A620 vs A630, A640: different sensor?

I need to replace my broken A620. Reviews and galleries for the A630,
A640 and A710IS show a significant difference in noise; my A620 is
about 2x noisier. Pics taken with an A630 or A640 at ISO400 compare
with my A620 at ISO200, noise-wise; same with A630/A640@ISO800 vs.
A620@ISO400 (equally unusable!)
Any input? Are these different sensors?
How about the A710IS?
Thanks.

Just a comment, the A640 is compatible with PSRemote,
which is useful for making time lapse movies, whereas
the A630 is not.

wrote:
I need to replace my broken A620. Reviews and galleries for the A630,
A640 and A710IS show a significant difference in noise; my A620 is
about 2x noisier. Pics taken with an A630 or A640 at ISO400 compare
with my A620 at ISO200, noise-wise; same with A630/A640@ISO800 vs.
A620@ISO400 (equally unusable!)
Any input? Are these different sensors?
How about the A710IS?
Thanks.

On 3 Oct 2006 19:22:56 -0700, wrote:


Just a comment, the A640 is compatible with PSRemote,
which is useful for making time lapse movies, whereas
the A630 is not.

The A630 "was" a consideration as an addition to my A95 & A610
but Canon again decided to exclude the above feature in the A630(8MP)
but included it in the A640(10MP) just as they did with the A610 &
A620. Sorry Canon choose to remain in the MP war & omit this feature
from the A630. The 8MP 1/1.8" sensor may have been tolerable for my
needs if set to it's lowest ISO, but the 10MP A640 is just a waste for
my needs.

wrote:
I need to replace my broken A620. Reviews and galleries for the A630,
A640 and A710IS show a significant difference in noise; my A620 is
about 2x noisier. Pics taken with an A630 or A640 at ISO400 compare
with my A620 at ISO200, noise-wise; same with A630/A640@ISO800 vs.
A620@ISO400 (equally unusable!)
Any input? Are these different sensors?
How about the A710IS?
Thanks.

The A610, A620, A630 & A640 all have the same "physical" size
sensor, 1/1.8" but each has increasingly greater resolution.
Additionally it looks to me like Canon may be doing more in-camera
image processing to control image noise @ all ISO settings with these
3 new cameras. This may be OK for many but I find the effect
undesirable for my needs. The effect seems most noticeable on the
reds in the sample pictures, here's an example:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_...s/img_0004.jpg

Also did you notice that even Canon's own sample pictures have
been processed through Adobe PS CS on a Mac? Presumably all they did
was reduce file size but even that makes direct comparisons of little
use. Note they opted to do this with the A630, A640 & A710 IS.

Check it out for yourself:

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...categoryid=113

For my needs the larger 2.5" swivel LCD would have been nice
but for the reasons already stated, I'm no longer interested in these
models. For many, I am sure these cameras would meet their needs just
fine & the image noise/issues would likely clean up nicely in post
processing but it's just not for me.

Before I get flamed for being anti-Canon, let me state that I
like most Canon products, own several & have given several to family &
friends.

These include the following cameras:

P&S: G2, A40, A60, A70, A95, A510, A610, S300, S330
DSLR: 300D & 30D

Respectfully, DHB



"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918