Oh my! Where oh where did all the lying slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLS go to?

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"LOL!" wrote in message
...



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:28:30 -0400, "Tim Conway"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
.. .



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own? If so, please describe any one of
them that you said I had stolen. I would love nothing better than to hear
all about it again. I'll repost the downsized "stolen" version for you
again just to make sure that it is one of the many that any of you lying
slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLs claimed I had stole.

LOL!!!!

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:21:30 -0500, LOL! wrote:


Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own?

I don't remember any links to any images that I would want to claim to
be a DSLR-taken image. Mud is mud, whether taken with a DSLR or a
P&S.

If you are an image thief, you've got to be the dumbest one I've ever
come across. Nothing you've linked to and claimed as your own work
was worth stealing. Or posting. Or keeping.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:52:28 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:21:30 -0500, LOL! wrote:


Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own?

I don't remember any links to any images that I would want to claim to
be a DSLR-taken image. Mud is mud, whether taken with a DSLR or a
P&S.

If you are an image thief, you've got to be the dumbest one I've ever
come across. Nothing you've linked to and claimed as your own work
was worth stealing. Or posting. Or keeping.

Oh good, you just outted yourself as a ****ing liar. Either you've never
seen any of them or you're a liar about the ones you have seen. A liar, in
either direction that you want to turn on this one.

Paint yourself into corners much?

Everyone keeps claiming I stole them because they insist they were all
taken with DSLRs. Why? Because: 1) either they're so good, or 2) because
they believe that no compact or superzoom camera could EVER capture an
image in the situations they've been taken; wrongly assuming everything
they've ever known or read about DSLRs, compacts, and superzoom cameras.

You ... ARE A LIAR!

Signed, sealed, posted, and proved.

LOL!!!!

"LOL!" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:28:30 -0400, "Tim Conway"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
. ..



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own? If so, please describe any one of
them that you said I had stolen. I would love nothing better than to hear
all about it again. I'll repost the downsized "stolen" version for you
again just to make sure that it is one of the many that any of you lying
slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLs claimed I had stole.

LOL!!!!


OMG you are actually going to post a photo, I dare you, go on...........

On 2010-09-11 15:21:30 -0700, LOL! said:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:28:30 -0400, "Tim Conway"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
...



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own? If so, please describe any one of
them that you said I had stolen. I would love nothing better than to hear
all about it again. I'll repost the downsized "stolen" version for you
again just to make sure that it is one of the many that any of you lying
slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLs claimed I had stole.

LOL!!!!

How about the hummingbird photos you claimed were your own -- but they
still had the real photographer's copyright notice on the photo?

--
Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:42:47 +1000, "Pete D" wrote:



"LOL!" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:28:30 -0400, "Tim Conway"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
...



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own? If so, please describe any one of
them that you said I had stolen. I would love nothing better than to hear
all about it again. I'll repost the downsized "stolen" version for you
again just to make sure that it is one of the many that any of you lying
slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLs claimed I had stole.

LOL!!!!


OMG you are actually going to post a photo, I dare you, go on...........

GLADLY! Just describe any one of them that you or others claimed I posted
and stole in the past. It's THAT simple!

C'mon, you ****ingly useless pretend-photographer trolls. You're all talk
whenever I post a photo, claiming I stole them, why so quiet now? Because
you got caught in your ****ing slanderous and libelous lies?

LOL!!!!!!!

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:53:37 -0700, C J Campbell
wrote:

On 2010-09-11 15:21:30 -0700, LOL! said:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:28:30 -0400, "Tim Conway"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
...



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own? If so, please describe any one of
them that you said I had stolen. I would love nothing better than to hear
all about it again. I'll repost the downsized "stolen" version for you
again just to make sure that it is one of the many that any of you lying
slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLs claimed I had stole.

LOL!!!!

How about the hummingbird photos you claimed were your own -- but they
still had the real photographer's copyright notice on the photo?

Oh LOOK! Another ****INGLY USELESS LIAR AND TROLL!!

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

I love it! Even in a thread that proves their lies and slander they
continue to lie and slander. And I can PROVE IT!

LOL!!!!!!!!


If you recall, in message ID:

On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:05:27 -0500, Superzooms Still Win wrote:

On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:51:07 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2010-09-06 17:30:03 -0700, "Peter" said:

"Superzooms Still Win" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:53:04 -0500, Superzooms Still Win
wrote:


Flash ruins any nature-photography subject. It also imparts unnatural
colors due to its intensity and UV light output, causing many structures
like feathers of birds and exoskeletons of insects to fluoresce in
unnatural hues.

Here's a good example of what high-powered flash does to the colors in
birds' feathers.

Broad-tailed Hummingbird (female, both images)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1307/1027755241_f0b4caf468.jpg

Compare to the same species taken using available light alone.

http://www.hocus-phocus.com/Images/CRW_6518BroadtailedHb1.jpg

You'd never find the artificially and garishly colored one taken with flash
in any birder's ID guide. People who put photos like that on their walls
also have a collection of black-velvet fluorescent Elvis paintings lit by
black-lights. The have no concept of reality left.



Gee, was that really taken by you. It actually is a nice shot.

Of course it isn't his.
It was processed with PS, and he has told us he wouldn't touch PS.
...and then there is the © notification to consider. So he is just
using others' work as usual.
His stuff is usually postage stamp size, and degraded to the point of
being useless.

Now, why would you want them to be useful to you? So you can steal them and
use them for your own gain like so many images of mine have been stolen and
used in the past?

The above two are not mine but were good examples to show how flash
destroys all nature photography, especially bird photography, nothing more.
A very simple way to tell--those two will still be on the net at those same
links 24-36 hours from now. Mine will not. Just as every photo of my own
that I posted is no longer available on any past discussion threads.

Still can't get enough attention, eh? You ****ingly useless off-topic
thread-hijacking crapshooting TROLL.

LOL!


EAT ****! You lying **** of a slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLL!

LOL!!!!

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:03:29 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:53:37 -0700, C J Campbell
wrote:

On 2010-09-11 15:21:30 -0700, LOL! said:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:28:30 -0400, "Tim Conway"
wrote:


"LOL!" wrote in message
...



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's in a slump. Got nothin' bad to say and is feelin' real perplexed.
btw, a real photograph isn't necessarily a museum showpiece. Sometimes a
mere record photo will do. But y'know, a famous world renowned traveler
like our favorite p&s troll would never stand for such a meager critique.
Have a good one!

Oh? Were you one of the many that claimed I stole images that were taken
with DSLRs and posted them as my own? If so, please describe any one of
them that you said I had stolen. I would love nothing better than to hear
all about it again. I'll repost the downsized "stolen" version for you
again just to make sure that it is one of the many that any of you lying
slanderous and libelous DSLR-TROLLs claimed I had stole.

LOL!!!!

How about the hummingbird photos you claimed were your own -- but they
still had the real photographer's copyright notice on the photo?

I think he posted a link to a photgraph of a moth. I think it was a
moth. It was a dark, blurry thing that may have had wings. He said
it was a rare moth. He photographs a lot of rare things that are not
in any of the guide books. Of course, it may be that the guide books
just don't use dark, out-of-focus, blurry shots.

OH LOOK! The ****ingly useless lying libelous and slanderous DSLR-TROLL
proves that's JUST what he is, again!

Are you refering to THIS post?

Message ID:

On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:47:47 -0500, Superzooms Still Win wrote:

On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 21:10:18 -0400, "Neil Harrington"
wrote:


"Peter" wrote in message
...
"Superzooms Still Win" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:53:04 -0500, Superzooms Still Win
wrote:


Flash ruins any nature-photography subject. It also imparts unnatural
colors due to its intensity and UV light output, causing many structures
like feathers of birds and exoskeletons of insects to fluoresce in
unnatural hues.

Here's a good example of what high-powered flash does to the colors in
birds' feathers.

Broad-tailed Hummingbird (female, both images)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1307/1027755241_f0b4caf468.jpg

Compare to the same species taken using available light alone.

http://www.hocus-phocus.com/Images/CRW_6518BroadtailedHb1.jpg

You'd never find the artificially and garishly colored one taken with
flash
in any birder's ID guide. People who put photos like that on their walls
also have a collection of black-velvet fluorescent Elvis paintings lit by
black-lights. The have no concept of reality left.



Gee, was that really taken by you.

No, it wasn't taken by the troll. He does this frequently, swipes the work
of photographers who know what they're doing and passes it off here as his
own. He has various phony excuses for why he never presents the images in a
larger size; the actual reason is that he just takes them off the Internet
at the sizes he finds them in.

Correction:

You're ALL nothing but ****ing slanderous liar TROLLS. Nothing more.


Here's 100% proof that that's all that you are and will ever be.

Downsize just posted:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4133/4964883939_71fc42a8c5_z.jpg

100% pixel crop:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4152/4966255846_107ce516f3_t.jpga


Downsize just posted:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4088/4964883943_6c45c771a9.jpg

100% pixel crop:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4109/4966255870_376bc6e6ff_t.jpg

Where oh where did I get those 100% pixel crops if I stole the images?

Enjoy eating your decaying fetid crow.

What a ****ing waste of my time. Having to show the whole world what
pathetic liars you are. I'm sure others must be aware enough to have
figured that out on their own from your past behaviors, but just in case --
the above is 100% proof that you all are just that, lousy slanderous liar
trolls, and only that. Absolutely nothing more than that. Nor will you ever
be more than that in your sorry excuses for lives.

Of course, if you had seen the image of the rare white Tiger Swallowtail
butterfly that I posted in the past and then the 100% pixel crop showing
resolution detail down to individual wing scales, shot from 7 feet away,
that too would prove you all to be the pathetic liar trolls that you are.
Why you even bother trying to continue to prove that's all you are is
beyond me. What a legacy you leave of yourselves on the net, and to the
world.

LOL!!!!!!!!