goodbye rec.photo.digital -hello rec.photo.digital.slr-systems?

"Steve Young" bowtieATbrightdslDOTnet wrote in
:

That is a lie. Not a single vote has been ruled as "invalid" by the
NAN team.

You have the cart before the horse Bill. There is a 5 day period for
discussion and then NAN may take up the case. Don't you remember the
sequence from Full Metal Jacket?

In the FMJ case, someone properly challenged a series of *specific*
votes with compelling evidence and a solid reason for voiding those
votes.

Here is the *official* challenge, with proof..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?E28824999

Message-ID:


The original RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q19813999

Message-ID:


The revised RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?A1A823999

Message-ID:


In the original RESULT, the group failed. There were 2 challenges
made..to the Full Metal Jacket "no" votes, and to the Stromboli "yes"
votes. In the end, the FMJ votes were thrown out, and the Stromboli
votes were upheld by the NAN team. The group passed, solely due to the
Stromboli block of votes.

Not a single vote has been properly challenged for the RPD reorg vote,
with any offered proof of invalidity. The losing side cries "voter
fraud" on almost every CFV, and nothing is ever reversed without
compelling evidence of voter fraud. Unfamiliarity of a voter name is not
grounds for voiding a vote, as there is no previous posting requirement
for voters. In order for this result to be invalidated, you would need to
come up with a list of roughly 250+ invalid votes, and offer proof why
you purport *each* of them to be invalid, above and beyond the claim
that you do not 'recognize' the names.

The RPD reorg vote will stand, and the new groups will be created within
the next few days.

--
Bill

Just one question...

WHO the **** cares?!?!


Woodchuck Bill wrote:

"Steve Young" bowtieATbrightdslDOTnet wrote in
:


That is a lie. Not a single vote has been ruled as "invalid" by the
NAN team.

You have the cart before the horse Bill. There is a 5 day period for
discussion and then NAN may take up the case. Don't you remember the
sequence from Full Metal Jacket?


In the FMJ case, someone properly challenged a series of *specific*
votes with compelling evidence and a solid reason for voiding those
votes.

Here is the *official* challenge, with proof..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?E28824999

Message-ID:


The original RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q19813999

Message-ID:


The revised RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?A1A823999

Message-ID:


In the original RESULT, the group failed. There were 2 challenges
made..to the Full Metal Jacket "no" votes, and to the Stromboli "yes"
votes. In the end, the FMJ votes were thrown out, and the Stromboli
votes were upheld by the NAN team. The group passed, solely due to the
Stromboli block of votes.

Not a single vote has been properly challenged for the RPD reorg vote,
with any offered proof of invalidity. The losing side cries "voter
fraud" on almost every CFV, and nothing is ever reversed without
compelling evidence of voter fraud. Unfamiliarity of a voter name is not
grounds for voiding a vote, as there is no previous posting requirement
for voters. In order for this result to be invalidated, you would need to
come up with a list of roughly 250+ invalid votes, and offer proof why
you purport *each* of them to be invalid, above and beyond the claim
that you do not 'recognize' the names.

The RPD reorg vote will stand, and the new groups will be created within
the next few days.

Matt Ion wrote in
newsQIed.10298$%k.1888@pd7tw2no:

Just one question...

WHO the **** cares?!?!

Obviously not you, but some people apparently do, so please ignore what you
don't want to read and let others carry on as they desire.

--
Bill

Matt Ion wrote in
newsQIed.10298$%k.1888@pd7tw2no:

Just one question...

WHO the **** cares?!?!

Obviously not you, but some people apparently do, so please ignore what you
don't want to read and let others carry on as they desire.

--
Bill

Woodchuck Bill wrote:
"Steve Young" bowtieATbrightdslDOTnet wrote in
:


That is a lie. Not a single vote has been ruled as "invalid" by the
NAN team.

You have the cart before the horse Bill. There is a 5 day period for
discussion and then NAN may take up the case. Don't you remember the
sequence from Full Metal Jacket?


In the FMJ case, someone properly challenged a series of *specific*
votes with compelling evidence and a solid reason for voiding those
votes.

Here is the *official* challenge, with proof..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?E28824999

Message-ID:


The original RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q19813999

Message-ID:


The revised RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?A1A823999

Message-ID:


In the original RESULT, the group failed. There were 2 challenges
made..to the Full Metal Jacket "no" votes, and to the Stromboli "yes"
votes. In the end, the FMJ votes were thrown out, and the Stromboli
votes were upheld by the NAN team. The group passed, solely due to the
Stromboli block of votes.

Not a single vote has been properly challenged for the RPD reorg vote,
with any offered proof of invalidity. The losing side cries "voter
fraud" on almost every CFV, and nothing is ever reversed without
compelling evidence of voter fraud. Unfamiliarity of a voter name is not
grounds for voiding a vote, as there is no previous posting requirement
for voters. In order for this result to be invalidated, you would need to
come up with a list of roughly 250+ invalid votes, and offer proof why
you purport *each* of them to be invalid, above and beyond the claim
that you do not 'recognize' the names.

The RPD reorg vote will stand, and the new groups will be created within
the next few days.


To those that like things the way they are, just post as you normaly
would to the current (apropriate) newsgroup.
Just killfile the NG creation threads and it will seem just like it was
before the vote.
I will do that myself to all three threads that have been clogging up
RPD for the past few weeks.

Considering that all digital cameras and accessories are on topic (ad
will remain on topic) in RPD, it won't make any difference to me.

The new sub-groups will probably wither due to ISPs not subscribing
their servers to them anyway (and the resulting lack of posts).

Have fun complaining either way in this thread, because I will leave you
to it.

Woodchuck Bill wrote:
"Steve Young" bowtieATbrightdslDOTnet wrote in
:


That is a lie. Not a single vote has been ruled as "invalid" by the
NAN team.

You have the cart before the horse Bill. There is a 5 day period for
discussion and then NAN may take up the case. Don't you remember the
sequence from Full Metal Jacket?


In the FMJ case, someone properly challenged a series of *specific*
votes with compelling evidence and a solid reason for voiding those
votes.

Here is the *official* challenge, with proof..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?E28824999

Message-ID:


The original RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q19813999

Message-ID:


The revised RESULT..


http://makeashorterlink.com/?A1A823999

Message-ID:


In the original RESULT, the group failed. There were 2 challenges
made..to the Full Metal Jacket "no" votes, and to the Stromboli "yes"
votes. In the end, the FMJ votes were thrown out, and the Stromboli
votes were upheld by the NAN team. The group passed, solely due to the
Stromboli block of votes.

Not a single vote has been properly challenged for the RPD reorg vote,
with any offered proof of invalidity. The losing side cries "voter
fraud" on almost every CFV, and nothing is ever reversed without
compelling evidence of voter fraud. Unfamiliarity of a voter name is not
grounds for voiding a vote, as there is no previous posting requirement
for voters. In order for this result to be invalidated, you would need to
come up with a list of roughly 250+ invalid votes, and offer proof why
you purport *each* of them to be invalid, above and beyond the claim
that you do not 'recognize' the names.

The RPD reorg vote will stand, and the new groups will be created within
the next few days.


To those that like things the way they are, just post as you normaly
would to the current (apropriate) newsgroup.
Just killfile the NG creation threads and it will seem just like it was
before the vote.
I will do that myself to all three threads that have been clogging up
RPD for the past few weeks.

Considering that all digital cameras and accessories are on topic (ad
will remain on topic) in RPD, it won't make any difference to me.

The new sub-groups will probably wither due to ISPs not subscribing
their servers to them anyway (and the resulting lack of posts).

Have fun complaining either way in this thread, because I will leave you
to it.

Matt Ion wrote:

Just one question...

WHO the **** cares?!?!

If you don't, then (and using your language) you know what to do.

--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--

"Matt Ion" wrote in message
newsQIed.10298$%k.1888@pd7tw2no...
Just one question...

WHO the **** cares?!?!


LOL, you beat me to it Matt

"Woodchuck Bill" wrote in message
...
"Steve Young" bowtieATbrightdslDOTnet wrote in
:

That is a lie. Not a single vote has been ruled as "invalid" by the
NAN team.

You have the cart before the horse Bill. There is a 5 day period for
discussion and then NAN may take up the case. Don't you remember the
sequence from Full Metal Jacket?

In the FMJ case, someone properly challenged a series of *specific*
votes with compelling evidence and a solid reason for voiding those
votes.


Don't you have a life?

"Woodchuck Bill" wrote in message
...
"Steve Young" bowtieATbrightdslDOTnet wrote in
:

That is a lie. Not a single vote has been ruled as "invalid" by the
NAN team.

You have the cart before the horse Bill. There is a 5 day period for
discussion and then NAN may take up the case. Don't you remember the
sequence from Full Metal Jacket?

In the FMJ case, someone properly challenged a series of *specific*
votes with compelling evidence and a solid reason for voiding those
votes.


Don't you have a life?