If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Depth of Field Quest. From Newbie, Please
Hello:
Newbie Photographer. Have a question about depth of field. Have been experimenting a bit, but haven't been able to reach any firm conclusion on this. Let's say I have a subject in the foreground, perhaps six feet or so away, and also some real pretty mountains at infinity that I would also like to be in focus, and clear. I would like the close in subject and also the mountains to both be in focus. For a sunny day, am I better off focusing on the subject, or setting my distance to infinity ? Why ? Does the answer change if it is cloudy out, and i guess my aperture would be much larger ? Thanks, Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert11" wrote in
: Let's say I have a subject in the foreground, perhaps six feet or so away, and also some real pretty mountains at infinity that I would also like to be in focus, and clear. I would like the close in subject and also the mountains to both be in focus. For a sunny day, am I better off focusing on the subject, or setting my distance to infinity ? Why ? Does the answer change if it is cloudy out, and i guess my aperture would be much larger ? There is a setting called hyperfocal distance that you shall use if you want both the background and the foreground to be sharp. This setting is a compromise between infinity and the nearest sharp object. You can find a calculator for the hyper focal distance here http://www.tangentsoft.net/fcalc/ You have to remember to use the actual focal length and the actual sensor size. And - yes - the focal depth is much larger in bright weather, i.e. when you step the camera down. /Roland |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert11" wrote in
: Let's say I have a subject in the foreground, perhaps six feet or so away, and also some real pretty mountains at infinity that I would also like to be in focus, and clear. I would like the close in subject and also the mountains to both be in focus. For a sunny day, am I better off focusing on the subject, or setting my distance to infinity ? Why ? Does the answer change if it is cloudy out, and i guess my aperture would be much larger ? There is a setting called hyperfocal distance that you shall use if you want both the background and the foreground to be sharp. This setting is a compromise between infinity and the nearest sharp object. You can find a calculator for the hyper focal distance here http://www.tangentsoft.net/fcalc/ You have to remember to use the actual focal length and the actual sensor size. And - yes - the focal depth is much larger in bright weather, i.e. when you step the camera down. /Roland |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Roland Karlsson wrote in
: You can find a calculator for the hyper focal distance here http://www.tangentsoft.net/fcalc/ Oops - I downloaded the calculator. Hmmm ... it is not the easiest thing to use. And it does not give the nearest distance that i supposed to be sharp. So .... not all that useful. Here you have the actula formulas http://www.vividlight.com/articles/2314.htm http://tangentsoft.net/fcalc/help/DoF.htm /Roland |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Roland Karlsson wrote in
: You can find a calculator for the hyper focal distance here http://www.tangentsoft.net/fcalc/ Oops - I downloaded the calculator. Hmmm ... it is not the easiest thing to use. And it does not give the nearest distance that i supposed to be sharp. So .... not all that useful. Here you have the actula formulas http://www.vividlight.com/articles/2314.htm http://tangentsoft.net/fcalc/help/DoF.htm /Roland |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Take the DOF preview walk and all will be revealed.
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/mani/techs/mdofwalk.html -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from my novel "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "Robert11" wrote in message ... Hello: Newbie Photographer. Have a question about depth of field. Have been experimenting a bit, but haven't been able to reach any firm conclusion on this. Let's say I have a subject in the foreground, perhaps six feet or so away, and also some real pretty mountains at infinity that I would also like to be in focus, and clear. I would like the close in subject and also the mountains to both be in focus. For a sunny day, am I better off focusing on the subject, or setting my distance to infinity ? Why ? Does the answer change if it is cloudy out, and i guess my aperture would be much larger ? Thanks, Bob |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Take the DOF preview walk and all will be revealed.
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/mani/techs/mdofwalk.html -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from my novel "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "Robert11" wrote in message ... Hello: Newbie Photographer. Have a question about depth of field. Have been experimenting a bit, but haven't been able to reach any firm conclusion on this. Let's say I have a subject in the foreground, perhaps six feet or so away, and also some real pretty mountains at infinity that I would also like to be in focus, and clear. I would like the close in subject and also the mountains to both be in focus. For a sunny day, am I better off focusing on the subject, or setting my distance to infinity ? Why ? Does the answer change if it is cloudy out, and i guess my aperture would be much larger ? Thanks, Bob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:28:28 GMT, "Tony Spadaro"
wrote: Take the DOF preview walk and all will be revealed. http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/mani/techs/mdofwalk.html Amusing. But a little misleading in a digital group. With the toughly 5X greater DOF that most of have over 35 mm film, manually focusing in the aperture priority mode becomes a very useful technique. Got shutter lag problems when the grandkids are dashing about in the back yard. Disable autofocus and you'd be surprised how fast your camera responds. jpc |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:28:28 GMT, "Tony Spadaro"
wrote: Take the DOF preview walk and all will be revealed. http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/mani/techs/mdofwalk.html Amusing. But a little misleading in a digital group. With the toughly 5X greater DOF that most of have over 35 mm film, manually focusing in the aperture priority mode becomes a very useful technique. Got shutter lag problems when the grandkids are dashing about in the back yard. Disable autofocus and you'd be surprised how fast your camera responds. jpc |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie,
Keep it simple..... Depth of field depends only upon the size of the camera's aperature, sunny day, cloudy day, indoors or underwater, no matter. The smaller the aperature, the greater the depth of field. The larger the aperature, the less depth of field. F22 is a small aperature, F4 is a large aperature. This is because light is infinately in focus thru a pinhole. Make your aperature like a pinhole in order to gain maximum depth of field. Demonstrate the above principle to yourself.... poke a pinhole thru a blackened piece of cardboard or piece of black paper and peek thru the hole.....the mountains in the background, the car across the street and the person standing right in front of you will all be in focus. To capture the shot you describe with all in focus, set your aperature as small (f22 or smaller) as good exposure will permit....you will have to use a slow shutter speed to maintain good exposure with such a small aperature. Shoot for the smallest aperature you can, and you will be happy with the depth of field. Hope this helps! Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
roll-film back: DOF question | RSD99 | Large Format Photography Equipment | 41 | July 30th 04 03:12 AM |
Depth of Field Preview Question: | Michael P Gabriel | Digital Photography | 6 | June 25th 04 11:29 PM |
Depth of Field is Enough to Negate Parallel Issues?????? | Dr. Slick | Large Format Photography Equipment | 10 | March 1st 04 08:40 PM |
RB67 Depth of Field with Extension Tube | TWW | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 1 | February 29th 04 03:21 PM |
Depth of field and Diffraction | John Hendry | Large Format Photography Equipment | 11 | January 21st 04 08:31 PM |