[SI] More Sounds Posted

Made you look!

On 9/28/2010 5:21 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 10-09-27 9:15 , tony cooper wrote:

I should have written depth-of-field. Dunno why focus came out.

It was entirely clear to everyone. Only Tony "Bruce" Polson would bring
it up with a snide comment. (He could have asked, "Did you mean to say
'depth of field?'" instead).



He can be counted on to make comments, usually snide, regardless of
whether there is a factual basis.

--
Peter

On 10-09-28 18:50 , tony cooper wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:21:06 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 10-09-27 9:15 , tony cooper wrote:

I should have written depth-of-field. Dunno why focus came out.

It was entirely clear to everyone. Only Tony "Bruce" Polson would bring
it up with a snide comment. (He could have asked, "Did you mean to say
'depth of field?'" instead).

Yes, it was probably clear, but I've been known to criticize others
for choosing the wrong word or phrase so this is a case of my own
petard blowing up in my face.

Besides, I don't get at all offended by being called out on an error.

Nobody should, but the means of it are something else.

--
gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.

On 10-09-28 18:50 , tony cooper wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:21:06 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 10-09-27 9:15 , tony cooper wrote:

I should have written depth-of-field. Dunno why focus came out.

It was entirely clear to everyone. Only Tony "Bruce" Polson would bring
it up with a snide comment. (He could have asked, "Did you mean to say
'depth of field?'" instead).

Yes, it was probably clear, but I've been known to criticize others
for choosing the wrong word or phrase so this is a case of my own
petard blowing up in my face.

Besides, I don't get at all offended by being called out on an error.

Nobody should, but the means of it are something else.

--
gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.