|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 24th 08, 01:45 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
ransley wrote:
On Jul 22, 8:30 pm, Rich wrote: Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2 lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom range and a larger sensor. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs They have been making P&S that are not crap for years, it the photographer that matters. The theory is that a good photographer can make good pictures, even with lousy equipment, but a lousy photographer can make lousy pictures, even with great equipment. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? | ray | Digital Photography | 15 | August 7th 08 05:25 AM |
| First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? | Don Wiss | Digital Photography | 1 | July 24th 08 12:58 PM |
| First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? | Russell D. | Digital Photography | 8 | July 24th 08 12:54 PM |
| First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? | /dev/null/ | Digital Photography | 1 | July 23rd 08 12:56 PM |
| First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? | 2SQUID | Digital Photography | 2 | July 23rd 08 12:46 PM |
Linear Mode
