The big questions about DSLRs

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable lens
camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000?
Olympus. Will they dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive?
Sony. Will they release a non-boring entry level camera?
Fuji. Will they release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens
camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film days
and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

--
Ray Fischer

On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable lens
camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000?
Olympus. Will they dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive?
Sony. Will they release a non-boring entry level camera?
Fuji. Will they release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens
camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film days
and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do. The smart ones do today, anyway.
Check to see how many high-quality P&S cameras are bought compared to how
many cameras are bought with last century's archaic SLR design. The numbers
bought and used make the non-SLR designs the clear winners by a huge
margin.

Some of them even rival the print quality of up to 13x18" in size when
pitted against a medium-format sensored Hasselblad. Something that DSLRs
can't even do.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml

On 4/22/10 11:49 AM, in article ,
"Joel Connor" wrote:

On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable lens
camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000?
Olympus. Will they dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive?
Sony. Will they release a non-boring entry level camera?
Fuji. Will they release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens
camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film days
and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do. The smart ones do today, anyway.
Check to see how many high-quality P&S cameras are bought compared to how
many cameras are bought with last century's archaic SLR design. The numbers
bought and used make the non-SLR designs the clear winners by a huge
margin.

Some of them even rival the print quality of up to 13x18" in size when
pitted against a medium-format sensored Hasselblad. Something that DSLRs
can't even do.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml

OH LOOKIE!

The Troll has morphed another sock!

"Doctor, grab the Radiation Treatment. The cancer is spreading!"

Joel Connor wrote:
On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable lens
camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000?
Olympus. Will they dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive?
Sony. Will they release a non-boring entry level camera?
Fuji. Will they release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens
camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film days
and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do.

Oooo! Now we get the fantasies!

--
Ray Fischer

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:49:16 -0500, Joel Connor wrote:

On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
news:1fd97cd6-3a04-4e15-
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable
lens camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000? Olympus. Will they
dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive? Sony.
Will they release a non-boring entry level camera? Fuji. Will they
release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film
days and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do. The smart ones do today,
anyway. Check to see how many high-quality P&S cameras are bought
compared to how many cameras are bought with last century's archaic SLR
design. The numbers bought and used make the non-SLR designs the clear
winners by a huge margin.

Some of them even rival the print quality of up to 13x18" in size when
pitted against a medium-format sensored Hasselblad. Something that DSLRs
can't even do.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml

Going by that reasoning why are so many people using cameras that have the
old fashioned sixteenth century technology? i.e. lenses.



--
neil
Reverse ‘r’ + ‘a’ and remove ‘l’.
Linux counter 335851

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:46:42 -0500, Neil Ellwood
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:49:16 -0500, Joel Connor wrote:

On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
news:1fd97cd6-3a04-4e15-
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable
lens camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000? Olympus. Will they
dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive? Sony.
Will they release a non-boring entry level camera? Fuji. Will they
release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film
days and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do. The smart ones do today,
anyway. Check to see how many high-quality P&S cameras are bought
compared to how many cameras are bought with last century's archaic SLR
design. The numbers bought and used make the non-SLR designs the clear
winners by a huge margin.

Some of them even rival the print quality of up to 13x18" in size when
pitted against a medium-format sensored Hasselblad. Something that DSLRs
can't even do.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml

Going by that reasoning why are so many people using cameras that have the
old fashioned sixteenth century technology? i.e. lenses.

That's really stupid reasoning on your part. They aren't using sixteenth
century lens designs today. Are you going to claim then that any bronze
parts are being used from the Bronze-Age?

You're just another ****ing moron troll without a clue.

"Joel Connor" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:46:42 -0500, Neil Ellwood
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:49:16 -0500, Joel Connor wrote:

On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
news:1fd97cd6-3a04-4e15-
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable
lens camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000? Olympus. Will they
dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive? Sony.
Will they release a non-boring entry level camera? Fuji. Will they
release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film
days and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do. The smart ones do today,
anyway. Check to see how many high-quality P&S cameras are bought
compared to how many cameras are bought with last century's archaic SLR
design. The numbers bought and used make the non-SLR designs the clear
winners by a huge margin.

Some of them even rival the print quality of up to 13x18" in size when
pitted against a medium-format sensored Hasselblad. Something that DSLRs
can't even do.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml

Going by that reasoning why are so many people using cameras that have the
old fashioned sixteenth century technology? i.e. lenses.

That's really stupid reasoning on your part. They aren't using sixteenth
century lens designs today. Are you going to claim then that any bronze
parts are being used from the Bronze-Age?

You're just another ****ing moron troll without a clue.




Oh the irony..............

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:21:35 -0400, John A. wrote:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 06:24:26 +1000, "Pete D" wrote:


"Joel Connor" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:46:42 -0500, Neil Ellwood
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:49:16 -0500, Joel Connor wrote:

On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
news:1fd97cd6-3a04-4e15-
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable
lens camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000? Olympus. Will they
dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive? Sony.
Will they release a non-boring entry level camera? Fuji. Will they
release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens camera?
Sigma. Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film
days and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do. The smart ones do today,
anyway. Check to see how many high-quality P&S cameras are bought
compared to how many cameras are bought with last century's archaic SLR
design. The numbers bought and used make the non-SLR designs the clear
winners by a huge margin.

Some of them even rival the print quality of up to 13x18" in size when
pitted against a medium-format sensored Hasselblad. Something that DSLRs
can't even do.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml

Going by that reasoning why are so many people using cameras that have the
old fashioned sixteenth century technology? i.e. lenses.

That's really stupid reasoning on your part. They aren't using sixteenth
century lens designs today. Are you going to claim then that any bronze
parts are being used from the Bronze-Age?

You're just another ****ing moron troll without a clue.


Oh the irony..............

You get used to it. It is the infamous "p&s troll". Calling all the
regular/legit posters "trolls" is just part of its M.O. That and
frequently changing names to get around filters.

What part of the word "design" do you ****head trolls fail to comprehend?

Sand in the Sahara Desert is just sand, unless you apply a recent "design"
to it. Is he going to claim that sand grains are the integral modern design
of today's technology in lenses too?

You useless trolls sure do some far-fetched reaching to hold onto your
psychotic beliefs and red-herring evasions from truth and reality. But
then, that's why you are TROLLS and I am not.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:58:51 -0500, Joel Connor wrote:

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:46:42 -0500, Neil Ellwood
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:49:16 -0500, Joel Connor wrote:

On 22 Apr 2010 16:37:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Ray Shafranski wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
news:1fd97cd6-3a04-4e15-
...
Canon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored, interchangeable
lens camera?
Nikon. Will they release a compact non-mirrored camera and/or an ,
high megapixel FF camera that doesn't cost $8000? Olympus. Will
they dump DSLRs?
Pentax. Will they release a FF camera, will they survive? Sony.
Will they release a non-boring entry level camera? Fuji. Will they
release a new pro DSLR or any interchangeable lens camera? Sigma.
Does anyone care?
Samsung. Will they make a dent in 4/3rds sales?

The lifting mirror and the pentaprism/pentamirror are relics of film
days and should be replaced on all DSLR designs.

Gee, you're so smart. I wonder why millions of people don't listen to
you and simply abandon SLRs.

That must be sarcasm because millions do. The smart ones do today,
anyway. Check to see how many high-quality P&S cameras are bought
compared to how many cameras are bought with last century's archaic
SLR design. The numbers bought and used make the non-SLR designs the
clear winners by a huge margin.

Some of them even rival the print quality of up to 13x18" in size when
pitted against a medium-format sensored Hasselblad. Something that
DSLRs can't even do.

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml

Going by that reasoning why are so many people using cameras that have
the old fashioned sixteenth century technology? i.e. lenses.

That's really stupid reasoning on your part. They aren't using sixteenth
century lens designs today. Are you going to claim then that any bronze
parts are being used from the Bronze-Age?

You're just another ****ing moron troll without a clue.

You don't read what is actually written. Your irony meter is obviously non-
existant, try getting it refurbished.



--
neil
Reverse ‘r’ + ‘a’ and remove ‘l’.
Linux counter 335851

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:21:35 -0400, John A. wrote:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 06:24:26 +1000, "Pete D" wrote:


"Joel Connor" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:46:42 -0500, Neil Ellwood
wrote:

You're just another ****ing moron troll without a clue.


Oh the irony..............

You get used to it. It is the infamous "p&s troll". Calling all the
regular/legit posters "trolls" is just part of its M.O. That and
frequently changing names to get around filters.

Learn to read headers and you will soon find your error. I have always
used my own name and do not hide in any way.



--
neil
Reverse ‘r’ + ‘a’ and remove ‘l’.
Linux counter 335851