Tuesday 11th August 2009 (AEST) - 36 hours since Doggy's threat

http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug.html

Where is he?

^Tems^ wrote:
http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug.html

Where is he?

Give him time.
Even allowing for unforseens, it'll take a number of email exchanges before
the excreta hits the ventilator.

No email here yet.... :-(

--
Jeff R.
(+37 hours and 18 mins, not that I'm counting)

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:18:34 +1000, "Jeff R." wrote:
: ^Tems^ wrote:
: http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug.html
:
: Where is he?
:
: Give him time.
: Even allowing for unforseens, it'll take a number of email exchanges before
: the excreta hits the ventilator.
:
: No email here yet.... :-(

You can say what you want to about Doug. But I can't help being amused by the
degree to which he controls the discussion, just by staying out of it. ;^)

Bob

Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 18/08/2009 9:19 PM:
On Aug 17, 11:31 pm, Robert Coe wrote:
You can say what you want to about Doug. But I can't help being amused by the
degree to which he controls the discussion, just by staying out of it. ;^)

Bob

Keeping Doug out of the discussions is a good thing.

Rattling on and on about him like you and the other idiots here do is a great
thing.
All he has to do is bait and you're all off barkng for days on end!
The guy must be laughing his arse off at your collective expense and has been
doing so for years now.
Please carry on, it's a great example of the total idiocy of the Usenet.
LOL!

Noons wrote:
Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 18/08/2009 9:19 PM:
On Aug 17, 11:31 pm, Robert Coe wrote:
You can say what you want to about Doug. But I can't help being
amused by the degree to which he controls the discussion, just by
staying out of it. ;^)

Bob

Keeping Doug out of the discussions is a good thing.

Rattling on and on about him like you and the other idiots here do is
a great thing.

Unlike your fine example of restraint, huh Noonsie?

--
Jeff R.

"Jeff R." wrote in message
...
Noons wrote:
Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 18/08/2009 9:19 PM:
On Aug 17, 11:31 pm, Robert Coe wrote:
You can say what you want to about Doug. But I can't help being
amused by the degree to which he controls the discussion, just by
staying out of it. ;^) Bob

Keeping Doug out of the discussions is a good thing.

Rattling on and on about him like you and the other idiots here do is
a great thing.

Unlike your fine example of restraint, huh Noonsie?

--
Jeff R.


you do know noons is to obtuse to see that point Jeff :-)

--
[This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of
Scientology International]
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your
Christ." Gandhi

Atheist Chaplain wrote:
"Jeff R." wrote in message
...
Noons wrote:
Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 18/08/2009 9:19 PM:
On Aug 17, 11:31 pm, Robert Coe wrote:
You can say what you want to about Doug. But I can't help being
amused by the degree to which he controls the discussion, just by
staying out of it. ;^) Bob

Keeping Doug out of the discussions is a good thing.

Rattling on and on about him like you and the other idiots here do is
a great thing.

Unlike your fine example of restraint, huh Noonsie?

you do know noons is to obtuse to see that point Jeff :-)

Er, no! Noonsie will understand; it's just that that won't stop him from
appearing obtuse, much less cause him to post less!

Or something.....

--
John McWilliams

I know that you believe you understood what you think I said, but I'm
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

Noons wrote:
Jeff R. wrote,on my timestamp of 19/08/2009 9:28 PM:


Rattling on and on about him like you and the other idiots here do
is a great thing.

Unlike your fine example of restraint, huh Noonsie?

You'd have done better to shut up instead of demonstrating yet again
your utter stupidity

uh huh.

Who ****ed in your Cornflakes?

--
Jeff R.

Jeff R. wrote,on my timestamp of 19/08/2009 9:28 PM:


Rattling on and on about him like you and the other idiots here do is
a great thing.

Unlike your fine example of restraint, huh Noonsie?

You'd have done better to shut up instead of demonstrating yet again your utter
stupidity

Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 20/08/2009 12:20 AM:


Noons, I will gladly put my newsgroup contributions up against yours
any day.

BWAHAHAHAHA! What are your "contributions", idiot?
Your deranged, grossly over-sharpened, stuffed bird photos with uppercase post
headers lauding whatever crap second rate gear you used for them instead of the
technique used? Immediately followed on cue by deranged gushing from your
arse-kissing "Helen"?
Do you even understand how childishly ridiculous you are, moron?


You offer nothing but insults, empty threats, and discord.

As opposed to cowardly defacing kid's photos to attack adults and having your
email in aol cancelled as a result - all your speciality, is it not?
How many emails have you received in aol in the last 1.5 years, "annika1980"?
What, using a false email is another one of your "contributions"?
Right up there with the false "exif" info in your photos, isn't it?
Do you even post ANYTHING about photography, moron?


Every once in a great while you might make a comment about film, but
that's about as rare as a total eclipse, and about as relevant.

They are not comments, moron. They are facts.
Something you are totally unfamiliar with. Unless you count
your "exif info" as a "fact"?

Facts are what's left after your hot air talk evaporates, Bret.
Where is your annika1980 email in aol, liar?
Have you EVER posted a technical explanation in reply to anyone, liar?
Have you ever posted a correct exif in your photos, liar?
Would you like me to continue, liar?

Oh, don't bother asking one of your arse-kissing trolls to reply with a veiled
threat, you should know by now I'm not in the least afraid of any of you, singly
or severally. Got it?