If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
My First Wedding
"embee" wrote in message ... Hello, I've just posted some pictures I took at a recent wedding and I'd be very grateful to group members if they'd have a look and tell me what they think. First, some background: Two things: 1. Watch your backgrounds. Two many of the shots have heads intersecting with strong horizontal lines, vertical lines cutting people down the middle, etc. 2. Don't place the focus of attention dead center in the frame. When you're shooting people, heads belong in the top third of the picture, not the smack in the center. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
My First Wedding
embee wrote: I'd welcome comments about what I got wrong and what I got right, as well as any advice on how I can improve. Thanks for looking: http://www.pbase.com/midie/wedding I fought a similar battle recently at my niece's wedding. http://www.pbase.com/bret/christa I could have gotten a lot more quality shots, but most of them would have been dupes of what the official photographer shot. So I just stayed out of his way and tried to fill in where I could with some candids. Afterwards, you'll always second-guess yourself and think of shots you should have taken (at least I did), but I guess all that pre-planning comes from experience. As you can see from your shots, the outdoor shots ended up looking the most natural. The ones inside suffer from the overuse of direct on-camera flash (bounced is better) and the various skin tones due to white balance problems. This is normal when you have a combination of light sources such as room light and window light. One way to handle it is to do a custom white balance using something like a WhiBal card. This will get you closer to the "correct" color when shooting indoors. In my wedding shoot, I was only able to take a few shots outdoors and naturally, those are the ones that looked the best. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
My First Wedding
"PTravel" wrote in message ... "embee" wrote in message ... Hello, I've just posted some pictures I took at a recent wedding and I'd be very grateful to group members if they'd have a look and tell me what they think. First, some background: Two things: 1. Watch your backgrounds. Two many of the shots have heads intersecting with strong horizontal lines, vertical lines cutting people down the middle, etc. As soon as I opened the pictures after the wedding, I realised my framing was inadequate. I was limited in my choice of shooting positions (because the pro was working nearby most of the time) but I accept I could have done better and your point about strong lines intersecting with subjects is one I will take on board in future. Thanks for the post. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
My First Wedding
"Annika1980" wrote in message oups.com... embee wrote: I'd welcome comments about what I got wrong and what I got right, as well as any advice on how I can improve. Thanks for looking: http://www.pbase.com/midie/wedding I fought a similar battle recently at my niece's wedding. http://www.pbase.com/bret/christa Some nice shots! I could have gotten a lot more quality shots, but most of them would have been dupes of what the official photographer shot. So I just stayed out of his way and tried to fill in where I could with some candids. Afterwards, you'll always second-guess yourself and think of shots you should have taken (at least I did), but I guess all that pre-planning comes from experience. Next time I plan to capitalise on the fact that the pro is concentrating on getting the standard shots - I will take a longer lens as well as my 24-105 and exclusively look for the off-guard, unposed moments. As you can see from your shots, the outdoor shots ended up looking the most natural. The ones inside suffer from the overuse of direct on-camera flash (bounced is better) and the various skin tones due to white balance problems. This is normal when you have a combination of light sources such as room light and window light. One way to handle it is to do a custom white balance using something like a WhiBal card. This will get you closer to the "correct" color when shooting indoors. In my wedding shoot, I was only able to take a few shots outdoors and naturally, those are the ones that looked the best. I did bounce the flash in some of the indoor shots, but in others the ceiling was way too high and the ones I bounced off the walls didn't work out. My big mistake was forgetting my difuser. Doh!! I've always managed to do without a white balance card in the past, but I may revise my opinion and get one for the next wedding or indoor event I do. I can see where one would be useful!. Thanks for posting. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
My First Wedding
embee wrote:
"Joseph Meehan" wrote in message ... Phil wrote: OP: Frankly I almost totally skipped over your images until I read the fact that you recognized the difference between your responsibilities and the professionals and the need for the pro to have primary access. Those are the photos that everyone expects and had better be there or someone will be mad, even if it is not the bride or groom, it may be the mother or aunt or brother. Thanks Joseph, I was VERY conscious of this, and went to great lengths not to step on any toes (figuratively speaking!) The pro was there to do his job, which pays his bills. I was there as a guest, hoping to get a couple of nice pictures while also enjoying a happy day. Two totally different roles. I didn't have the same access to the posed shots of the bride and groom, but then again I wasn't earning my living that day. Next time I find myself in a similar situation, I'll remember to take along a longer lens - I feel I could have got some nice unguarded candids working around the fringes of the event, instead of trying for posed shots. It's an excuse to go shopping for a nice 200mm L lens anyway......! Cheers. You did a good job both photographicly and professionally (being aware that your job was different than that of the paid professional and allowing them to do their job) If you see you are going to do this again, I would only make one suggestion. Go to the library and try to find a book or two on wedding photography. Most will have list and examples of standard wedding photos. They will also have a number of very good non-standard photos. That along with photos from friends and family will be good sources of ideas. You do not need to copy or get all the photos on a list, that is a chore for the professional, but they can give you ideas for what you do best. I also suggest asking people what pictures they like best. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D&G Wedding Photography | SkipM | Digital Photography | 28 | August 16th 06 08:50 PM |
Wedding Album Maker updated! | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | July 3rd 06 09:43 AM |
Wedding Album Maker updated! | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | June 28th 06 07:36 AM |
New release of Wedding Album Maker! | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | June 27th 06 04:25 AM |
Attn. Wedding Photographers | Jerry Dycus | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 7th 03 07:42 PM |