If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
Those who bought various Canon cameras recently (past couple of years) talk about their cameras and the features they have. Some say how good the results are. It is OK to do that.
However, very few mention what lenses they are using and how the various lenses they own compare against each other and what they have owned previously. In a few years the camera they have may be upgrades but the lenses may be the same. So how do the Canon lenses stack up. More specifically how to the comparable models (Nikon and Canon specifically) stack up against each other. And I do not mean the stupid resolution tests but the real world comparison of the actual images of different types. And that includes sharpness, color, vignetting, and other characteristics that make for a nice acceptable image. And not just that one is better than another since some of that can be preference but what are the actual differences. So the answer is more than just saying the results from XYZ is better or I liked the color better or was more accurate but how does one actually describe the difference. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:44:24 +0000, measekite wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" html head /head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"Those who bought various Canon cameras recently (past couple of years) talk about their cameras and the features they have. Some say how good the results are. It is OK to do that.br br However, very few mention what lenses they are using and how the various lenses they own compare against each other and what they have owned previously.br br In a few years the camera they have may be upgrades but the lenses may be the same. So how do the Canon lenses stack up.br br br More specifically how to the comparable models (Nikon and Canon specifically) stack up against each other. And I do not mean the stupid resolution tests but the real world comparison of the actual images of different types. And that includes sharpness, color, vignetting, and other characteristics that make for a nice acceptable image.br br And not just that one is better than another since some of that can be preference but what are the actual differences.br br So the answer is more than just saying the results from XYZ is better or I liked the color better or was more accurate but how does one actually describe the difference.br /font /body /html Did you ever do a web search? BTW - you might also learn, someday, that questions end with '?', not '.'. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
"ray" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:44:24 +0000, measekite wrote: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" html head /head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"Those who bought various Canon cameras recently (past couple of years) talk about their cameras and the features they have. Some say how good the results are. It is OK to do that.br br However, very few mention what lenses they are using and how the various lenses they own compare against each other and what they have owned previously.br br In a few years the camera they have may be upgrades but the lenses may be the same. So how do the Canon lenses stack up.br br br More specifically how to the comparable models (Nikon and Canon specifically) stack up against each other. And I do not mean the stupid resolution tests but the real world comparison of the actual images of different types. And that includes sharpness, color, vignetting, and other characteristics that make for a nice acceptable image.br br And not just that one is better than another since some of that can be preference but what are the actual differences.br br So the answer is more than just saying the results from XYZ is better or I liked the color better or was more accurate but how does one actually describe the difference.br /font /body /html Did you ever do a web search? BTW - you might also learn, someday, that questions end with '?', not '.'. My idea. What an arrogant idiot.. (no question mark) -- Focus |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
In article ,
measekite wrote: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" html head /head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"Those who bought various Canon cameras recently (past couple of years) talk about their cameras and the features they have. Some say how good the results are. It is OK to do that.br HTML **** snipped Are you ever going to get a ****ing clue and stop posting in HTML? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
In article ,
wrote: Are you ever going to get a ****ing clue and stop posting in HTML? If you had ever been to comp.periphs.printers, you'd know the true story. The guy's retarded. I should know better than to click on one of his messages. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
ray wrote: On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:44:24 +0000, measekite wrote: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font face="sans-serif">Those who bought various Canon cameras recently (past couple of years) talk about their cameras and the features they have.&nbsp; Some say how good the results are.&nbsp; It is OK to do that.<br> <br> However, very few mention what lenses they are using and how the various lenses they own compare against each other and what they have owned previously.<br> <br> In a few years the camera they have may be upgrades but the lenses may be the same.&nbsp; So how do the Canon lenses stack up.<br> <br> <br> More specifically how to the comparable models (Nikon and Canon specifically) stack up against each other.&nbsp; And I do not mean the stupid resolution tests but the real world comparison of the actual images of different types.&nbsp; And that includes sharpness, color, vignetting, and other characteristics that make for a nice acceptable image.<br> <br> And not just that one is better than another since some of that can be preference but what are the actual differences.<br> <br> So the answer is more than just saying the results from XYZ is better or I liked the color better or was more accurate but how does one actually describe the difference.<br> </font> </body> </html> Did you ever do a web search? BTW - you might also learn, someday, that questions end with '?', not '.'. I do not need an engleeeesh leson. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
Mr. Strat wrote: In article , wrote: Are you ever going to get a ****ing clue and stop posting in HTML? If you had ever been to comp.periphs.printers, you'd know the true story. The guy's retarded. I should know better than to click on one of his messages. Since you do click what does that make you????? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
measekite wrote:
Mr. Strat wrote: In article , measekite wrote: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" html head /head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"Those who bought various Canon cameras recently (past couple of years) talk about their cameras and the features they have. Some say how good the results are. It is OK to do that.br HTML **** snipped Are you ever going to get a ****ing clue and stop posting in HTML? Glad you assked that question. *NO* Don't post in HTML. This isn't WebTV/AOL/Prodigy. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
If you buy Canon
Mr. Strat wrote:
Are you ever going to get a ****ing clue and stop posting in HTML? Are you ever going to get a decent newsreader? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon should be totally ashamed of this (and some others too) HP got this basic and absolutely essential thing right in their little digicam that's cheap even for a P&S, so why can't Canon?!! Yes, I know, there's more to the Canon 20D, but w | Mike Henley | Digital Photography | 58 | December 15th 04 05:21 PM |