If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nice macro shot of a wasp
Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Wow...superb....
"RichA" wrote in message news Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely worth it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Franklin wrote:
Wow...superb.... "RichA" wrote in message news Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely worth it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645 So where is all the noise these E300's are supposed to generate? -- Douglas... It's traditional, painter's use it, Rembrandt used it. Now you can put your photos on it too! http://www.canvasphotos.com.au |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
RichA wrote:
Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely worth it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645 Judging by contrasty edge halos a little heavy on the sharpenning and/or contrast in PS. The scale is very nice of course. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
So where is all the noise these E300's are supposed to generate? Looks like it been noise reduced by resizing etc and then sharpened, if you look closely at the flower there are signs of noise, but still a pretty good picture at this size |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Ryadia@Home" wrote:
Steve Franklin wrote: Wow...superb.... "RichA" wrote in message news Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely worth it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645 So where is all the noise these E300's are supposed to generate? It is an absolute certainty in the mind of people who haven't ever used the E300, for example Alan Browne. It is also to be found on digital photography web sites that are not sponsored by Olympus, such as dpr*****.com, often quoted or used as a source by people who know next to nothing about photography to make "authoritative" statements on here about equipment they haven't ever used, for example ... .... I'm sure you can guess. ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tony Polson wrote:
It is an absolute certainty in the mind of people who haven't ever used the E300, for example Alan Browne. Used it? yes. Much? No. Liked it? Too small, dim viewfinder. Opinion on noise : dpreview graphs. The E-1 in particular; the E300 ain't great either. It is also to be found on digital photography web sites that are not sponsored by Olympus, such as dpr*****.com, often quoted or used as a Lack of advertising might indicate another problem: "Those *******s at dpreview are daring to tell the truth about our noisy Olympus camera. Pull the advert dollars!!!" It rubs that way more than the opposite... source by people who know next to nothing about photography to make "authoritative" statements on here about equipment they haven't ever used, for example ... My statements regarding noise and the 4/3 system are clearly in regard to future higher density models with the small sensor size. But Tony Polson is a great expert at quoting out of context, selective snipping and plain old sniping at those who disagree with him. Or who have caught him in one of his numerous truth bending episodes: -Paris Match cover from the 1970's. Show it Polson. -.E-1 with 8 Mpixel sensor (BWAAHAHA) .Consumer version of E-1 with 5 Mpix. (Bwahahha) .ordered an "E-2" (Bwaahahsh). -Generalities on aperture size and sharpness -50 rolls of film per average *week* -Says Nat Geo Field Guide is greatest thing since sliced bread (In "gushing" terms, pathetic really) -Then says it sucks ... which is it Polson? ... etc. ... Tony Polson: it is long past time for you to post proof that you have any talent approaching your claims. Cheers, Alan. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"RichA" wrote in message news Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely worth it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645 Nice shot. I guess you got lucky finding a deaf, dumb and blind bee. LOL |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:14:24 -0600, "Sheldon"
wrote: "RichA" wrote in message news Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely worth it. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645 Nice shot. I guess you got lucky finding a deaf, dumb and blind bee. LOL Not my shot, but similar questions were asked of the shooter! -Rich |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne wrote:
Tony Polson wrote: It is an absolute certainty in the mind of people who haven't ever used the E300, for example Alan Browne. Used it? yes. Much? No. Liked it? Too small, dim viewfinder. Opinion on noise : dpreview graphs. The E-1 in particular; the E300 ain't great either. It is also to be found on digital photography web sites that are not sponsored by Olympus, such as dpr*****.com, often quoted or used as a Lack of advertising might indicate another problem: "Those *******s at dpreview are daring to tell the truth about our noisy Olympus camera. Pull the advert dollars!!!" It rubs that way more than the opposite... source by people who know next to nothing about photography to make "authoritative" statements on here about equipment they haven't ever used, for example ... My statements regarding noise and the 4/3 system are clearly in regard to future higher density models with the small sensor size. But Tony Polson is a great expert at quoting out of context, selective snipping and plain old sniping at those who disagree with him. Or who have caught him in one of his numerous truth bending episodes: -Paris Match cover from the 1970's. Show it Polson. -.E-1 with 8 Mpixel sensor (BWAAHAHA) .Consumer version of E-1 with 5 Mpix. (Bwahahha) .ordered an "E-2" (Bwaahahsh). -Generalities on aperture size and sharpness -50 rolls of film per average *week* -Says Nat Geo Field Guide is greatest thing since sliced bread (In "gushing" terms, pathetic really) -Then says it sucks ... which is it Polson? ... etc. ... Tony Polson: it is long past time for you to post proof that you have any talent approaching your claims. Cheers, Alan. Ahhh, Feel better now? -- Douglas... It's traditional, painter's use it, Rembrandt used it. Now you can put your photos on it too! http://www.canvasphotos.com.au |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice Pentax *istD shot | m II | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | April 21st 05 12:46 AM |
Distance to take macro shot with C-3020 & E-300 | paul | Digital Photography | 0 | January 11th 05 10:39 PM |
WEEKLY PHOTO CONTEST - rules | Deathwalker | Other Photographic Equipment | 0 | November 6th 03 12:45 PM |
WEEKLY PHOTO CONTEST - info here | Deathwalker | APS Photographic Equipment | 0 | November 6th 03 12:41 PM |
WEEKLY PHOTO CONTEST - information | Deathwalker | Film & Labs | 0 | November 6th 03 12:40 PM |