A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

If there's no shake, I can't be responsible



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 17th 10, 12:32 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
Dudley Hanks[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,282
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...

Take Care,
Dudley


  #2  
Old June 17th 10, 12:58 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
LOL!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 469
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible

On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens. Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so. You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!

  #3  
Old June 17th 10, 01:06 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
Dudley Hanks[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,282
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible


"LOL!" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens. Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything
illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is
off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so. You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!


LOL, why don't you try blind-folding yourself and doing that one second
exposure, and post the result?

You'll find that it's a bit tricky with no visual cues to orient yourself...

Besides, I'm a blind photographer, my pics should look the part, should they
not?

This is what you'll never understand. I'm not after traditional pics; I'm
after pics that depict the world as a blind photographer interacts with it.
What else could it be?

You don't even know how to interact properly with the sighted world as a
sighted person, so I guess I should not be surprised...

Take Care,
Dudley


  #4  
Old June 17th 10, 01:13 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
LOL!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 469
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:06:15 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens. Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything
illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is
off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so. You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!


LOL, why don't you try blind-folding yourself and doing that one second
exposure, and post the result?

You'll find that it's a bit tricky with no visual cues to orient yourself...

Besides, I'm a blind photographer, my pics should look the part, should they
not?



That's easy. Just super-glue a lens-cap over your lens. All problem solved,
for everyone.

LOL!

  #5  
Old June 17th 10, 01:26 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
Dudley Hanks[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,282
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible


"LOL!" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:06:15 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot
a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens.
Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS
works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything
illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is
off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that
you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so.
You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!


LOL, why don't you try blind-folding yourself and doing that one second
exposure, and post the result?

You'll find that it's a bit tricky with no visual cues to orient
yourself...

Besides, I'm a blind photographer, my pics should look the part, should
they
not?



That's easy. Just super-glue a lens-cap over your lens. All problem
solved,
for everyone.

LOL!


You're the only one with a problem, and it's really none of your business
what I do...

I've come across some incredible bigots in my life, but, LOL, you really
take the cake ...

I'm curious, why does somebody like yourself, somebody who can't appreciate
beauty in anybody else (and that's based on your general responses to all
the other members of the group and not just those to myself) choose to
critique a subject as subjective as photography?

Is it because you can't be proven wrong when all your doing is expressing an
opinion? as opposed to facts?

I must admit, I'd love to have coffee with you some day, just to hear if
there's a sneer or a snicker as you let loose your vitriol...

Take Care,
Dudley



  #6  
Old June 17th 10, 01:41 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
LOL!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 469
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:26:22 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:06:15 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot
a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens.
Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS
works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything
illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is
off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that
you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so.
You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!


LOL, why don't you try blind-folding yourself and doing that one second
exposure, and post the result?

You'll find that it's a bit tricky with no visual cues to orient
yourself...

Besides, I'm a blind photographer, my pics should look the part, should
they
not?



That's easy. Just super-glue a lens-cap over your lens. All problem
solved,
for everyone.

LOL!


You're the only one with a problem, and it's really none of your business
what I do...


Then why did you ask for my opinion specifically? You lying and
manipulative self-victimizing cretin.


I've come across some incredible bigots in my life, but, LOL, you really
take the cake ...

I'm curious, why does somebody like yourself, somebody who can't appreciate
beauty in anybody else (and that's based on your general responses to all
the other members of the group and not just those to myself) choose to
critique a subject as subjective as photography?


Someone who professes to be as talented as Da Vinci yet can't take a
snapshot any better than a 2 year-old randomly clicking a shutter in the
general direction of something by using a fully automated camera doesn't
deserve respect. You disrespect the world by spamming and scamming everyone
with your poor-pitiful-me carnival side-show act.
  #7  
Old June 18th 10, 06:23 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
Neil Harrington[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 380
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible


"Dudley Hanks" wrote in message
news:XFdSn.6891$Z6.5070@edtnps82...

"LOL!" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot
a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens. Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything
illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is
off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that
you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so.
You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!


LOL, why don't you try blind-folding yourself and doing that one second
exposure, and post the result?

You'll find that it's a bit tricky with no visual cues to orient
yourself...

Besides, I'm a blind photographer, my pics should look the part, should
they not?

This is what you'll never understand. I'm not after traditional pics;
I'm after pics that depict the world as a blind photographer interacts
with it. What else could it be?

You don't even know how to interact properly with the sighted world as a
sighted person, so I guess I should not be surprised...

Take Care,
Dudley


Just curious, Dudley -- how blind are you? How do you view the images you
capture, and how do you read the posts in this newsgroup?

Also, I don't know why you bother replying to "LOL" -- he's just a pest and
a complete waste of time.


  #8  
Old June 18th 10, 08:13 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
Dudley Hanks[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,282
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible


"Neil Harrington" wrote in message
...

"Dudley Hanks" wrote in message
news:XFdSn.6891$Z6.5070@edtnps82...

"LOL!" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot
a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens.
Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS
works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything
illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is
off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that
you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so.
You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!


LOL, why don't you try blind-folding yourself and doing that one second
exposure, and post the result?

You'll find that it's a bit tricky with no visual cues to orient
yourself...

Besides, I'm a blind photographer, my pics should look the part, should
they not?

This is what you'll never understand. I'm not after traditional pics;
I'm after pics that depict the world as a blind photographer interacts
with it. What else could it be?

You don't even know how to interact properly with the sighted world as a
sighted person, so I guess I should not be surprised...

Take Care,
Dudley


Just curious, Dudley -- how blind are you? How do you view the images you
capture, and how do you read the posts in this newsgroup?

Also, I don't know why you bother replying to "LOL" -- he's just a pest
and a complete waste of time.


Regarding my sight:

I see only gross light perception, which means I can tell if there is light,
but I can't make out any detail other than gross shapes.

For instance, If there is a large plant in front of a window, I would see a
bright area where the window is, but I probably wouldn't see the plant in
front -- except maybe if it were a very large and bulky one. On the other
hand, If a person is standing in front of the window, I would see a dark
rather ill-defined silhouette, as the person would block enough light to
negate part of the window

As for what I see in my pictures, usually not much.

In the pic I posted a while back of the $1 coin on a keyboard, I just saw a
bright circle carved out of the remaining darkness. I couldn't see anything
in the last flower pics I posted, or the shot of Mich sitting pretty. And,
I saw a dark blog where the fig newton was in that shot of the treat sitting
on a plate.

There are some exquisite moments, where the light is just right, when I can
see enough to actually compose the shapes I see in the viewfinder / display,
but those seem to get fewer and farther between all the time.

Regarding why I bother with LOL, you might say it's "force of habit."

I've come across people like him in real life, and I haven't backed down.
Why would I back down to some one not even brave enough to step out of the
shadow of anonymity?

If other disabled people read these posts, I want them to get the message
that blindness is just one more feature of their day they need to cope with.
It isn't anything they need be ashamed of, nothing that others can use
against them, not a freakish deformity that should cause them to shrink into
the murky background, definitely not a force strong enough to keep them from
achieving their goals -- regardless of what their goals might be.

I regard giving the silent treatment to LOL / Jeff / Jerry / etc much like
trying to appease Hitler; it just doesn't work, at least not so far as
LOL's comments about how blindness should limit my options.

You'll notice I usually don't say too much when he's just spouting off about
cams and other equipment. In that area he's harmless. But, when it comes
to his bigoted, narcissistic, self-aggrandisement of himself through the
debasement of another's physical, emotional or mental limitation simply
because he's intent on destroying another's soul in order for him to feel a
warm fuzzy glow where his heart should be, I say my piece.

It may not help him, or further my pursuit of progress, but I hope it serves
as an example to other blind people to step up and try to hit their home
run, in whatever art / sport / business venture they have chosen...

Take Care,
Dudley


  #9  
Old June 18th 10, 08:54 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
LOL!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 469
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:13:02 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:


"Neil Harrington" wrote in message
m...

"Dudley Hanks" wrote in message
news:XFdSn.6891$Z6.5070@edtnps82...

"LOL!" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:32:57 GMT, "Dudley Hanks"
wrote:

for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


Why? I tested my own handheld skills on IS equipped cameras. I can shoot
a
tack-sharp image at a full 1-second long exposure with a 432mm lens.
Just
to see where my and its limits lie. But it requires knowing how IS
works,
its limitations, using the proper IS setting, and having exceptional
handheld skills to begin with.

In your image you're not so skilled, nor even lucky. Everything
illuminated
by available light is blurred. Only those features stopped by the higher
speed of the fill-flash burst are clearer. Not to mention the focus is
off,
the camera focused on the oven behind the randomly placed, badly tilted,
and aroused dog. Is your spatial acuity and motor-control so poor that
you
can't even tell when you are holding a camera level? Apparently so.
You're
not going to make a very good blind person. You'll even suck at that.

LOL!


LOL, why don't you try blind-folding yourself and doing that one second
exposure, and post the result?

You'll find that it's a bit tricky with no visual cues to orient
yourself...

Besides, I'm a blind photographer, my pics should look the part, should
they not?

This is what you'll never understand. I'm not after traditional pics;
I'm after pics that depict the world as a blind photographer interacts
with it. What else could it be?

You don't even know how to interact properly with the sighted world as a
sighted person, so I guess I should not be surprised...

Take Care,
Dudley


Just curious, Dudley -- how blind are you? How do you view the images you
capture, and how do you read the posts in this newsgroup?

Also, I don't know why you bother replying to "LOL" -- he's just a pest
and a complete waste of time.


Regarding my sight:

I see only gross light perception, which means I can tell if there is light,
but I can't make out any detail other than gross shapes.

For instance, If there is a large plant in front of a window, I would see a
bright area where the window is, but I probably wouldn't see the plant in
front -- except maybe if it were a very large and bulky one. On the other
hand, If a person is standing in front of the window, I would see a dark
rather ill-defined silhouette, as the person would block enough light to
negate part of the window

As for what I see in my pictures, usually not much.

In the pic I posted a while back of the $1 coin on a keyboard, I just saw a
bright circle carved out of the remaining darkness. I couldn't see anything
in the last flower pics I posted, or the shot of Mich sitting pretty. And,
I saw a dark blog where the fig newton was in that shot of the treat sitting
on a plate.

There are some exquisite moments, where the light is just right, when I can
see enough to actually compose the shapes I see in the viewfinder / display,
but those seem to get fewer and farther between all the time.

Regarding why I bother with LOL, you might say it's "force of habit."

I've come across people like him in real life, and I haven't backed down.
Why would I back down to some one not even brave enough to step out of the
shadow of anonymity?

If other disabled people read these posts, I want them to get the message
that blindness is just one more feature of their day they need to cope with.
It isn't anything they need be ashamed of, nothing that others can use
against them, not a freakish deformity that should cause them to shrink into
the murky background, definitely not a force strong enough to keep them from
achieving their goals -- regardless of what their goals might be.

I regard giving the silent treatment to LOL / Jeff / Jerry / etc much like
trying to appease Hitler; it just doesn't work, at least not so far as
LOL's comments about how blindness should limit my options.

You'll notice I usually don't say too much when he's just spouting off about
cams and other equipment. In that area he's harmless. But, when it comes
to his bigoted, narcissistic, self-aggrandisement of himself through the
debasement of another's physical, emotional or mental limitation simply
because he's intent on destroying another's soul in order for him to feel a
warm fuzzy glow where his heart should be, I say my piece.

It may not help him, or further my pursuit of progress, but I hope it serves
as an example to other blind people to step up and try to hit their home
run, in whatever art / sport / business venture they have chosen...

Take Care,
Dudley


Let's all watch the paraplegic psychotic believing he's going to be a
famous ballet-dancer one day while he's flopping around on the floor. While
fools just as twisted by their misplaced pity urge him on for their own
sick form of entertainment. There is absolutely NO difference between those
two situations. In scenarios like that, just as yours, they are all
pitiable and disgusting humans.

This has NOTHING to do with bigotry you ****ingly demented, psychotic, and
pathetic ass--all the while playing your glaringly transparent
self-victimizing routine to manipulate others. It has to do with REALITY.
Ever hear of it?

Did you get another donation to buy a Leica while you stick the money in
some other bank account because the Leica will do you absolutely no good?
Even a Barbie-Cam would be no different than the results that you would get
with a Leica. You know it, everyone that knows you knows it. But someone
online that you would be able to scam would be too stupid to know it. How
about it, scam-artist? Because that's all and exactly what you really are.
An online scammer and scam artist, nothing more, nothing less. You're most
definitely not any kind of photographer. Your photographs wouldn't even
beat those of a 2 year-old snapshooter with his very first Fisher-Price
"Toddler's 1st Camera".


BTW: how the hell would something like you know if I am giving worthwhile
advice about cameras and photography, when you can't even see anything in
photographs, and your own skills stink to high heaven. Your comments about
others' advice is just as obviously empty as your photography skills.

LOL!



  #10  
Old June 17th 10, 01:31 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.point+shoot,rec.photo.digital
whisky-dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 559
Default If there's no shake, I can't be responsible


"Dudley Hanks" wrote in message
news:JadSn.6890$Z6.4431@edtnps82...
for LOL's actions ...

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...tingPretty.jpg (Full Size)

http://www.blind-apertures.ca/Latest...rettySmall.jpg (Fast
Loading)

Handheld @ 1/3 sec...

If it's clean, LOL's gonna flip his lid ...


I think he has an ear missing, mich that is rather than LOL who seems to be
missing a brain. ;-)




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WOW - A wreck! (Not responsible if it works for you!) Lorem Ipsum Large Format Equipment For Sale 0 October 1st 05 11:22 PM
Camera Shake rda Digital Photography 29 October 10th 04 02:22 AM
Camera shake and lp/mm RolandRB Medium Format Photography Equipment 97 August 25th 04 09:23 PM
Responsible For All World Problems William Graham 35mm Photo Equipment 1 July 26th 04 09:59 PM
FORGERY: Responsible For All World Problems Susan Cohen Digital Photography 0 July 26th 04 06:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.