I like it, that's all that counts. If someone else likes it, good. I have made someone else happy. We had a theme competition at my CC. The theme was hands. Here is an unmanipulated copy of my winning image, and my first runner-up, although, obviously neither are human hands. The concept is that my images are intended to be interpretations and representations. https://www.dropbox.com/s/dxhgrljhcp97mbi/Hand%20of%20Nature.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/mxkrww5aty119ut/Hands%20And%20a%20Foot.jpg?dl=0 -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Care For Some Gum? | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 1 | November 5th 14 05:13 PM |
Does anybody really care . . . | Russell D. | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | August 26th 12 04:16 AM |
Why to care for our customers?? | Gungun | Digital Photography | 0 | March 20th 08 03:01 AM |
Negatran Care | John Rice | In The Darkroom | 1 | April 11th 06 06:01 AM |
The care of lenses | John | Large Format Photography Equipment | 3 | February 2nd 04 10:59 PM |