If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
A reliable member of another online forum has posted
an email reply he received from an official at A&O; it clearly states that *Rodinal production will continue.* Anyone interested can email me for a link... "Excelsior, you fathead!" -Chris- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
Rodinal is one of the worst developers made. It's popularity is
baffling to any rational person. wrote: A reliable member of another online forum has posted an email reply he received from an official at A&O; it clearly states that *Rodinal production will continue.* Anyone interested can email me for a link... "Excelsior, you fathead!" -Chris- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
Rodinal is one of the worst developers made. Its popularity is baffling
to any rational person. wrote: A reliable member of another online forum has posted an email reply he received from an official at A&O; it clearly states that *Rodinal production will continue.* Anyone interested can email me for a link... "Excelsior, you fathead!" -Chris- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
Rodinal is one of the worst developers made. Its popularity is baffling
to any rational person. wrote: A reliable member of another online forum has posted an email reply he received from an official at A&O; it clearly states that *Rodinal production will continue.* Anyone interested can email me for a link... "Excelsior, you fathead!" -Chris- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
nailer wrote: in what aspect Rodinal is bad? 1) It does not yield very full shadow speed compared to other develpers in its class 2) It produces coarser grain, especially with fast films, than other developers in its class 3) It produces worse definition than other developers in its class Its only benefit seems to be longevity, especially after opening. I would not use it on 35mm film, except the very slowest. Almost any developer one can name is better in technical qualaities.. does it have some good properties? if not, why do you think so? On 9 Jan 2006 08:22:37 -0800, "UC" wrote: #Rodinal is one of the worst developers made. It's popularity is #baffling to any rational person. # # wrote: # A reliable member of another online forum has posted # an email reply he received from an official at A&O; it # clearly states that *Rodinal production will continue.* # # Anyone interested can email me for a link... # # "Excelsior, you fathead!" # -Chris- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
Rob Novak wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:00:47 GMT, nailer wrote: does it have some good properties? if not, why do you think so? Don't feed the troll. UC-to-English Translator: "You don't use what I use, so you're wrong and you suck." I happen to know things that people who have not bothered to do the research don't know. That's why I use what I use, because I know better than those who get their information from hearsay. -- Strange, Geometrical Hinges: http://rob.rnovak.net |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
Mike wrote: I happen to know things that people who have not bothered to do the research don't know. That's why I use what I use, because I know better than those who get their information from hearsay. In my 3 years of developing, I've used Xtol, D76, HC110, Microphen, DD-X, Rodinal, and probably a few more. Rodinal is one of my favorites and I don't care what you think. Photography is for MY satisfaction and NOT YOURS. What will you do if your precious Acutol is taken off the market? Rodinal is measurably inferior to almost every other developer, so I don't care what you think... Its popularity is due to photgraphers' stupidity... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
Mike wrote: I happen to know things that people who have not bothered to do the research don't know. That's why I use what I use, because I know better than those who get their information from hearsay. In my 3 years of developing, I've used Xtol, D76, HC110, Microphen, DD-X, Rodinal, and probably a few more. Rodinal is one of my favorites and I don't care what you think. Photography is for MY satisfaction and NOT YOURS. What will you do if your precious Acutol is taken off the market? THREE YEARS? Look, sonny, I have FORTY years of experience. Rodinal is measurably inferior to almost every other developer, so I don't care what you think... Its popularity is due to photgraphers' stupidity... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
Mike wrote: I happen to know things that people who have not bothered to do the research don't know. That's why I use what I use, because I know better than those who get their information from hearsay. In my 3 years of developing, I've used Xtol, D76, HC110, Microphen, DD-X, Rodinal, and probably a few more. Rodinal is one of my favorites and I don't care what you think. Photography is for MY satisfaction and NOT YOURS. What will you do if your precious Acutol is taken off the market? THREE YEARS? Look, sonny, I have FORTY years of experience. Rodinal is demonstrably inferior to almost every other developer, so I don't care what you think... Its popularity is due to photgraphers' stupidity. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Good news about Rodinal
UC wrote:
Rodinal is measurably inferior to almost every other developer, so I don't care what you think... Oh, but you do care enough to pounce on every Rodinal post. -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good digital POS in linux? | piperut | Digital Photography | 4 | January 28th 06 12:36 AM |
Rodinal - Good news? | [email protected] | In The Darkroom | 0 | January 9th 06 02:07 AM |
Can anyone take a good photograph? | Tom Hudson | 35mm Photo Equipment | 203 | January 6th 05 03:55 PM |
Can anyone take a good photograph? | Tom Hudson | Digital Photography | 272 | January 4th 05 06:56 AM |