If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
New Canon TX-1 Looks Weird
"J. Clarke" wrote in message ... Who said anything about playing the files in your camera? You seem to be having trouble with the notion that there are players that do not have any editing capability. Windows Media Player for example. Winamp for another. And why do you assume people with a computer are incapable of running anything else, even a simple file conversion program that could come with the camera? Again, you're confusing the issue when you introduce editing. Player not equal editor. And a simple file conversion program is not equal to editor either. But I'm not interested in debating semantics. No, unless you want to record more than 4 GB of data and play it back with any random player without having to first find the pieces and rename them to the player's naming convention. Which can all be done automatically if appropriate software is used to download from the camera. Just as some camera's do now. However in this case it appears that that is not being done so what is "not uncommon" is irrelevant. No it's not, ALL I said was it CAN be done. What manufacturers *choose* to do is not something I spend my time worrying about. MrT. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
New Canon TX-1 Looks Weird
"J. Clarke" wrote in message ... Audio recorders face the problem of dealing with files larger than 4 GB????? That's about 6 hours at CD quality. But not when you are recording 24/96 (or even 24/192) pro formats. You also need to split each track into separate files when recording multi-track. MrT. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
New Canon TX-1 Looks Weird
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:34:09 +1100, "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:
"J. Clarke" wrote in message .. . Who said anything about playing the files in your camera? You seem to be having trouble with the notion that there are players that do not have any editing capability. Windows Media Player for example. Winamp for another. And why do you assume people with a computer are incapable of running anything else, even a simple file conversion program that could come with the camera? Because I've dealt with more users than you have? Again, you're confusing the issue when you introduce editing. Player not equal editor. And a simple file conversion program is not equal to editor either. But I'm not interested in debating semantics. Nor it is equal to a least common denominator player. No, unless you want to record more than 4 GB of data and play it back with any random player without having to first find the pieces and rename them to the player's naming convention. Which can all be done automatically if appropriate software is used to download from the camera. Just as some camera's do now. And how about if you are reading the card directly and not downloading from the camera? However in this case it appears that that is not being done so what is "not uncommon" is irrelevant. No it's not, ALL I said was it CAN be done. What manufacturers *choose* to do is not something I spend my time worrying about. Then why are you fussing about it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Canon TX-1 Looks Weird | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital Photography | 43 | February 25th 07 06:24 AM |
Weird Canon numbering scheme? (198-9900) | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 5 | January 23rd 07 01:45 PM |
Weird problem with Canon printer | Don Stauffer | Digital Photography | 8 | February 23rd 06 04:10 PM |