A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Buying new digital camera



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th 13, 09:04 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Jake29
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Buying new digital camera

I lost the digital camera that I had and I need to buy a new one.

The one I had was a Kodak-something (I forget the model number), and the one
that I had before that was a Kodak EasyShare V1253. I lost the last one
and the V1253 died on me for some reason.

Both cameras were point-and-shoot digital cameras. Both had fairly high
megapixels and a fairly high zoom. What I liked about both of them is that
they both had rechargeable Li-Ion batteries that lasted a long time on each
charge -- a feature that I definitely want.

It looks like Kodak is out of the digital camera business, so apparently I
can't buy another Kodak digital camera. If I could, I would.

So, I am looking for suggestions of a new point-and-shoot digital camera. I
definitely don't want one that uses AA batteries (rechargeable or not) as
many of them seem to do these days -- I want one with a rechargeable Li-Ion
battery.

I like the plain flat version of digital cameras that I can just keep in my
pocket; not the bigger size cameras that are out there. I am expecting the
cost to be less that about $200. If it has the right battery type
(rechargeable Li-Ion), a fairly high megapixel rating, and a fairly high
optical zoom, that would be great.

I don't do any fancy or professional picture taking -- mostly just people
and events that I go to (birthday parties, etc.). I do use a camera a lot
for taking photos of construction work in progress while rehabbing
properties that I own -- to record wiring, plumbing, etc. before the walls
are closed up etc.

I am looking for any suggestions that people here may have regarding which
brand and model camera to buy.

I will read all replies and will follow up here with more info etc. if
needed.

Thanks.


  #2  
Old June 29th 13, 10:32 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
newshound
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 458
Default Buying new digital camera

On 29/06/2013 21:54, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:04:52 -0400, "Jake29"
wrote:

I lost the digital camera that I had and I need to buy a new one.


All excellent advice from Tony, the only thing I would add is that I
wouldn't buy anything without a viewfinder. Firstly, you can hold the
camera much more securely with two hands and against your face than
holding it some distance in front of you while looking at the screen.
Secondly, you'll have no trouble framing your shot in sunlight or
otherwise awkward lighting conditions.

Last time I looked this restricted you to one or two Canons at the
budget end of the market.

  #3  
Old June 30th 13, 02:34 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Jake29[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Buying new digital camera

"Tony Cooper" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:04:52 -0400, "Jake29"
wrote:

So, I am looking for suggestions of a new point-and-shoot digital camera.
I
definitely don't want one that uses AA batteries (rechargeable or not) as
many of them seem to do these days -- I want one with a rechargeable
Li-Ion
battery.

I am looking for any suggestions that people here may have regarding which
brand and model camera to buy.


My suggestion is to go to a store like Best Buy, Target, Wal-Mart, etc
where they have a row of point-and-shoots for you to choose from.
Don't go to a camera store where the clerk has to pull each out for
you to examine.

Handle all of the Nikon and Canon point-and-shoots (they are the two
brands with the most models in the price range you describe) and
determine which one(s) fit your hand and your pocket. Operate the
controls to see which one is easiest for you to view the menus and
change the settings. Make sure the shutter release and menu controls
are in a position that makes it easy for you to use.

Make sure the zoom control is smooth and easy for you to use. You
should only be concerned about the *optical* zoom. The *digital* zoom
is practically worthless. Labels will mislead you. Some cameras brag
about total zoom, but include the digital zoom in that figure. Look
closer at just the optical zoom figure.

I disagree with your preference about AA batteries, but it's your
camera and your money. My in-the-car point-and-shoot (my regular
camera is a Nikon DSLR) uses rechargeable AA batteries and shoots RAW
and has manual settings. I like the idea that if I haven't used it
for a while, and the batteries are flat, I can buy regular AA
batteries at any store and use them. If my Nikon Li-Ion battery goes
flat, I have to go home to charge it. (Well, *I* don't, but I have
three batteries and always carry charged spares.)

With the features you want, there's not an eyelash's difference
between similarly priced Nikon and Canon point-and-shoots. You aren't
looking for RAW, manual controls, or other bells and whistles.
There are other brands that are equal to Nikon and Canon, but I'm
trying to keep it simple here.

The way the camera fits your hand, and the ease of use for you, are
more important considerations than brand and model.

The camera makers are always coming out with new models, and stores
like to move out discontinued models. I recently purchased a Nikon
point-and-shoot for $99 at H.H. Gregg that had sold the week before
for over $200. I gave it to a relative. Replacement parts aren't a
consideration, so discontinued models are worth buying.

About megapixels...most of the cameras you'll see are about the same
in models in the same price range. But, big megapixel numbers are
really only important to people who want to make large prints. The
difference between a 12 megapixel camera and a 24 megapixel camera
will not been seen in a 4" x 6" print. On a computer screen, not even
discernable. Megapixel numbers ceased to be important for the
point-and-shoot user once all cameras started offering over 4 or 5
megapixels unless the intent is to print posters.


Thanks. That's a ton of great information.

I'll do what you suggested about going to places like Best Buy, Target, etc.
I did go to WalMart and the cameras were all chained down, so I couldn't
really figure out which cameras had which features and what type of battery
they used etc. But, I'll try the other stores.

I did notice that the descriptions talk about optical zoom and digital zoom,
so now I know to just focus on the optical zoom part.

Part of why I am interested in higher megapixels is that I sometimes take
photos of a high part of a building or a chimney etc. that needs work, but
from ground level. Then, when I get the photos on my computer, I can zoom
in and see more detail about the condition of the chimney etc. I don't know
if higher megapixels really makes a difference in my being able to do that,
but with the cameras that I had in the past that was a great feature.

One other thing that I sometimes need to do is take pictures of rooms (like
a bathroom or kitchen) that has been remodeled, and it would be good to be
able to take a wider angle shot if possible to get more of the room in one
picture. I have seen cameras that say "wide angle", but after reading more
about some of that, it appears that the only truly "wide angle" cameras are
the higher end ones that are not "point and shoot". But, I thought I'd
mention that in case there is anything I should look for in terms of "wide
angle" on the point and shoot cameras.

  #4  
Old June 30th 13, 02:38 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Jake29[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Buying new digital camera

"newshound" wrote in message
o.uk...
On 29/06/2013 21:54, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:04:52 -0400, "Jake29"
wrote:

I lost the digital camera that I had and I need to buy a new one.


All excellent advice from Tony, the only thing I would add is that I
wouldn't buy anything without a viewfinder. Firstly, you can hold the
camera much more securely with two hands and against your face than
holding it some distance in front of you while looking at the screen.
Secondly, you'll have no trouble framing your shot in sunlight or
otherwise awkward lighting conditions.

Last time I looked this restricted you to one or two Canons at the budget
end of the market.


Thanks. I'll definitely look for that about the viewfinder. I know exactly
what you mean about keeping the camera stable and being able to see what I
am trying to photograph on a sunny day without a viewfinder. I do get that
the viewfinder feature may just be in higher end cameras but I'll look for
that anyway and see what's out there.



  #5  
Old June 30th 13, 03:09 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Buying new digital camera

In article , Jake29
wrote:

My suggestion is to go to a store like Best Buy, Target, Wal-Mart, etc
where they have a row of point-and-shoots for you to choose from.
Don't go to a camera store where the clerk has to pull each out for
you to examine.


I'll do what you suggested about going to places like Best Buy, Target, etc.
I did go to WalMart and the cameras were all chained down, so I couldn't
really figure out which cameras had which features and what type of battery
they used etc. But, I'll try the other stores.


it's actually bad advice.

first, go to a camera store and talk to a salesperson who has a
reasonable understanding of the various models. you want someone with a
clue, which you will *not* find in a big box store, to answer any
questions you may have. some camera stores are better than others, so
try to find a store that caters towards pros rather than a mall store.

once you have an idea of the various models and the different features
available, *then* go to a big box store where you can play with them
for as long as you want without bothering a salesperson.

keep in mind that a lot of times, the cameras at a big box store will
not work properly or have dead batteries or some other issue and nobody
there really cares one way or the other.

I did notice that the descriptions talk about optical zoom and digital zoom,
so now I know to just focus on the optical zoom part.


ignore digital zoom. it's nothing that can't be done on a computer.

Part of why I am interested in higher megapixels is that I sometimes take
photos of a high part of a building or a chimney etc. that needs work, but
from ground level. Then, when I get the photos on my computer, I can zoom
in and see more detail about the condition of the chimney etc. I don't know
if higher megapixels really makes a difference in my being able to do that,
but with the cameras that I had in the past that was a great feature.


sounds like you want a longer focus lens for that.

One other thing that I sometimes need to do is take pictures of rooms (like
a bathroom or kitchen) that has been remodeled, and it would be good to be
able to take a wider angle shot if possible to get more of the room in one
picture. I have seen cameras that say "wide angle", but after reading more
about some of that, it appears that the only truly "wide angle" cameras are
the higher end ones that are not "point and shoot". But, I thought I'd
mention that in case there is anything I should look for in terms of "wide
angle" on the point and shoot cameras.


then you also need a wide angle lens.

most p&s cameras won't go that wide, but some may have accessory lenses
to go wider. unfortunately, those aren't usually of the best quality.

if you really need to do interior shots with a very wide angle lens,
you really don't want a p&s compact. a much better choice is something
with interchangeable lenses, either an slr or a mirrorless.
  #6  
Old June 30th 13, 03:33 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
J. Clarke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,273
Default Buying new digital camera

In article , tonycooper214
@gmail.com says...

On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 21:34:16 -0400, "Jake29"
wrote:

"Tony Cooper" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:04:52 -0400, "Jake29"
wrote:

So, I am looking for suggestions of a new point-and-shoot digital camera.
I
definitely don't want one that uses AA batteries (rechargeable or not) as
many of them seem to do these days -- I want one with a rechargeable
Li-Ion
battery.

I am looking for any suggestions that people here may have regarding which
brand and model camera to buy.


My suggestion is to go to a store like Best Buy, Target, Wal-Mart, etc
where they have a row of point-and-shoots for you to choose from.
Don't go to a camera store where the clerk has to pull each out for
you to examine.

Handle all of the Nikon and Canon point-and-shoots (they are the two
brands with the most models in the price range you describe) and
determine which one(s) fit your hand and your pocket. Operate the
controls to see which one is easiest for you to view the menus and
change the settings. Make sure the shutter release and menu controls
are in a position that makes it easy for you to use.

Make sure the zoom control is smooth and easy for you to use. You
should only be concerned about the *optical* zoom. The *digital* zoom
is practically worthless. Labels will mislead you. Some cameras brag
about total zoom, but include the digital zoom in that figure. Look
closer at just the optical zoom figure.

I disagree with your preference about AA batteries, but it's your
camera and your money. My in-the-car point-and-shoot (my regular
camera is a Nikon DSLR) uses rechargeable AA batteries and shoots RAW
and has manual settings. I like the idea that if I haven't used it
for a while, and the batteries are flat, I can buy regular AA
batteries at any store and use them. If my Nikon Li-Ion battery goes
flat, I have to go home to charge it. (Well, *I* don't, but I have
three batteries and always carry charged spares.)

With the features you want, there's not an eyelash's difference
between similarly priced Nikon and Canon point-and-shoots. You aren't
looking for RAW, manual controls, or other bells and whistles.
There are other brands that are equal to Nikon and Canon, but I'm
trying to keep it simple here.

The way the camera fits your hand, and the ease of use for you, are
more important considerations than brand and model.

The camera makers are always coming out with new models, and stores
like to move out discontinued models. I recently purchased a Nikon
point-and-shoot for $99 at H.H. Gregg that had sold the week before
for over $200. I gave it to a relative. Replacement parts aren't a
consideration, so discontinued models are worth buying.

About megapixels...most of the cameras you'll see are about the same
in models in the same price range. But, big megapixel numbers are
really only important to people who want to make large prints. The
difference between a 12 megapixel camera and a 24 megapixel camera
will not been seen in a 4" x 6" print. On a computer screen, not even
discernable. Megapixel numbers ceased to be important for the
point-and-shoot user once all cameras started offering over 4 or 5
megapixels unless the intent is to print posters.


Thanks. That's a ton of great information.

I'll do what you suggested about going to places like Best Buy, Target, etc.
I did go to WalMart and the cameras were all chained down, so I couldn't
really figure out which cameras had which features and what type of battery
they used etc. But, I'll try the other stores.


The are chained down in every store I've ever been to. However, they
are also connected to a power source so you can activate the camera
and go through the menus. The chain doesn't interfere with getting
the "feel" of the camera in your hands. If one is not connected, have
the clerk do so.

I'd go for one with an optical viewfinder, but I don't see them around
at that price range. Or at all.

I did notice that the descriptions talk about optical zoom and digital zoom,
so now I know to just focus on the optical zoom part.

Part of why I am interested in higher megapixels is that I sometimes take
photos of a high part of a building or a chimney etc. that needs work, but
from ground level. Then, when I get the photos on my computer, I can zoom
in and see more detail about the condition of the chimney etc. I don't know
if higher megapixels really makes a difference in my being able to do that,
but with the cameras that I had in the past that was a great feature.


Well, the difference isn't going to be that great in megapixels if you
compare at price levels. They're all up there now. The trick is to
avoid going to full zoom if the full zoom goes into the digital zoom
range. That's the way most, or all, work. The digital zoom increases
the size of what you see, but loses the detail of what you capture.
Most point-and-shoots have a line on an icon on the screen that tells
you when you are going from optical to digital.

One other thing that I sometimes need to do is take pictures of rooms (like
a bathroom or kitchen) that has been remodeled, and it would be good to be
able to take a wider angle shot if possible to get more of the room in one
picture. I have seen cameras that say "wide angle", but after reading more
about some of that, it appears that the only truly "wide angle" cameras are
the higher end ones that are not "point and shoot". But, I thought I'd
mention that in case there is anything I should look for in terms of "wide
angle" on the point and shoot cameras.


Point-and-shoots can be used for panoramas. It's software that
creates a panorama using a point and shoot*, and Elements will do
that. Elements would be worth having for other purposes. A tripod or
monopod is almost essential for a panorama. A panorama is better than
a wide angle shot with a point and shoot because the widest setting
can (not will) produce distortion at the edges. Shoot the panorama
images in portrait, not landscape.

*Some point-and-shoots do in-camera stitching, but I don't think
that's a feature in your price range of cameras. I may be wrong.

There are some generalities above, and some cameras may be an
exception.


FWIW, the Canon SX500 is on sale right now for 199 at Best Buy, it zooms
out to 720mm equivalent and in to 24mm equivalent. It's a bit bulky
though.
  #7  
Old June 30th 13, 03:44 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Buying new digital camera

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

I'll do what you suggested about going to places like Best Buy, Target, etc.
I did go to WalMart and the cameras were all chained down, so I couldn't
really figure out which cameras had which features and what type of battery
they used etc. But, I'll try the other stores.


The are chained down in every store I've ever been to. However, they
are also connected to a power source so you can activate the camera
and go through the menus. The chain doesn't interfere with getting
the "feel" of the camera in your hands. If one is not connected, have
the clerk do so.


by chained down, he most likely means tied down to the display, so you
can't pick it up at *all*. some stores do that. others don't.

at the stores where the cameras are on a tether (i.e., not chained
down) you can try them out, but many times they're not connected to a
power supply and the battery might not have a full charge or it's
missing entirely.
  #8  
Old June 30th 13, 08:29 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
David Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,146
Default Buying new digital camera

On 29/06/2013 21:04, Jake29 wrote:
[]
I like the plain flat version of digital cameras that I can just keep in my
pocket; not the bigger size cameras that are out there. I am expecting the
cost to be less that about $200. If it has the right battery type
(rechargeable Li-Ion), a fairly high megapixel rating, and a fairly high
optical zoom, that would be great.

[]
Thanks.


Based on previous experience, I would recommend the Panasonic range,
such as:


http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/01...-DMC-ZS25-TZ35

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
  #9  
Old June 30th 13, 01:15 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
James Silverton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 123
Default Buying new digital camera

On 6/30/2013 3:29 AM, David Taylor wrote:
On 29/06/2013 21:04, Jake29 wrote:
[]
I like the plain flat version of digital cameras that I can just keep
in my
pocket; not the bigger size cameras that are out there. I am
expecting the
cost to be less that about $200. If it has the right battery type
(rechargeable Li-Ion), a fairly high megapixel rating, and a fairly high
optical zoom, that would be great.

[]
Thanks.


Based on previous experience, I would recommend the Panasonic range,
such as:


http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/01...-DMC-ZS25-TZ35


To me, the important thing about a point and shoot is that it has an
optical viewfinder for use in bright light.

--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not." in Reply To.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How To Go About Buying A Digital Camera Info Dude Digital Photography 3 January 17th 07 01:41 PM
How To Go About Buying A Digital Camera Info Dude Digital Photo Equipment For Sale 0 January 13th 07 03:56 PM
Buying the Best Digital Camera for Your Needs Info Dude Digital Photography 5 June 28th 06 11:38 PM
Buying the Best Digital Camera for Your Needs Info Dude Other Photographic Equipment 0 June 28th 06 12:21 PM
Recommendations & Experiences with Buying Digital Camera from I Buy Digital Harpocrates Digital Photography 1 January 25th 05 11:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.