If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Alan Browne wrote:
ps56k wrote: from a friend - - ---- I have invested a lot of time and effort in creating a folder of all my photos over the years, currently ~16,000 occupying 10.7Gb on my hard disk. Having learned the lesson the hard way, I have backed them up on DVD's. Since each DVD will only hold 4.7Gb, I have to split up the folder to do this. I know there are flash drives available that will go to 32Gb, and I think now even 64Gb. My question: Is it "okay" to use a flash drive as an archival storage device? Is it as stable as DVD's? As secure? What if I store it in a "cool, dry place"? What are your thoughts? Another option, just remembered, is "write once" cards. Similar to a Flash card form factor (say CF or SD), but you can only write to them once. These were announced a year or so ago, but I haven't seen any so far in the marketplace. The issue here may be readability in 20 or 40 years. The data will survive, but will there be readers? (Note: I believe the most 'readable' format in 20 and even 40 years will still be 5.25" DVD's). Or will Blu-Ray kill them off? And if that happens, something will supplant Blu-Ray. Not one single data format or device is obsolete-proof. Allen |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Allen wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: ps56k wrote: from a friend - - ---- I have invested a lot of time and effort in creating a folder of all my photos over the years, currently ~16,000 occupying 10.7Gb on my hard disk. Having learned the lesson the hard way, I have backed them up on DVD's. Since each DVD will only hold 4.7Gb, I have to split up the folder to do this. I know there are flash drives available that will go to 32Gb, and I think now even 64Gb. My question: Is it "okay" to use a flash drive as an archival storage device? Is it as stable as DVD's? As secure? What if I store it in a "cool, dry place"? What are your thoughts? Another option, just remembered, is "write once" cards. Similar to a Flash card form factor (say CF or SD), but you can only write to them once. These were announced a year or so ago, but I haven't seen any so far in the marketplace. The issue here may be readability in 20 or 40 years. The data will survive, but will there be readers? (Note: I believe the most 'readable' format in 20 and even 40 years will still be 5.25" DVD's). Or will Blu-Ray kill them off? And if that happens, something will supplant Blu-Ray. Not one single data format or device is obsolete-proof. Sorry, by "DVD" I really meant the 5.25" optical disk size of any format. A BluRay drive will read DVD and CD. Whatever is 'next' will read them all too... nice thing about finer and finer data, the laser can always read the coarser data... -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Alan wrote on Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:16:15 -0400:
Allen wrote: Alan Browne wrote: ps56k wrote: from a friend - - ---- I have invested a lot of time and effort in creating a folder of all my photos over the years, currently ~16,000 occupying 10.7Gb on my hard disk. Having learned the lesson the hard way, I have backed them up on DVD's. Since each DVD will only hold 4.7Gb, I have to split up the folder to do this. I know there are flash drives available that will go to 32Gb, and I think now even 64Gb. My question: Is it "okay" to use a flash drive as an archival storage device? Is it as stable as DVD's? As secure? What if I store it in a "cool, dry place"? What are your thoughts? Another option, just remembered, is "write once" cards. Similar to a Flash card form factor (say CF or SD), but you can only write to them once. These were announced a year or so ago, but I haven't seen any so far in the marketplace. The issue here may be readability in 20 or 40 years. The data will survive, but will there be readers? (Note: I believe the most 'readable' format in 20 and even 40 years will still be 5.25" DVD's). Or will Blu-Ray kill them off? And if that happens, something will supplant Blu-Ray. Not one single data format or device is obsolete-proof. Sorry, by "DVD" I really meant the 5.25" optical disk size of any format. A BluRay drive will read DVD and CD. Whatever is 'next' will read them all too... nice thing about finer and finer data, the laser can always read the coarser data... Truly archival storage will probably require periodic copying to new media to avoid both obsolescence and chemical damage. Deposition of metal, as in old fashioned prints and negatives, might ultimately be the best but that depends on the substrate. The cellulose acetate film of several 1930s movies has irreversibly deteriorated. However, good color prints have been made from the separation negatives made by Prokudin-Gorsky (spelling?) in the early 1900s -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
James Silverton wrote:
Truly archival storage will probably require periodic copying to new media to avoid both obsolescence and chemical damage. Deposition of You missed, in a different splinter of the thread, where I suggest gold type DVD's for archival storage. 100+ years in benign conditions. I would expect that, in time, there will be gold BR discs as well. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Alan wrote on Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:15:16 -0400:
Truly archival storage will probably require periodic copying to new media to avoid both obsolescence and chemical damage. Deposition of You missed, in a different splinter of the thread, where I suggest gold type DVD's for archival storage. 100+ years in benign conditions. I would expect that, in time, there will be gold BR discs as well. Possibly but 100 years has not passed despite attempts at simulation and readers for the discs may not exist in as little as 20 years time. -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Alan Browne wrote:
Allen wrote: Alan Browne wrote: ps56k wrote: from a friend - - ---- I have invested a lot of time and effort in creating a folder of all my photos over the years, currently ~16,000 occupying 10.7Gb on my hard disk. Having learned the lesson the hard way, I have backed them up on DVD's. Since each DVD will only hold 4.7Gb, I have to split up the folder to do this. I know there are flash drives available that will go to 32Gb, and I think now even 64Gb. My question: Is it "okay" to use a flash drive as an archival storage device? Is it as stable as DVD's? As secure? What if I store it in a "cool, dry place"? What are your thoughts? Another option, just remembered, is "write once" cards. Similar to a Flash card form factor (say CF or SD), but you can only write to them once. These were announced a year or so ago, but I haven't seen any so far in the marketplace. The issue here may be readability in 20 or 40 years. The data will survive, but will there be readers? (Note: I believe the most 'readable' format in 20 and even 40 years will still be 5.25" DVD's). Or will Blu-Ray kill them off? And if that happens, something will supplant Blu-Ray. Not one single data format or device is obsolete-proof. Sorry, by "DVD" I really meant the 5.25" optical disk size of any format. A BluRay drive will read DVD and CD. Whatever is 'next' will read them all too... nice thing about finer and finer data, the laser can always read the coarser data... That only works with stamped optical media. With writable dye-based discs the color of the light is important and a new device may not be able to read older media. -- Ray Fischer |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Alan Browne wrote:
James Silverton wrote: Truly archival storage will probably require periodic copying to new media to avoid both obsolescence and chemical damage. Deposition of You missed, in a different splinter of the thread, where I suggest gold type DVD's for archival storage. 100+ years in benign conditions. Do you own stock in the company? Or is there some other reason that you keep pushing that as the solution to all backup problems? -- Ray Fischer |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Ray Fischer wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: A BluRay drive will read DVD and CD. Whatever is 'next' will read them all too... nice thing about finer and finer data, the laser can always read the coarser data... That only works with stamped optical media. Cite reference. With writable dye-based discs the color of the light is important and a new device may not be able to read older media. That's plausible, time will tell. But nonetheless BR readers will be around for at least the next 20 years. More like 40 - 50. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Ray Fischer wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: James Silverton wrote: Truly archival storage will probably require periodic copying to new media to avoid both obsolescence and chemical damage. Deposition of You missed, in a different splinter of the thread, where I suggest gold type DVD's for archival storage. 100+ years in benign conditions. Do you own stock in the company? Or is there some other reason that you keep pushing that as the solution to all backup problems? No and False. I suggested external hard drives and moving the backup forward on to new drives as they come out at significantly higher capacity. But, where people are determined to use DVD I suggest that they at least use the 'gold' archival types that will last many times longer. Shouldn't you be researching AA filter affects on image resolution? -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
archiving of digital photos
Alan wrote on Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:50:45 -0400:
Ray Fischer wrote: Alan Browne wrote: A BluRay drive will read DVD and CD. Whatever is 'next' will read them all too... nice thing about finer and finer data, the laser can always read the coarser data... That only works with stamped optical media. Cite reference. With writable dye-based discs the color of the light is important and a new device may not be able to read older media. That's plausible, time will tell. But nonetheless BR readers will be around for at least the next 20 years. More like 40 - 50. Nostradamus or Cassandra? -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Archiving Old Photos - A Newbie Question | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 4 | June 10th 06 09:19 PM |
Archiving Old Photos - A Newbie Question | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | June 10th 06 03:50 AM |
Do you use CD or DVD for archiving? | Laser Faire | Digital Photography | 15 | February 25th 05 04:44 PM |
negative archiving | Conrad Weiler | Digital Photography | 4 | December 30th 04 10:07 PM |
Archiving digital pictures. Experiences? | Jacob K. | Digital Photography | 5 | November 26th 04 06:20 AM |