A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 28th 15, 01:27 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

In article ,
RichA wrote:

http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/30/tech...reland/?iid=EL

I guess the rebel, anti-corporate facade is pretty much gone from Apple?


the only dickhead is you.

that link is six months old and it's yet another one of your moronic
anti-apple trolls.

not only is what they're doing *completely legal*, but minimizing taxes
is *expected* and *encouraged*.

numerous other companies do essentially the same thing, including
google, yahoo, cisco and amazon.

even ordinary taxpayers, including yourself, pays as little tax as
possible.

unlike the other companies, however, apple wants to change the the tax
laws so that they're more fair, where they can repatriate the money.
that means they will pay *more* taxes than they currently are, just not
the absurd amounts that the current tax law requires.
  #2  
Old October 28th 15, 08:40 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
sid[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 385
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

nospam wrote:

In article ,
RichA wrote:

http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/30/tech...reland/?iid=EL

I guess the rebel, anti-corporate facade is pretty much gone from Apple?


the only dickhead is you.


Who is the bigger dickhead? The one that posts the troll in the first place
or the one that follows up to the troll with another post exclaiming how
fair and just his object of adulation is?

that link is six months old and it's yet another one of your moronic
anti-apple trolls.

not only is what they're doing *completely legal*, but minimizing taxes
is *expected* and *encouraged*.


Only by the morally bankrupt and greedy.

numerous other companies do essentially the same thing, including
google, yahoo, cisco and amazon.


It's amazing how often you seem to think two wrongs make a right.

even ordinary taxpayers, including yourself, pays as little tax as
possible.


Ordinary tax payers get told how much they have to pay and that's that.
Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend on
tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.

unlike the other companies, however, apple wants to change the the tax
laws so that they're more fair, where they can repatriate the money.
that means they will pay *more* taxes than they currently are, just not
the absurd amounts that the current tax law requires.


If they actually gave two ****s for anything other than the amount of money
they can accumulate they would already be paying taxes at the same rate as
all the other honest companies in the countries in which they extract
exorbitant amounts of money from their customer base.

--
sid
  #3  
Old October 28th 15, 09:27 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

In article , sid
wrote:

http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/30/tech...reland/?iid=EL

I guess the rebel, anti-corporate facade is pretty much gone from Apple?


the only dickhead is you.


Who is the bigger dickhead? The one that posts the troll in the first place
or the one that follows up to the troll with another post exclaiming how
fair and just his object of adulation is?


now that you joined the thread, the biggest dickhead would be you, and
by a mile.

that link is six months old and it's yet another one of your moronic
anti-apple trolls.

not only is what they're doing *completely legal*, but minimizing taxes
is *expected* and *encouraged*.


Only by the morally bankrupt and greedy.


nonsense.

numerous other companies do essentially the same thing, including
google, yahoo, cisco and amazon.


It's amazing how often you seem to think two wrongs make a right.


what two wrongs?

the tax laws are what they are and companies abiding by them is not
wrong. that's how it works.

if you think what the various companies are doing is illegal, then go
contact the relevant authorities. good luck on that one nd be prepared
to be laughed at.

something that you are also ignoring is that apple *wants* to change
the tax laws, resulting in them paying *more* tax. do you hear the
other companies saying that? nope. once again, apple gets bashed for
trying to fix the problems.

even ordinary taxpayers, including yourself, pays as little tax as
possible.


Ordinary tax payers get told how much they have to pay and that's that.


nonsense. nobody can be that stupid.

the irs does *not* tell a taxpayer how much to pay unless they're
delinquent, in which case they have far bigger problems, or if they're
stupid enough to request the irs to give them an amount to pay.

not only do taxpayers take deductions to which they are entitled, but
many of them hire an accountant who understands tax law and knows what
deductions are possible. most people don't because tax law is highly
convoluted and needs to be simplified.

Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend on
tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.


of course it's comparable and there's nothing scammy about it. the only
difference is the amount paid.

unlike the other companies, however, apple wants to change the the tax
laws so that they're more fair, where they can repatriate the money.
that means they will pay *more* taxes than they currently are, just not
the absurd amounts that the current tax law requires.


If they actually gave two ****s for anything other than the amount of money
they can accumulate they would already be paying taxes at the same rate as
all the other honest companies in the countries in which they extract
exorbitant amounts of money from their customer base.


more bull****.
  #4  
Old October 28th 15, 10:51 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
sid[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 385
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

nospam wrote:

In article , sid
wrote:

http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/30/tech...reland/?iid=EL

I guess the rebel, anti-corporate facade is pretty much gone from
Apple?

the only dickhead is you.


Who is the bigger dickhead? The one that posts the troll in the first
place or the one that follows up to the troll with another post
exclaiming how fair and just his object of adulation is?


now that you joined the thread, the biggest dickhead would be you, and
by a mile.


Ooooh, touchy!

that link is six months old and it's yet another one of your moronic
anti-apple trolls.

not only is what they're doing *completely legal*, but minimizing taxes
is *expected* and *encouraged*.


Only by the morally bankrupt and greedy.


nonsense.


It's not nonsense at all, it just depends which side of the fence you're on.


numerous other companies do essentially the same thing, including
google, yahoo, cisco and amazon.


It's amazing how often you seem to think two wrongs make a right.


what two wrongs?


Don't pretend to be dimmer than you already are.

the tax laws are what they are and companies abiding by them is not
wrong. that's how it works.


Well duh.

if you think what the various companies are doing is illegal, then go
contact the relevant authorities. good luck on that one nd be prepared
to be laughed at.


Why are you making things up?

something that you are also ignoring is that apple *wants* to change
the tax laws, resulting in them paying *more* tax. do you hear the
other companies saying that? nope. once again, apple gets bashed for
trying to fix the problems.


I haven't ignored anything, Apples lip service means jack ****.

even ordinary taxpayers, including yourself, pays as little tax as
possible.


Ordinary tax payers get told how much they have to pay and that's that.


nonsense. nobody can be that stupid.


Do you get told what rate of tax you have to pay on whatever it is you tell
the taxman you have earned?

the irs does *not* tell a taxpayer how much to pay unless they're
delinquent, in which case they have far bigger problems, or if they're
stupid enough to request the irs to give them an amount to pay.

not only do taxpayers take deductions to which they are entitled, but
many of them hire an accountant who understands tax law and knows what
deductions are possible. most people don't because tax law is highly
convoluted and needs to be simplified.

Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend
on tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.


of course it's comparable and there's nothing scammy about it. the only
difference is the amount paid.


Yes it is scammy, moving your hq to an island on the other side of the
Atlantic to take advantage of a dodgy governments tax loop holes and pay net
to zero tax, yes that's scammy. You can't do that can you?

unlike the other companies, however, apple wants to change the the tax
laws so that they're more fair, where they can repatriate the money.
that means they will pay *more* taxes than they currently are, just not
the absurd amounts that the current tax law requires.


If they actually gave two ****s for anything other than the amount of
money they can accumulate they would already be paying taxes at the same
rate as all the other honest companies in the countries in which they
extract exorbitant amounts of money from their customer base.


more bull****.


No, I'm afraid it's not.

--
sid
  #5  
Old October 29th 15, 12:28 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:51:42 +0000, sid wrote:

nospam wrote:

In article , sid
wrote:

--- snip ---


the irs does *not* tell a taxpayer how much to pay unless they're
delinquent, in which case they have far bigger problems, or if they're
stupid enough to request the irs to give them an amount to pay.

not only do taxpayers take deductions to which they are entitled, but
many of them hire an accountant who understands tax law and knows what
deductions are possible. most people don't because tax law is highly
convoluted and needs to be simplified.

Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend
on tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.


of course it's comparable and there's nothing scammy about it. the only
difference is the amount paid.


Yes it is scammy, moving your hq to an island on the other side of the
Atlantic to take advantage of a dodgy governments tax loop holes and pay net
to zero tax, yes that's scammy. You can't do that can you?


I disagree. A company is free to organise it's business in any way it
likes, subject only to the laws which govern it's behaviour. Judge
learned hand once said

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Learned_Hand

"Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low
as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will
best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to
increase one's taxes."
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens
  #6  
Old October 29th 15, 03:42 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend
on tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.

of course it's comparable and there's nothing scammy about it. the only
difference is the amount paid.


Yes it is scammy, moving your hq to an island on the other side of the
Atlantic to take advantage of a dodgy governments tax loop holes and pay net
to zero tax, yes that's scammy. You can't do that can you?


I disagree. A company is free to organise it's business in any way it
likes, subject only to the laws which govern it's behaviour. Judge
learned hand once said

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Learned_Hand

"Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low
as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will
best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to
increase one's taxes."


yep.

he also said (and from same link):

Over and over again courts have said that there is nothing sinister
in so arranging one's affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible.
Everybody does so, rich or poor; and all do right, for nobody owes
any public duty to pay more than the law demands: taxes are enforced
exactions, not voluntary contributions. To demand more in the name of
morals is mere cant.
  #7  
Old October 29th 15, 08:38 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
RJH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 228
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEOisn't wearing jeans here!!

On 28/10/2015 23:28, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 21:51:42 +0000, sid wrote:

nospam wrote:

In article , sid
wrote:

--- snip ---


the irs does *not* tell a taxpayer how much to pay unless they're
delinquent, in which case they have far bigger problems, or if they're
stupid enough to request the irs to give them an amount to pay.

not only do taxpayers take deductions to which they are entitled, but
many of them hire an accountant who understands tax law and knows what
deductions are possible. most people don't because tax law is highly
convoluted and needs to be simplified.

Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend
on tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.

of course it's comparable and there's nothing scammy about it. the only
difference is the amount paid.


Yes it is scammy, moving your hq to an island on the other side of the
Atlantic to take advantage of a dodgy governments tax loop holes and pay net
to zero tax, yes that's scammy. You can't do that can you?


I disagree. A company is free to organise it's business in any way it
likes, subject only to the laws which govern it's behaviour.


Yes, of course it is. But most would agree that a US company *should*
pay taxes in the US. Except, of course, those likely to profit from an
offshore tax arrangement. And a few others, whose reasoning defeats me.


--
Cheers, Rob
  #8  
Old October 29th 15, 03:42 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

In article , sid
wrote:


http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/30/tech...reland/?iid=EL

I guess the rebel, anti-corporate facade is pretty much gone from
Apple?

the only dickhead is you.

Who is the bigger dickhead? The one that posts the troll in the first
place or the one that follows up to the troll with another post
exclaiming how fair and just his object of adulation is?


now that you joined the thread, the biggest dickhead would be you, and
by a mile.


Ooooh, touchy!


truth hurts.

that link is six months old and it's yet another one of your moronic
anti-apple trolls.

not only is what they're doing *completely legal*, but minimizing taxes
is *expected* and *encouraged*.

Only by the morally bankrupt and greedy.


nonsense.


It's not nonsense at all, it just depends which side of the fence you're on.


no it doesn't.

do you take tax deductions or do you pay the most you could possibly
pay? if it's the former, you're morally bankrupt and greedy.

numerous other companies do essentially the same thing, including
google, yahoo, cisco and amazon.

It's amazing how often you seem to think two wrongs make a right.


what two wrongs?


Don't pretend to be dimmer than you already are.


it ain't me who is dim.

the tax laws are what they are and companies abiding by them is not
wrong. that's how it works.


Well duh.


at least you agree that apple and the others are not doing anything
wrong.

that pretty much throws your entire rant out the window and makes you
look like a total dickhead.

if you think what the various companies are doing is illegal, then go
contact the relevant authorities. good luck on that one nd be prepared
to be laughed at.


Why are you making things up?


i'm not making anything up.

as i said, if you think *any* of these companies are engaging in tax
fraud or any other illegal activity, get off your duff and contact the
appropriate authorities.

but you won't.

something that you are also ignoring is that apple *wants* to change
the tax laws, resulting in them paying *more* tax. do you hear the
other companies saying that? nope. once again, apple gets bashed for
trying to fix the problems.


I haven't ignored anything, Apples lip service means jack ****.


you're ignoring everything that shows you to be wrong.

even ordinary taxpayers, including yourself, pays as little tax as
possible.

Ordinary tax payers get told how much they have to pay and that's that.


nonsense. nobody can be that stupid.


Do you get told what rate of tax you have to pay on whatever it is you tell
the taxman you have earned?


they tell the rate, but not the *amount*.

if you request a total from the irs, they won't include the various
deductions, so the total will be higher than what it should be. only a
moron would go that route.

the irs does *not* tell a taxpayer how much to pay unless they're
delinquent, in which case they have far bigger problems, or if they're
stupid enough to request the irs to give them an amount to pay.

not only do taxpayers take deductions to which they are entitled, but
many of them hire an accountant who understands tax law and knows what
deductions are possible. most people don't because tax law is highly
convoluted and needs to be simplified.

Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend
on tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.


of course it's comparable and there's nothing scammy about it. the only
difference is the amount paid.


Yes it is scammy, moving your hq to an island on the other side of the
Atlantic to take advantage of a dodgy governments tax loop holes and pay net
to zero tax, yes that's scammy. You can't do that can you?


apple does not pay net zero tax. you're wrong yet again. in fact, they
are among the companies who pay the *most* taxes of any usa
corporation, if not the most.

instead of spouting like you normally do, you might consider finding
out the facts first.

by the way, google did what you accuse apple of doing:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...revenues-shelt
ered-in-no-tax-bermuda-soar-to-10-billion
Google Inc. avoided about $2 billion in worldwide income taxes in
2011 by shifting $9.8 billion in revenues into a Bermuda shell
company, almost double the total from three years before, filings
show.

apple has long had a presence in ireland, including having a factory
there.

unlike the other companies, however, apple wants to change the the tax
laws so that they're more fair, where they can repatriate the money.
that means they will pay *more* taxes than they currently are, just not
the absurd amounts that the current tax law requires.

If they actually gave two ****s for anything other than the amount of
money they can accumulate they would already be paying taxes at the same
rate as all the other honest companies in the countries in which they
extract exorbitant amounts of money from their customer base.


more bull****.


No, I'm afraid it's not.


it is.

you're wrong once again.
  #9  
Old October 29th 15, 10:10 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
sid[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 385
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEO isn't wearing jeans here!!

nospam wrote:


the only dickhead is you.

Who is the bigger dickhead? The one that posts the troll in the first
place or the one that follows up to the troll with another post
exclaiming how fair and just his object of adulation is?

now that you joined the thread, the biggest dickhead would be you, and
by a mile.


Ooooh, touchy!


truth hurts.


It's unusual for you to admit to feeling vulnerable, well done!

not only is what they're doing *completely legal*, but minimizing
taxes is *expected* and *encouraged*.

Only by the morally bankrupt and greedy.

nonsense.


It's not nonsense at all, it just depends which side of the fence you're
on.


no it doesn't.


Yes it does and no amount of you denying it will make opposing business
attitudes to your narrow minded one go away. Deal with it.

do you take tax deductions or do you pay the most you could possibly
pay? if it's the former, you're morally bankrupt and greedy.


I haven't registered my business in a foreign tax haven, no, if that's what
your asking.

numerous other companies do essentially the same thing, including
google, yahoo, cisco and amazon.

It's amazing how often you seem to think two wrongs make a right.

what two wrongs?


Don't pretend to be dimmer than you already are.


it ain't me who is dim.

the tax laws are what they are and companies abiding by them is not
wrong. that's how it works.


Well duh.


at least you agree that apple and the others are not doing anything
wrong.


I challenge you to show where I said they were doing anything illegal, oh
that's right, I didn't. This is another example of you making something up
and basing your argument and your insults on that.

that pretty much throws your entire rant out the window and makes you
look like a total dickhead.


Except I haven't said any such thing in the first place, dickhead!

if you think what the various companies are doing is illegal, then go
contact the relevant authorities. good luck on that one nd be prepared
to be laughed at.


Why are you making things up?


i'm not making anything up.


Yes you are.

as i said, if you think *any* of these companies are engaging in tax
fraud or any other illegal activity, get off your duff and contact the
appropriate authorities.

but you won't.


That's because I haven't said that I do, dickhead!

something that you are also ignoring is that apple *wants* to change
the tax laws, resulting in them paying *more* tax. do you hear the
other companies saying that? nope. once again, apple gets bashed for
trying to fix the problems.


I haven't ignored anything, Apples lip service means jack ****.


you're ignoring everything that shows you to be wrong.


Wrong about what?

even ordinary taxpayers, including yourself, pays as little tax as
possible.

Ordinary tax payers get told how much they have to pay and that's
that.

nonsense. nobody can be that stupid.


Do you get told what rate of tax you have to pay on whatever it is you
tell the taxman you have earned?


they tell the rate, but not the *amount*.


Well that's the point you buffoon, if the tax havens government only says
pay 2% then that's what you do. But *you* can't do that can you?

if you request a total from the irs, they won't include the various
deductions, so the total will be higher than what it should be. only a
moron would go that route.


Only a moron would have got this far in an unnecessary explanation after
misunderstanding the point of the post he was replying to.


Yes it is scammy, moving your hq to an island on the other side of the
Atlantic to take advantage of a dodgy governments tax loop holes and pay
net to zero tax, yes that's scammy. You can't do that can you?


apple does not pay net zero tax. you're wrong yet again. in fact, they
are among the companies who pay the *most* taxes of any usa
corporation, if not the most.


That should be "next to zero." I'm not in USA, they don't pay their fair
share here either. And you didn't even answer the question.

by the way, google did what you accuse apple of doing:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...revenues-shelt
ered-in-no-tax-bermuda-soar-to-10-billion
Google Inc. avoided about $2 billion in worldwide income taxes in
2011 by shifting $9.8 billion in revenues into a Bermuda shell
company, almost double the total from three years before, filings
show.


Why does how Google behave have anything to do with what Apple do. It's that
two wrong things thing again isn't it?

apple has long had a presence in ireland, including having a factory
there.


Well that's fine then isn't it.

--
sid
  #10  
Old October 29th 15, 03:06 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,254
Default Apple may owe Ireland 10 YEARS of back-taxes. Notice dickhead CEOisn't wearing jeans here!!

On 10/28/2015 3:40 PM, sid wrote:
nospam wrote:

In article ,
RichA wrote:

http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/30/tech...reland/?iid=EL

I guess the rebel, anti-corporate facade is pretty much gone from Apple?


the only dickhead is you.


Who is the bigger dickhead? The one that posts the troll in the first place
or the one that follows up to the troll with another post exclaiming how
fair and just his object of adulation is?

that link is six months old and it's yet another one of your moronic
anti-apple trolls.

not only is what they're doing *completely legal*, but minimizing taxes
is *expected* and *encouraged*.


Only by the morally bankrupt and greedy.

numerous other companies do essentially the same thing, including
google, yahoo, cisco and amazon.


It's amazing how often you seem to think two wrongs make a right.

even ordinary taxpayers, including yourself, pays as little tax as
possible.


Ordinary tax payers get told how much they have to pay and that's that.
Multi national corporations have unimaginable amounts of money to spend on
tax dodgers to work the best scams they can. Not really comparable.

unlike the other companies, however, apple wants to change the the tax
laws so that they're more fair, where they can repatriate the money.
that means they will pay *more* taxes than they currently are, just not
the absurd amounts that the current tax law requires.


If they actually gave two ****s for anything other than the amount of money
they can accumulate they would already be paying taxes at the same rate as
all the other honest companies in the countries in which they extract
exorbitant amounts of money from their customer base.


Tax laws are a judicially approved method implementing economic policy.
think retirement plans, think international trade, etc. It's easy to
criticize with a bumper sticker political slogan It's much harder to
implement in real life. There are many loopholes that perhaps shouldn't
be there, but that doesn't negate the whole system.

--
PeterN
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
***Save money on your taxes**** mailjob1 Digital Photography 0 February 13th 07 02:37 AM
***Save money on your taxes**** mailjob1 Digital Photography 0 February 11th 07 04:20 AM
The New Crime: Wearing Syndrome Survival Kit marika Other Photographic Equipment 0 October 1st 06 06:19 PM
Taxes & Customs [email protected] Digital Photography 5 January 26th 06 12:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.