BAN: Photography on USA trains and buses

In article ,
"Gary P" askme@newsgroup wrote:

Since when is a double negative an example of adequate logical argument?
It's not even terrific English. Nor are you developing a logical argument
from a proven premise as "logic" would require.

Then again one might be intelligent enough to infer; that the premise
was stated as tongue in cheek, or in the case of my premise to get Rata
to think before posting drivel that "Fly" would take issue with
in his rather militant manner, that he so rabidly defends :-)

Since Rata said that the US is a police state, the logic of Moose's post
dictates that he is a terrorist sympathizer. That is of course predicated
on the correctness of Moose's logic.

In this instance, a big predicate.

You can not factually state that terrorist sympathizers
would not classify the US as a police state, because you don't knew every thought process
they have.The US could be considered a police state especially if those terrorists
were denied access to traveling to here. I would think they would have
major issues if suddenly the free access they previously enjoyed was cut off.
They might even post to the newsgroups such as this one using various aliases,
such as Gary "C" or Red Rat,....to test the waters and
to gain information. Just a theory, and all in fun.

Take Care.
--
Duzz that A moose you ?