|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
August 3rd 04, 03:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
This film density CURVE thang!
Michael Scarpitti wrote:
: "jjs" wrote in message ... : My first guess regarding the applicable part of the Kodak charts was almost : certainly wrong. : : The original: http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/...5mm_curves.gif has : been replaced with a corrected graphic. Added to the information is a : similar chart showing TMax : http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/tmax-curve.gif : : If these are correct, then TMax and Tri-X (35mm) curves appear to be vastly : different. : Yes, they are, and that makes a difference in outdoor work above all. That's true. The differences are also what make the Tmax films far superior to Tri-X for both outdoor work with uncontrolable lighting and indoors when used with studio lighting. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- 
|
|
#72
August 3rd 04, 03:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This film density CURVE thang!
Frank Pittel wrote in message ...
Michael Scarpitti wrote: : "jjs" wrote in message ... : My first guess regarding the applicable part of the Kodak charts was almost : certainly wrong. : : The original: http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/...5mm_curves.gif has : been replaced with a corrected graphic. Added to the information is a : similar chart showing TMax : http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/tmax-curve.gif : : If these are correct, then TMax and Tri-X (35mm) curves appear to be vastly : different. : Yes, they are, and that makes a difference in outdoor work above all. That's true. The differences are also what make the Tmax films far superior to Tri-X for both outdoor work with uncontrolable lighting and indoors when used with studio lighting. You're an asshole, you know that?
|
|
#73
August 3rd 04, 03:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This film density CURVE thang!
Frank Pittel wrote in message ...
Michael Scarpitti wrote: : "jjs" wrote in message ... : My first guess regarding the applicable part of the Kodak charts was almost : certainly wrong. : : The original: http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/...5mm_curves.gif has : been replaced with a corrected graphic. Added to the information is a : similar chart showing TMax : http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/tmax-curve.gif : : If these are correct, then TMax and Tri-X (35mm) curves appear to be vastly : different. : Yes, they are, and that makes a difference in outdoor work above all. That's true. The differences are also what make the Tmax films far superior to Tri-X for both outdoor work with uncontrolable lighting and indoors when used with studio lighting. You're an asshole, you know that?
|
|
#74
August 3rd 04, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This film density CURVE thang!
Michael Scarpitti wrote:
: Frank Pittel wrote in message ... : Michael Scarpitti wrote: : : "jjs" wrote in message ... : : My first guess regarding the applicable part of the Kodak charts was almost : : certainly wrong. : : : : The original: http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/...5mm_curves.gif has : : been replaced with a corrected graphic. Added to the information is a : : similar chart showing TMax : : http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/tmax-curve.gif : : : : If these are correct, then TMax and Tri-X (35mm) curves appear to be vastly : : different. : : : Yes, they are, and that makes a difference in outdoor work above all. : : That's true. The differences are also what make the Tmax films far superior to Tri-X : for both outdoor work with uncontrollable lighting and indoors when used with studio : lighting. : You're an asshole, you know that? It's nice to finally see you admit to being wrong. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you -------------------
|
|
#75
August 3rd 04, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This film density CURVE thang!
Michael Scarpitti wrote:
: Frank Pittel wrote in message ... : Michael Scarpitti wrote: : : "jjs" wrote in message ... : : My first guess regarding the applicable part of the Kodak charts was almost : : certainly wrong. : : : : The original: http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/...5mm_curves.gif has : : been replaced with a corrected graphic. Added to the information is a : : similar chart showing TMax : : http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/tmax-curve.gif : : : : If these are correct, then TMax and Tri-X (35mm) curves appear to be vastly : : different. : : : Yes, they are, and that makes a difference in outdoor work above all. : : That's true. The differences are also what make the Tmax films far superior to Tri-X : for both outdoor work with uncontrollable lighting and indoors when used with studio : lighting. : You're an asshole, you know that? It's nice to finally see you admit to being wrong. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you -------------------
|
|
#76
August 3rd 04, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This film density CURVE thang!
Frank Pittel wrote in message ...
Michael Scarpitti wrote: : "jjs" wrote in message ... : My first guess regarding the applicable part of the Kodak charts was almost : certainly wrong. : : The original: http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/...5mm_curves.gif has : been replaced with a corrected graphic. Added to the information is a : similar chart showing TMax : http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/tmax-curve.gif : : If these are correct, then TMax and Tri-X (35mm) curves appear to be vastly : different. : Yes, they are, and that makes a difference in outdoor work above all. That's true. The differences are also what make the Tmax films far superior to Tri-X for both outdoor work with uncontrolable lighting and indoors when used with studio lighting. How, O Moron of all morons, does that work?
|
|
#77
August 3rd 04, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
This film density CURVE thang!
Frank Pittel wrote in message ...
Michael Scarpitti wrote: : "jjs" wrote in message ... : My first guess regarding the applicable part of the Kodak charts was almost : certainly wrong. : : The original: http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/...5mm_curves.gif has : been replaced with a corrected graphic. Added to the information is a : similar chart showing TMax : http://course1.winona.edu/jstafford/tmax-curve.gif : : If these are correct, then TMax and Tri-X (35mm) curves appear to be vastly : different. : Yes, they are, and that makes a difference in outdoor work above all. That's true. The differences are also what make the Tmax films far superior to Tri-X for both outdoor work with uncontrolable lighting and indoors when used with studio lighting. How, O Moron of all morons, does that work?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it Copal or copal? Then what is it? | Nick Zentena | Large Format Photography Equipment | 14 | July 27th 04 03:31 AM |
| Insane new TSA rule for film inspection | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 94 | June 23rd 04 05:17 AM |
| Contrast Index Question: Newbie | In The Trenches | In The Darkroom | 24 | June 1st 04 01:14 AM |
| The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... | Todd Bailey | Film & Labs | 0 | May 27th 04 08:12 AM |
| Density Streaks on Film | Alparslan | In The Darkroom | 11 | March 29th 04 02:03 AM |
Linear Mode
