If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter
mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the camera. The camera is then internally-cleaned to get rid of any particles left over from the machining process. Nikon contends that much of the dust issues in cameras can originate from this left over material from the manufacturing process rather than from exposing the camera briefly when changing lenses. Why? Because when it is drilled and machined, polycarbonate develops terrific static charges. These charges (unlike a metal body) cause filings, etc, to remain in the body even with post-fabrication cleaning. Further, for dust control during use, Nikon has moved the moire filter further out from the sensor to prevent static from this source. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
Hmmm. Makes sense. But I don't know how that would make me feel. On one hand
apparently all of these years Nikon had very poor quality control if they were sending out cameras with dirty insides. But, apparently it is important enough now to try and clean them out before sending out. Hmmm. I think I will go over an overall lack of quality control. Had they been doing a good job from the start they would have known that drilling and such would leave little bits in the camera. Only an idiot would think otherwise. Which means they just didn't care until it started costing them money it lost customers or warranty repairs, etc. R "RichA" wrote in message oups.com... According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the camera. The camera is then internally-cleaned to get rid of any particles left over from the machining process. Nikon contends that much of the dust issues in cameras can originate from this left over material from the manufacturing process rather than from exposing the camera briefly when changing lenses. Why? Because when it is drilled and machined, polycarbonate develops terrific static charges. These charges (unlike a metal body) cause filings, etc, to remain in the body even with post-fabrication cleaning. Further, for dust control during use, Nikon has moved the moire filter further out from the sensor to prevent static from this source. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
In article , Hebee Jeebes
wrote: Hmmm. Makes sense. But I don't know how that would make me feel. On one hand apparently all of these years Nikon had very poor quality control if they were sending out cameras with dirty insides. But, apparently it is important enough now to try and clean them out before sending out. Hmmm. I think I will go over an overall lack of quality control. Had they been doing a good job from the start they would have known that drilling and such would leave little bits in the camera. Only an idiot would think otherwise. Which means they just didn't care until it started costing them money it lost customers or warranty repairs, etc. R "RichA" wrote in message oups.com... According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the camera. The camera is then internally-cleaned to get rid of any particles left over from the machining process. Nikon contends that much of the dust issues in cameras can originate from this left over material from the manufacturing process rather than from exposing the camera briefly when changing lenses. Why? Because when it is drilled and machined, polycarbonate develops terrific static charges. These charges (unlike a metal body) cause filings, etc, to remain in the body even with post-fabrication cleaning. Further, for dust control during use, Nikon has moved the moire filter further out from the sensor to prevent static from this source. Cue entry of RichA into the thread...... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
After a few months I noticed 2 spots on my D50. I went back and
checked my photos and found the spots were from the start. They're still there and they are still lonely after quite a few lens changes. -- Joan http://www.flickr.com/photos/joan-in-manly "RichA" wrote in message oups.com... : According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter : mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the : camera. The camera is then internally-cleaned to get rid of any : particles left over from the machining process. Nikon contends that : much of the dust issues in cameras can originate from this left over : material from the manufacturing process rather than from exposing the : camera briefly when changing lenses. Why? Because when it is drilled : and machined, polycarbonate develops terrific static charges. These : charges (unlike a metal body) cause filings, etc, to remain in the body : even with post-fabrication cleaning. Further, for dust control during : use, Nikon has moved the moire filter further out from the sensor to : prevent static from this source. : |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
"RichA" wrote in message oups.com... According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the camera. The camera is then internally-cleaned to get rid of any particles left over from the machining process. Nikon contends that much of the dust issues in cameras can originate from this left over material from the manufacturing process rather than from exposing the camera briefly when changing lenses. Why? Because when it is drilled and machined, polycarbonate develops terrific static charges. These charges (unlike a metal body) cause filings, etc, to remain in the body even with post-fabrication cleaning. Further, for dust control during use, Nikon has moved the moire filter further out from the sensor to prevent static from this source. Here we go again ................ I guess there's no life after plastics.... polycarbonate or whatever... Rich, you seem to spend enormous effort and time researching the same trivia.... During that time, I've enjoyed 3 great plastic cameras and actually take photos / souvenirs ;-) Marcel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
Celcius wrote: "RichA" wrote in message oups.com... According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the camera. The camera is then internally-cleaned to get rid of any particles left over from the machining process. Nikon contends that much of the dust issues in cameras can originate from this left over material from the manufacturing process rather than from exposing the camera briefly when changing lenses. Why? Because when it is drilled and machined, polycarbonate develops terrific static charges. These charges (unlike a metal body) cause filings, etc, to remain in the body even with post-fabrication cleaning. Further, for dust control during use, Nikon has moved the moire filter further out from the sensor to prevent static from this source. Here we go again ................ I guess there's no life after plastics.... polycarbonate or whatever... Rich, you seem to spend enormous effort and time researching the same trivia.... Trivia? Not to some. I don't spend anytime researching this stuff. It appears from time to time to anyone doing any reading about cameras. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
Here we go again ................ I guess there's no life after plastics.... polycarbonate or whatever... Rich, you seem to spend enormous effort and time researching the same trivia.... I got into photography at a time when plastic was not thought of in terms of having much quality. Plastic items were "cheap," like toys. Plastic was substituted for metal because it made items cheaper to manufacture, not because it was structurally superior. And the use of plastic generally did little to reduce the prices. Consumers paid the same and they got less. When one grows up with that view of plastic, it is no wonder that we remain opposed to plastic items throughout our entire lifetimes. And, yes, I realize that polycarbonate has advantages over metal in some areas. No matter. I'll hang on to my classic metal-bodies cameras and lenses for a few more decades. No offense to those that appreciate the quality of their plastic lens barrels. I just can't bring myself to get overly excited over plastic. I am fortunate in that I've accumulated just about everything I could want while it was still readily available. The supply of excellent metal stuff is shrinking, and there is very little coming into the pipeline as new. Every time I walk into a store and pick up a plastic film camera, I just shake my head and put it down. It must be a conditioned response. It is a pity that so many younger photographers have never had occasion to work with classic legacy equipment--the kind that could stand falling off of a chair and not cracking. http://www.photo.net/photo/old-slrs |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
jeremy wrote:
Every time I walk into a store and pick up a plastic film camera, I just shake my head and put it down. It must be a conditioned response. It is a pity that so many younger photographers have never had occasion to work with classic legacy equipment--the kind that could stand falling off of a chair and not cracking. I had my D70 fall out of a Ford Explorer with no issue. Broke the lens hood, the camera did not have a mark and the 18-70 lens that was on it at the time survived unscathed as well. The PolyCarbonate bodies are pretty solid these days ... at least, the D70 body is. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: D281 77A5 63EE 82C5 5E68 00E4 7868 0ADC 4EFB 39F0 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
"jeremy" wrote in message
news:HBFah.5380$ki3.5076@trndny01... pity that so many younger photographers have never had occasion to work with classic legacy equipment--the kind that could stand falling off of a chair and not cracking. But who really cares if the case cracks or dents? With any camera, be it film or digital, I'm MUCH more concerned with the inner components not becoming damaged from the impact, and metal cases don't seem to help. That's why I don't drop my cameras. :-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Plastic cameras and the dust issue (Nikon's findings)
On 27 Nov 2006 09:23:51 -0800, "RichA" wrote:
Celcius wrote: "RichA" wrote in message oups.com... According to Nikon, they've begun a process whereby the shutter mechanism on each D80 is fired a few times prior to shipping the camera. The camera is then internally-cleaned to get rid of any particles left over from the machining process. Nikon contends that much of the dust issues in cameras can originate from this left over material from the manufacturing process rather than from exposing the camera briefly when changing lenses. Why? Because when it is drilled and machined, polycarbonate develops terrific static charges. These charges (unlike a metal body) cause filings, etc, to remain in the body even with post-fabrication cleaning. Further, for dust control during use, Nikon has moved the moire filter further out from the sensor to prevent static from this source. Here we go again ................ I guess there's no life after plastics.... polycarbonate or whatever... Rich, you seem to spend enormous effort and time researching the same trivia.... Trivia? Not to some. I don't spend anytime researching this stuff. It appears from time to time to anyone doing any reading about cameras. Are you saying that you merely regurgitate stuff you trip across? Are you saying you do not spend any time to determine the veracity of your posts? Says ... and explains ... quite a lot. I would be interested in your source for this Plastic, Dust, Nikon thread. I suspect you are leaving out something crucial. I have a hard time believing that test-firing the D80 is a new manufacturing step for Nikon. I would think that is and has always been a set in the overall QC process. Y'know, to make sure the darned thing works before it goes into the box. I also have a hard time believing that Nikon is using drilled and machined polycarbonate for its camera bodies when it would be much easier to mold. I have an even harder time believing that Nikon is having dust-related problems with static "cling" and not having problems with static discharge. TR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The irony of plastic use in DSLRs and other cameras | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 19 | September 18th 06 09:45 PM |
Nikon's New Life & Style Cameras | newcamz.blogspot.com | Digital Photography | 2 | August 29th 06 06:08 AM |
Why plastic is trash for cameras | Rich | Digital SLR Cameras | 62 | September 7th 05 01:37 AM |
Question re Dust in Sensor Issue | Babysinister | Digital Photography | 22 | April 15th 05 04:38 AM |
Dust becomming a major DSLR issue? | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 30 | March 14th 05 09:59 PM |