If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
It's true that only the medium and high priced DSLRs today are metal.
The lower-end models are plastic. So what happened to DSLRs and formerly, some SLRs? What happened in the years 1983 and later? The camera makers found out the miracle of plastic allowed them to fabricate SLRs out of plastic and sell them to people on the cheap. Or was it actually cheap? No, it wasn't. Metal cameras (the OM-1, OM-2, Nikon FE-2 and FM-2) jumped pretty radically in price just after introduction of plastic (like the T50 Canon) SLRs. The OM-1 went from about $225 to over $300 in one shot. At the time, it was a pretty big jump. IMO, something happened to the economics of SLRs that made the companies grab for more profit by using plastic and reserving metal for the higher-end cameras and jacking-up the prices of pre-existing "entry level" metal SLRs. Remember the Pentax K-1000? It was primarily metal and cost about $175 for the body prior to the introduction of plastic SLRs.. Today, if you want a metal DSLR, you are looking at around $1100 just for a body for a Canon. Nikon you are looking at $1700. So what cause this jump in the average price of a "metal" camera? Some industry watchers had speculated that it was Canon and Nikon's reaction to the growing use of aftermarket lenses, which sapped profitability of SLR systems both companies had. In order to make money on a system, lenses had to be bought because the bodies were just too inexpensive to profit off, especially when sold with a $100 50mm "prime" lens, which most kits came with in those days. IMO, it was the rapid increase in the Japanese standard of living. It forced them to find a way of preventing inflation from driving the price of cameras (SLRS) beyond the reach of too many people. So, they did raise the prices of metal ones, the market was obviously still there, but they introduced plastic ones because they needed to preserve the low-end market and maintain overall profitability. There was nothing preventing the Japanese from introducing plastic SLRs in 1970, except that they weren't faced with the kind of economic pressures (opportunities?) they found 15 years later. -Rich |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
"Rich" wrote in message ... It's true that only the medium and high priced DSLRs today are metal. The lower-end models are plastic. So what happened to DSLRs and formerly, some SLRs? What happened in the years 1983 and later? The camera makers found out the miracle of plastic allowed them to fabricate SLRs out of plastic and sell them to people on the cheap. I used to be a big fan of mag-alloy, but having owned a 'plastic' (actually, a composite fibre reinforced material) dslr for a year or so I've changed my mind. 'plastic' shrugs off the sort of minor knocks and abrasions that would soon have a metal camera looking shabby, and let's not forget the tendency for modern clothing to produce bucketful of static electricity - the 'plastic' camera makes a great insulator against static charge. Of course, there is 'plastic' and 'plastic' - but a well made composite plastic body on a solid steel subframe is a better choice than magnesium alloy, imo. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
"Rich" wrote in message ... It's true that only the medium and high priced DSLRs today are metal. The lower-end models are plastic. So what happened to DSLRs and formerly, some SLRs? What happened in the years 1983 and later? The camera makers found out the miracle of plastic allowed them to fabricate SLRs out of plastic and sell them to people on the cheap. Or was it actually cheap? No, it wasn't. Metal cameras (the OM-1, OM-2, Nikon FE-2 and FM-2) jumped pretty radically in price just after introduction of plastic (like the T50 Canon) SLRs. The OM-1 went from about $225 to over $300 in one shot. At the time, it was a pretty big jump. IMO, something happened to the economics of SLRs that made the companies grab for more profit by using plastic and reserving metal for the higher-end cameras and jacking-up the prices of pre-existing "entry level" metal SLRs. Remember the Pentax K-1000? It was primarily metal and cost about $175 for the body prior to the introduction of plastic SLRs.. Today, if you want a metal DSLR, you are looking at around $1100 just for a body for a Canon. Nikon you are looking at $1700. So what cause this jump in the average price of a "metal" camera? Some industry watchers had speculated that it was Canon and Nikon's reaction to the growing use of aftermarket lenses, which sapped profitability of SLR systems both companies had. In order to make money on a system, lenses had to be bought because the bodies were just too inexpensive to profit off, especially when sold with a $100 50mm "prime" lens, which most kits came with in those days. IMO, it was the rapid increase in the Japanese standard of living. It forced them to find a way of preventing inflation from driving the price of cameras (SLRS) beyond the reach of too many people. So, they did raise the prices of metal ones, the market was obviously still there, but they introduced plastic ones because they needed to preserve the low-end market and maintain overall profitability. There was nothing preventing the Japanese from introducing plastic SLRs in 1970, except that they weren't faced with the kind of economic pressures (opportunities?) they found 15 years later. -Rich I don't buy it. In many cases (no pun intended) plastic actually has a lot of advantages over metal, and as someone else said, there's plastic and there's plastic. Actually, metal bodies may be produced mostly for people who "assume" they are better, and they charge for it. I mean, if you could pick up a plastic DSLR and flex it like a plastic notebook computer I'd side with you, but that's just not the case. And I can't believe the reason has to do with buying off brand lenses. People have been buying off brand lenses for their SLR's for years, and I really don't see Nikon or Canon freaking out about it. Just forces the manufacturers to make their OEM lenses worth what you pay for them. I predict we'll soon see carbon fiber used a lot in high end DSLR's, and that stuff ain't cheap. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
"Sheldon" wrote in message ... I predict we'll soon see carbon fiber used a lot in high end DSLR's, and that stuff ain't cheap. Yes it is. The cost may be significant if you're making a yacht or an aeroplane, but in quantities required for cameras, its for-nothing. -- Jeff R. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
Man:
You sit here, dear. Wife: All right. Man: Morning! Waitress: Morning! Man: Well, what've you got? Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and plastic; egg bacon and plastic; egg bacon sausage and plastic; plastic bacon sausage and plastic; plastic egg plastic plastic bacon and plastic; plastic sausage plastic plastic bacon plastic tomato and plastic; Vikings: Plastic plastic plastic plastic... Waitress: ...plastic plastic plastic egg and plastic; plastic plastic plastic plastic plastic plastic baked beans plastic plastic plastic... Vikings: Plastic! Lovely plastic! Lovely plastic! Waitress: ...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and plastic. Wife: Have you got anything without plastic? Waitress: Well, there's plastic egg sausage and plastic, that's not got much plastic in it. Wife: I don't want ANY plastic! Man: Why can't she have egg bacon plastic and sausage? Wife: THAT'S got plastic in it! Man: Hasn't got as much plastic in it as plastic egg sausage and plastic, has it? Vikings: Plastic plastic plastic plastic... (Crescendo through next few lines...) Wife: Could you do the egg bacon plastic and sausage without the plastic then? Waitress: Urgghh! Wife: What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like plastic! Vikings: Lovely plastic! Wonderful plastic! Waitress: Shut up! Vikings: Lovely plastic! Wonderful plastic! Waitress: Shut up! (Vikings stop) Bloody Vikings! You can't have egg bacon plastic and sausage without the plastic. Wife: I don't like plastic! Man: Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your plastic. I love it. I'm having plastic plastic plastic plastic plastic plastic plastic beaked beans plastic plastic plastic and plastic! Vikings: Plastic plastic plastic plastic. Lovely plastic! Wonderful plastic! Waitress: Shut up!! Baked beans are off. Man: Well could I have her plastic instead of the baked beans then? Waitress: You mean plastic plastic plastic plastic plastic plastic... (but it is too late and the Vikings drown her words) Vikings: (Singing elaborately...) Plastic plastic plastic plastic. Lovely plastic! Wonderful plastic! Plastic pla-a-a-a-a-astic plastic pla-a-a-a-a-astic plastic. Lovely plastic! Lovely plastic! Lovely plastic! Lovely plastic! Lovely plastic! Plastic plastic plastic plastic! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
"Steve Franklin" wrote in message ... Man: You sit here, dear. snip lovely image Thank you, Steve. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
In u,
Jeff R scribed: "Steve Franklin" wrote in message ... Man: You sit here, dear. snip lovely image Thank you, Steve. cue Band of the Grenadier Guards He he! Me too, although I doubt the OP will 'get it' as he both lives on the wrong side of the Pond, and gives every appearance of being an anglophobe. ;-) Nigel |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
Sheldon wrote:
"Rich" wrote in message ... It's true that only the medium and high priced DSLRs today are metal. The lower-end models are plastic. So what happened to DSLRs and formerly, some SLRs? What happened in the years 1983 and later? The camera makers found out the miracle of plastic allowed them to fabricate SLRs out of plastic and sell them to people on the cheap. Or was it actually cheap? No, it wasn't. Metal cameras (the OM-1, OM-2, Nikon FE-2 and FM-2) jumped pretty radically in price just after introduction of plastic (like the T50 Canon) SLRs. The OM-1 went from about $225 to over $300 in one shot. At the time, it was a pretty big jump. Metal prices change. Drastically and quickly. This drives the change to other materials in many, many situations. IMO, something happened to the economics of SLRs that made the companies grab for more profit by using plastic and reserving metal for the higher-end cameras and jacking-up the prices of pre-existing "entry level" metal SLRs. Remember the Pentax K-1000? It was primarily metal and cost about $175 for the body prior to the introduction of plastic SLRs.. Today, if you want a metal DSLR, you are looking at around $1100 just for a body for a Canon. Nikon you are looking at $1700. It's also a fantastically complex body (internally) compared to the earlier models. This drives up cost signficantly, as the demands on the casting process have skyrocketed. So what cause this jump in the average price of a "metal" camera? Price of raw material and increase in complexity. As well, the quantity produced has some effect, like you said. Some industry watchers had speculated that it was Canon and Nikon's reaction to the growing use of aftermarket lenses, which sapped profitability of SLR systems both companies had. In order to make money on a system, lenses had to be bought because the bodies were just too inexpensive to profit off, especially when sold with a $100 50mm "prime" lens, which most kits came with in those days. This is a reasonable theory. Its been a long-standing practice in industry to sell the starter component at cost and reap profits on accessory sales. Only someone internal to the company could verify or disprove this theory. IMO, it was the rapid increase in the Japanese standard of living. It forced them to find a way of preventing inflation from driving the price of cameras (SLRS) beyond the reach of too many people. So, they did raise the prices of metal ones, the market was obviously still there, but they introduced plastic ones because they needed to preserve the low-end market and maintain overall profitability. There was nothing preventing the Japanese from introducing plastic SLRs in 1970, except that they weren't faced with the kind of economic pressures (opportunities?) they found 15 years later. -Rich That's one way of looking at it. So what's the point of all this? You still whine and complain about plastic. Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Metal cameras, what happened to them?
Jeff R wrote:
"Sheldon" wrote in message ... I predict we'll soon see carbon fiber used a lot in high end DSLR's, and that stuff ain't cheap. Yes it is. The cost may be significant if you're making a yacht or an aeroplane, but in quantities required for cameras, its for-nothing. I suspect the demands for detail in the moldings make carbon fiber almost impossible. Having significant fiber in the plastic makes the casting process extremely difficult. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to Buy a Digital Camera | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 18th 05 04:39 PM |
A Review: "Collecting and Using Classic Cameras ", Matanle | Paul | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | September 9th 04 01:20 AM |
Best Price on Digital Cameras. | Joe Walsh | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 18th 04 09:52 AM |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | elchief | In The Darkroom | 3 | April 7th 04 10:20 AM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 10:51 PM |