Rita spotted!

http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/vi...=viewportfolio

I think Rita's lost some weight.

On Oct 29, 6:55 pm, "Kinon O'Cann" wrote:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/vi...=viewportfolio

I think Rita's lost some weight.

I wonder if that chick climbed that tree? Perhaps that's what made it
fall over.

You are blocked from viewing the photo that you selected by the content
filter.
The photo that you are trying to view has a rating of -3 and an effective
content advisory of X (may be unsuitable for children), which may be
different from its content advisory category, as some categories, such as
Erotic, imply a higher content advisory.

You may change the content filter and proceed to view the photo, or you may
cancel and return to the previous page. If you change the content filter,
then the new setting will stay in effect until you close your browser or
sign out.


"Kinon O'Cann" wrote in message
news:OxtVi.4770$8R1.1215@trndny02...
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/vi...=viewportfolio

I think Rita's lost some weight.

Douglas wrote:
You are blocked from viewing the photo that you selected by the content
filter.
The photo that you are trying to view has a rating of -3 and an effective
content advisory of X (may be unsuitable for children), which may be
different from its content advisory category, as some categories, such as
Erotic, imply a higher content advisory.

You may change the content filter and proceed to view the photo, or you may
cancel and return to the previous page. If you change the content filter,
then the new setting will stay in effect until you close your browser or
sign out.


"Kinon O'Cann" wrote in message
news:OxtVi.4770$8R1.1215@trndny02...
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/vi...=viewportfolio

Just change it to -6 and you'll be good.

"Cynicor" wrote in message
...
Douglas wrote:
You are blocked from viewing the photo that you selected by the content
filter.
The photo that you are trying to view has a rating of -3 and an effective
content advisory of X (may be unsuitable for children), which may be
different from its content advisory category, as some categories, such as
Erotic, imply a higher content advisory.

You may change the content filter and proceed to view the photo, or you
may cancel and return to the previous page. If you change the content
filter, then the new setting will stay in effect until you close your
browser or sign out.


"Kinon O'Cann" wrote in message
news:OxtVi.4770$8R1.1215@trndny02...
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/vi...=viewportfolio

Just change it to -6 and you'll be good.

That's not the issue.

Kinon posted a link to a lewd picture on a rated site but he posted it from
a general audience site. Children do read this group and the foul mouthed
idiots who think it's OK to swear and those who post lewd links could likely
get the group rated and it would be out of bounds to many readers then.

He could have included a warning but chose not to. Poor form.

Douglas

"Douglas" wrote in message
...
You are blocked from viewing the photo that you selected by the content
filter.
The photo that you are trying to view has a rating of -3 and an effective
content advisory of X (may be unsuitable for children), which may be
different from its content advisory category, as some categories, such as
Erotic, imply a higher content advisory.

You may change the content filter and proceed to view the photo, or you
may cancel and return to the previous page. If you change the content
filter, then the new setting will stay in effect until you close your
browser or sign out.

I have no idea of what to change the content filter to....I tried everything
from -10 to +10 and I still couldn't see the photo.....The least they could
do is tell you how their "scale" works.....Are larger negative numbers more
likely to allow viewing the picture, or the other way around? And, How does
one go about changing the number? The website implies that it can be done
right there, on the spot. Or, do I have to go inside my computer in the
control Panel somewhere to do this? At any rate, the instructions were so
poor that I lost interest, and went on to doing something else, that had a
little more logic in it.........

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:52:40 GMT, "Douglas" wrote:


"Cynicor" wrote in message
...
Douglas wrote:
You are blocked from viewing the photo that you selected by the content
filter.
The photo that you are trying to view has a rating of -3 and an effective
content advisory of X (may be unsuitable for children), which may be
different from its content advisory category, as some categories, such as
Erotic, imply a higher content advisory.

You may change the content filter and proceed to view the photo, or you
may cancel and return to the previous page. If you change the content
filter, then the new setting will stay in effect until you close your
browser or sign out.


"Kinon O'Cann" wrote in message
news:OxtVi.4770$8R1.1215@trndny02...
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/vi...=viewportfolio

Just change it to -6 and you'll be good.

That's not the issue.

Kinon posted a link to a lewd picture on a rated site but he posted it from
a general audience site. Children do read this group and the foul mouthed
idiots who think it's OK to swear and those who post lewd links could likely
get the group rated and it would be out of bounds to many readers then.

He could have included a warning but chose not to. Poor form.

Douglas




Oh look! An emotionally stunted control-freak that's insecure about "scary"
words and likes to call them "curse words" to manipulate others to its level of
insecurity and immaturity.

What a ****ed up person!

I bet you're the same kind of person that doesn't mind seeing someone's ****in'
brains being blown away on a movie screen, but ... don't say **** YOU! while it
happens, right?

What a total asswipe.

Take your ****ed up "family values" and shove them up your stinkin' wife's ****.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One more thing. I don't babysit your ****ed up brats unless you pay me for it.
If YOU want people to babysit for you PAY THEM. If YOU don't want your ****ed up
spawn reading these words then YOU turn off YOUR ****in' computer!

You ****in' loser!

If you want to pop out useless brats then YOU take responsibility for them. Quit
pawning off YOUR JOB on everyone else you useless ASSWIPE BREEDER!

Then began 'He's So Funny! ' to curse and to swear:

Note: Vulgar posting not quoted.

This is a family news group in which children and young adults read. It is *your* social responsibility as an adult to demonstrate proper Usenet etiquette.

Please refrain from cursing and swearing.
--
Gabriel Gowdel

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:05:03 -0000, Gabriel Gowdel wrote:

Then began 'He's So Funny! ' to curse and to swear:

Note: Vulgar posting not quoted.

This is a family news group in which children and young adults read. It is *your* social responsibility as an adult to demonstrate proper Usenet etiquette.

Please refrain from cursing and swearing.



Oh look! An emotionally stunted control-freak that's insecure about "scary"
words and likes to call them "curse words" to manipulate others to its level of
insecurity and immaturity.

What a ****ed up person!

I bet you're the same kind of person that doesn't mind seeing someone's ****in'
brains being blown away on a movie screen, but ... don't say **** YOU! while it
happens, right?

What a total asswipe.

Take your ****ed up "family values" and shove them up your stinkin' wife's ****.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One more thing. I don't babysit your ****ed up brats unless you pay me for it.
If YOU want people to babysit for you PAY THEM. If YOU don't want your ****ed up
spawn reading these words then YOU turn off YOUR ****in' computer!

You ****in' loser!

If you want to pop out useless brats then YOU take responsibility for them. Quit
pawning off YOUR JOB on everyone else you useless ASSWIPE BREEDER!

Then began 'He's So Funny! ' to curse and to swear:

Note: Vulgar posting not quoted.

This is a family news group in which children and young adults read. It is *your* social responsibility as an adult to demonstrate proper Usenet etiquette.

Please refrain from cursing and swearing.
--
Gabriel Gowdel