If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1141
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Martindale" wrote in message ... SNIP Anyone who thinks that data from a linear CCD scanner that scans the full width of the frame simultaneously is in any way applicable to a drum scanner that illuminates and measures only one point on the film at once is seriously out to lunch. Indeed, and even the (adjustable) size/shape of the scan spot will change the MTF. Bart |
#1142
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Martindale" wrote in message ... SNIP Anyone who thinks that data from a linear CCD scanner that scans the full width of the frame simultaneously is in any way applicable to a drum scanner that illuminates and measures only one point on the film at once is seriously out to lunch. Indeed, and even the (adjustable) size/shape of the scan spot will change the MTF. Bart |
#1143
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Martindale" wrote in message ... SNIP Anyone who thinks that data from a linear CCD scanner that scans the full width of the frame simultaneously is in any way applicable to a drum scanner that illuminates and measures only one point on the film at once is seriously out to lunch. Indeed, and even the (adjustable) size/shape of the scan spot will change the MTF. Bart |
#1145
|
|||
|
|||
Jon Pike writes:
wrote in : Jon Pike writes: wrote in : You're entirely missing the point. What all the digital supporters seem to be saying is that, although they have no real basis for it, they -think- that all the important information is being captured. And what you're saying is that, although you have no real basis for it, you -think- that important information is being lost. No, I've seen results of tests No, no, no, Jon! No fair using the plural here! Yes, perfectly fair. He tested several things, so there were several tests done. What "several things"? The same piece of film, scanned and seen through a microscope. Came up with two numbers that seem to you to be the most important facts. No, the *only* important facts. snip -- -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I need to transfer my digital files to 35mm slides and negatives output and other film format outputs? | Chris | Digital Photography | 5 | September 25th 04 07:43 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 274 | July 30th 04 12:26 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | Digital Photography | 213 | July 28th 04 06:30 PM |
Will digital photography ever stabilize? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 37 | June 30th 04 08:11 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |