IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR JEFF RALPH AND ANY OTHER IMAGE THIEVES WITHMY PROPERTY

On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:37:24 -0700 (PDT), Annika1980
wrote:
: On Aug 5, 3:49*pm, The pixel Bandit wrote:
:
: *Last warning:*
: Get rid of that part of your website that contains copyright
: material belonging to me that you are using in a derogatory
: manner intended to damage my reputation ...*before midnight on
: 9th August 2009*
:
: Uh-oh, I can hear the crack Arkansas legal team firing up!
:
: Jeff (I thought it was "Raph") could always move his site to GoDaddy.
: We both know that GoDaddy doesn't enforce their Terms of Service.
:
: One Q. Given what you've posted here and all the vitriol and lies
: you've been spewing for years, how could anyone possibly damage your
: reputation?

Few would appreciate being considered a clown. But even fewer would care to be
demoted from a clown to a laughingstock.

Bob

On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:09:27 +1000, "Jeff R." wrote:
: Atheist Chaplain wrote:
: "The pixel Bandit" wrote in message
: ...
: Jeff R. wrote:
:
: Oh boy...
: You finally got your wish... Fool.
:
:
: --
:
: WOW this should have Douggie hunkered over Google for ages so he can
: pretend to be a legal eagle and bluff your host into submission, I DO
: DO DO DO so want Douggie to try this because filing a false or
: misleading DMCA complaint is punishable by fines in excess of $50,000
: US and/or Gaol time LOL Should be fun to watch events unfold.
:
: ...and unfold they will.
:
: Here is a copy of an email received this morning:
:
: http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug-02.html
:
: I have already (in a previous post in this thread) outlined the many errors
: in Doug's charge(s), so I don't think its necessary to restate the obvious.
:
: I will, however, restate my sincere offer to remove all of the so-called
: "offending material" if Doug will simply prove my assertions wrong, by
: posting a copy of the alleged "stepped-out pano."
:
: There is certainly no obligation under law for me to remove my page - but
: I will do so if Doug can prove me wrong on the original issue.
:
: Blustering threats don't impress me.

I think they should agree to hold the trial in Tibet. Either or both of them
could well benefit from having a jury that doesn't understand English.

Bob

On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:42:24 -0400, "Bowser" wrote:
:
: "Annika1980" wrote in message
: ...
: On Aug 6, 6:09 pm, "Jeff R." wrote:
:
: ...and unfold they will.
:
: Here is a copy of an email received this morning:
:
: http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug-02.html
:
:
: As American football great, Terrell Owens, would say, "Better get your
: popcorn ready, cause it's gonna be a show!"
:
: Yeah, he said that before a game against the Patriots. Which TO's team lost.
: It was a shot, but not the way he wanted. Too bad he can't play the game
: with his lips.
:
: Douggie, I'm hurt that you didn't sue me first. Perhaps you're
: waiting for our Sheriff to get out of prison before you serve the
: papers?

Hey, Bowser, have you been to see the Edward Steichen exhibit in Williamstown?
My wife and I are heading up there tomorrow (on possibly the only really nice
weekend of the summer in our part of the world).

The Austrialians in this thread wou't have the slightest idea what I'm talking
about, but that just makes it even. I don't have the slightest idea what
they're talking about either.

Bob

Jeff R. wrote:

Jeff R.
(63 hours and 53 minutes to go, and counting...)
about 40 hours now... oh the suspense!
My guess...
D-Mac will disappear for 3 months or so like he has done so
many times in the past. I think it happens when his doctors
realise he has stopped taking the medication and lock him
back up for a couple of months.
Did anyone else notice - that email that he sent Jeff
references YET ANOTHER internet domain that he has created.
On the new web page, there is a woman holding a phone. She
looks REMARKABLY similar to one of his "brides". There is
also a remarkable resemblance between his brides, and I'm
sure that some of the kids in his wedding portfolio are the
same ones that were holding the famous mirrored panorama.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again - I'm sure the
only weddings D-Mac has photographed are his own children.

The pixel Bandit wrote:
Pete D wrote:
Umm, Dougggy, this is a newsgroup mate, did you not notice?

LOL

Yeah I did actually but the ****wit's listed e-mail address ...the one
you have to maintain to keep your domain name, returns an error, just
like his listed residential address.


If his email address bounced how did he get this you dumb ****?

http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug-02.html

You aren't the worlds biggest asshole as your sig says you are the
worlds dopiest ****.

I haven't been bothered with this group for a long time but I get an
email today 'come and have a look Doug has had his biggest flip out in
years' and when I look he was right. Same ****, different name,
different day.

I am sure you can get help for your compulsive lying disorder Doggy.

I am just glad Jeff didn't wait for days next to the letter box back in
April last year waiting for your last threat.

^Tems^ wrote:
The pixel Bandit wrote:
Pete D wrote:
Umm, Dougggy, this is a newsgroup mate, did you not notice?

LOL

Yeah I did actually but the ****wit's listed e-mail address ...the one
you have to maintain to keep your domain name, returns an error, just
like his listed residential address.


If his email address bounced how did he get this you dumb ****?

http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug-02.html

You aren't the worlds biggest asshole as your sig says you are the
worlds dopiest ****.

I haven't been bothered with this group for a long time but I get an
email today 'come and have a look Doug has had his biggest flip out in
years' and when I look he was right. Same ****, different name,
different day.

I am sure you can get help for your compulsive lying disorder Doggy.

I am just glad Jeff didn't wait for days next to the letter box back in
April last year waiting for your last threat.




The ABN lookup

http://www.abr.business.gov.au/%28cj...1%29/main.aspx

Your search for Ryadia Pty Ltd found no matching records.

WHY?????????????????

"Jeff R." wrote in message
...
Atheist Chaplain wrote:
"The pixel Bandit" wrote in message
...
Jeff R. wrote:

Oh boy...
You finally got your wish... Fool.


--

WOW this should have Douggie hunkered over Google for ages so he can
pretend to be a legal eagle and bluff your host into submission, I DO
DO DO DO so want Douggie to try this because filing a false or
misleading DMCA complaint is punishable by fines in excess of $50,000
US and/or Gaol time LOL Should be fun to watch events unfold.

...and unfold they will.

Here is a copy of an email received this morning:

http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug-02.html

I have already (in a previous post in this thread) outlined the many
errors in Doug's charge(s), so I don't think its necessary to restate the
obvious.

I will, however, restate my sincere offer to remove all of the so-called
"offending material" if Doug will simply prove my assertions wrong, by
posting a copy of the alleged "stepped-out pano."

There is certainly no obligation under law for me to remove my page - but
I will do so if Doug can prove me wrong on the original issue.

Blustering threats don't impress me.

--
Jeff R.
(63 hours and 53 minutes to go, and counting...)

What strikes me is the fact that Douggie sent you the "take down" email
himself, having friends in the legal profession I can tell you that no
Solicitor/Barrister would ever let the plaintiff send such an email, it
would be sent from the plaintiffs legal representative and it would be sent
out via registered mail or courier. I smell another Douggie attempt at lies
and deception, it would actually be funny if it were not so pathetic and
predictable.
Sure Douggie can stir **** between you and your service provider but for a
hundred dollars (or free if the Solicitor see's the funny side of this) you
can get your REAL solicitor to send them a polite letter outlining your
stance and the legal precedents that you are using, then if Douggie makes a
false DMCA take down claim you can advise them and they can file AGAINST
Douggie for making a false of misleading DMCA take down claim, severe
penalties apply :-)
It also comes to mind Douggies claims that YOUR site is actually generating
traffic and income for him, so even the most naive Solicitor would see that
a claim for compensation would not only be laughed out of court on that
basis alone but the frivolous nature of the complaint would probably have a
Judge award costs against him :-)
I see nothing but Win Win for you and escalating costs for Douggie :-)
just for the record I am not a Solicitor and have no formal legal training,
all that I have posted here is my opinion, gained after a conversation with
a friend who is a real Solicitor (although he is in Corporate Law) so YMMV
:-)

--
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of
Scientology International]
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your
Christ." Gandhi

Atheist Chaplain wrote:

What strikes me is the fact that Douggie sent you the "take down"
email himself, having friends in the legal profession I can tell you
that no Solicitor/Barrister would ever let the plaintiff send such an
email, it would be sent from the plaintiffs legal representative and
it would be sent out via registered mail or courier.

In Douggie's defence (!), he has only sent warning that he *will* issue the
"take-down" order - he hasn't actually issued it.

As someone else suggested, I think Julian may have written it. :-)

As to the other stuff, thanks for the suggestions, but I'm not about to
telegraph my punches.

We'll all see.
Soon.

--
Jeff R.
27 hours and 4 mins to go (and counting)

-hh wrote:
On Aug 8, 6:27 am, "Jeff R." wrote:
Atheist Chaplain wrote:

What strikes me is the fact that Douggie sent you the "take down"
email himself, having friends in the legal profession I can tell you
that no Solicitor/Barrister would ever let the plaintiff send such
an email, it would be sent from the plaintiffs legal representative
and it would be sent out via registered mail or courier.

In Douggie's defence (!), he has only sent warning that he *will*
issue the "take-down" order - he hasn't actually issued it.

As someone else suggested, I think Julian may have written it. :-)

As to the other stuff, thanks for the suggestions, but I'm not about
to telegraph my punches.

We'll all see.
Soon.

Which reminds me ... I can't recall the URL of the supposedly
'offending' material. I do recall getting a good laugh out of it, so
I'd like to perhaps take one last look "just in case".


-hh

http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug.html

Not much risk of "one last look", though. I.m aware of at least two
anonymous mirrors of this page. There may be more. :-)

--
Jeff R.

Annika1980 wrote:
On Aug 8, 7:58 pm, "Jeff R." wrote:

Not much risk of "one last look", though. I.m aware of at least two
anonymous mirrors of this page. There may be more. :-)

--
Jeff R.

Hey Jeff, you forgot the countdown.
How many more hours until you get your pants sued off?

And what time is 12:00 Midnight Aussie time converted to American EDT?
Some of the lads here were thinking of shooting off some fireworks for
the occasion, but I think you guys are 15 hours ahead of us and I
don't want to wake the neighbors at 9:00 in the morning.

Sorry Bret.
I forgot.

We are normally GMT+10, but are now GMT+11 (DST)
(did I get that right? Add an hour for DST? I think that's right.)

As I type, it's 10:27 am AEDST, so:

--
Jeff R.
(13 hours and 33 minutes to go)