If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Giving photogs a bad name?
"Floyd L. Davidson" wrote in message
... George Kerby wrote: On 6/9/14 9:29 PM, in article , "Floyd L. Davidson" wrote: Floyd. Learn that throwing down ridiculous propositions is NOT "cornering", please. You didn't answer the questions, because they show just what it is that is ridiculous. For one, the idea that "gun control" means "against private ownership" is ridiculous. I own guns, I am very much in favor of significantly increased control of guns. But I am clearly very much in favor of private gun ownership. But why are gun magazines all about assault weapons, not about hunting? We are not permitted to own assualt weapons. Assault weapons are automatic. This constant drone about "assault" weapons is a lie. Just because a rifle resembles a military rifle doesn't make it an assault rifle. You should know that. Why does everyone need a handgun that is too big to shoot and has no purpose other than ego inflation or killing people? Where does the Constitution indicate that a citizen must demonstrate a "need" in order to exercise his/her rights? If I want to get myself a 357 Magnum like Dirty Harry used, then I can. I don't have to demonstrate to anyone whether or not I need one. Does my neighbor who has no kids have to prove he needs that huge GMC Suburban he drives? If he wants it and can afford it, he can buy it. For instance, liberals state that We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works... Funny that you make up things which are false in order to argue something. Why not stick with facts? So you do not see what totally insane hyperboles he suggested is not relevant to a normal conversation without the hysteria of the Gun Control Proles?!? The insanity comes from your side, as seen in what you just said. IN ALASKA?!? My-my... Yes, exactly. A place where guns are clearly necessary and useful. We actually use them for something reasonable. Note that I don't own an AR-15 or an M16. I have no high capacity clips, nor even a gun that can use them. And it's your choice not to own any of those rifles but your choices don't have to be my choices. I have a coworker who is an vocal gun-control supporter. You'll hear him say over and over that "I don't believe anyone should own a gun". His personal beliefs have no bearing on our rights, thankfully. Your choices have no bearing on them either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Giving photogs a bad name? | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 9 | May 20th 14 12:43 AM |
Giving photogs a bad name? | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 4 | May 18th 14 09:30 PM |
Giving up. | Pablo | Digital Photography | 56 | November 7th 12 01:50 PM |
Giving up | Badasghan Lukacina | APS Photographic Equipment | 0 | August 22nd 04 09:11 AM |
Giving up | Beneactiney Redgrave | Film & Labs | 0 | August 21st 04 10:59 PM |