High resolution photos from a digital camera.

A while back someone referenced Ken Rockwell's article regarding the
quality of digital vs. film. Ken decided to compare what he was
shooting for digital, a Nikon D70, to a 4 x 5 camera. But a D70 and a
4 x 5 large format camera are not meant for the same uses, so this seem
like a bit of an odd comparison to make, at least to me.

A 4 x 5 camera is used for cases where one is taking the time to get a
high resolution photo, if this same time is used with a digital camera
you can also get a high resolution photos with it.

Yesterday I took a 95 MP photo using my digital camera, here is a link
to a overview photo along with a small 100% crop from the photo.
http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/51841148/original

The photos is 15730 by 6000 pixels, just short of a 100 MP photo, it is
a view of the small beach in front of the King Kamehameha hotel, taken
off the Kailua Pier in Kona Hawaii.

For those who have high speed internet and want to see the whole photo
here is a link to that, I compressed it fairly hard to fit it into a 10
MB file, at normal compression it takes about 27 MB.
http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/51841619/original

The photo is of course stitched, it is a way to get a lot of pixels
using a digital camera. This photos does not even come close to what
some others have done, I have seen a 2.5 GP photo. But the high
resolution stitched photos that I have seen to date have been of pretty
static scenes, I wanted something with a bit of a dynamic feel to it,
something where people are doing things in the photo.

I am not trying to tell people that this is a better way to take photos
then using a large format camera, all that I am trying to say is that
some of the limitations that many people believe digital cameras have
are not real limitations at all. The tools to do the stitching are
getting better all the time. I also use a special tripod head that is
designed to take these kind of photos, it cost a fair bit but less then
one good wide angle lens.

BTW the time to take the 36 photos used in the stitching was 1 minute
and 23 seconds.

There are many others that have done far more with stitching that I
have, I thought I would just share the kind of photo that I am takeing
using this method.

Scott

"Scott W" writes:

The photo is of course stitched, it is a way to get a lot of pixels
using a digital camera. This photos does not even come close to what
some others have done, I have seen a 2.5 GP photo. But the high
resolution stitched photos that I have seen to date have been of pretty
static scenes, I wanted something with a bit of a dynamic feel to it,
something where people are doing things in the photo.

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

--
Måns Rullgård

..

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

--

A technique that produces interesting pictures. Stand on the beach and take
photos of a child running into the sea, pan the camera. Stich them together
and get the child in 4 or 5 different places.

John

"Eatmorepies" writes:

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

A technique that produces interesting pictures. Stand on the beach
and take photos of a child running into the sea, pan the
camera. Stich them together and get the child in 4 or 5 different
places.

If that's the effect you want, then sure. If you don't want it,
better be careful. You could also use the technique to entirely
remove moving objects from a photo.

--
Måns Rullgård

Måns Rullgård wrote:
"Eatmorepies" writes:

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

A technique that produces interesting pictures. Stand on the beach
and take photos of a child running into the sea, pan the
camera. Stich them together and get the child in 4 or 5 different
places.

If that's the effect you want, then sure. If you don't want it,
better be careful. You could also use the technique to entirely
remove moving objects from a photo.
One of the things I want to try sometime it to take a lot of photos of
a very busy road
and by combining the right photos together remove all the cars but
leave the people on
the sidewalks, I think it might make for an interesting photo.

Scott

"Scott W" writes:

Måns Rullgård wrote:
"Eatmorepies" writes:

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

A technique that produces interesting pictures. Stand on the beach
and take photos of a child running into the sea, pan the
camera. Stich them together and get the child in 4 or 5 different
places.

If that's the effect you want, then sure. If you don't want it,
better be careful. You could also use the technique to entirely
remove moving objects from a photo.
One of the things I want to try sometime it to take a lot of photos of
a very busy road and by combining the right photos together remove all
the cars but leave the people on the sidewalks, I think it might make
for an interesting photo.

That's an interesting idea. It's a theme that has many variations.

--
Måns Rullgård

"Scott W" wrote in message
ups.com...
SNIP
One of the things I want to try sometime it to take a lot of
photos of a very busy road and by combining the right photos
together remove all the cars but leave the people on the
sidewalks, I think it might make for an interesting photo.

Stitching can accomplish that, just shoot the images in the opposite
order/direction to the traffic flow.

Bart

"Scott W" wrote in message
ups.com...
Måns Rullgård wrote:
"Eatmorepies" writes:

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

A technique that produces interesting pictures. Stand on the beach
and take photos of a child running into the sea, pan the
camera. Stich them together and get the child in 4 or 5 different
places.

If that's the effect you want, then sure. If you don't want it,
better be careful. You could also use the technique to entirely
remove moving objects from a photo.
One of the things I want to try sometime it to take a lot of photos of
a very busy road
and by combining the right photos together remove all the cars but
leave the people on
the sidewalks, I think it might make for an interesting photo.

Scott



This is how one of the shots for the highway scene in Matrix Reloaded was
taken. They taped the highway and stitched parts together to make it look
vacant.

..

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

--

A technique that produces interesting pictures. Stand on the beach and take
photos of a child running into the sea, pan the camera. Stich them together
and get the child in 4 or 5 different places.

John

Måns Rullgård wrote:
"Scott W" writes:

The photo is of course stitched, it is a way to get a lot of pixels
using a digital camera. This photos does not even come close to what
some others have done, I have seen a 2.5 GP photo. But the high
resolution stitched photos that I have seen to date have been of pretty
static scenes, I wanted something with a bit of a dynamic feel to it,
something where people are doing things in the photo.

If people are moving around too much they might end up in several
places in the picture.

Quite true, which is why most panos are of the landscape variety.


--
Ron Hunter