A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VC with color head - max magenta



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 7th 04, 07:55 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default VC with color head - max magenta

I'm thinking of trying out an Omega color head with VC papers. Max magenta
is #130, while others like the Durst have #170. The question is: are these
numbers absolute or somewhat arbitrary? In other words, is the Omega 130
truly less magenta than a Durst 170?


  #2  
Old September 7th 04, 11:48 AM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It may be hard for people to answer since they are supposed to
be kissing your "Jobo".


In article ,
"jjs" wrote:

I'm thinking of trying out an Omega color head with VC papers. Max magenta
is #130, while others like the Durst have #170. The question is: are these
numbers absolute or somewhat arbitrary? In other words, is the Omega 130
truly less magenta than a Durst 170?


--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #3  
Old September 7th 04, 11:48 AM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It may be hard for people to answer since they are supposed to
be kissing your "Jobo".


In article ,
"jjs" wrote:

I'm thinking of trying out an Omega color head with VC papers. Max magenta
is #130, while others like the Durst have #170. The question is: are these
numbers absolute or somewhat arbitrary? In other words, is the Omega 130
truly less magenta than a Durst 170?


--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #4  
Old September 7th 04, 12:20 PM
Stefano Bramato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm thinking of trying out an Omega color head with VC papers. Max magenta
is #130, while others like the Durst have #170. The question is: are these
numbers absolute or somewhat arbitrary? In other words, is the Omega 130
truly less magenta than a Durst 170?





My Durst m605 has maximum magenta of 130.
I think is the same.

ciao
--
Non è bello cio che è bello figuriamoci cio che è brutto!
  #5  
Old September 7th 04, 12:20 PM
Stefano Bramato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm thinking of trying out an Omega color head with VC papers. Max magenta
is #130, while others like the Durst have #170. The question is: are these
numbers absolute or somewhat arbitrary? In other words, is the Omega 130
truly less magenta than a Durst 170?





My Durst m605 has maximum magenta of 130.
I think is the same.

ciao
--
Non è bello cio che è bello figuriamoci cio che è brutto!
  #6  
Old September 7th 04, 12:20 PM
Stefano Bramato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm thinking of trying out an Omega color head with VC papers. Max magenta
is #130, while others like the Durst have #170. The question is: are these
numbers absolute or somewhat arbitrary? In other words, is the Omega 130
truly less magenta than a Durst 170?





My Durst m605 has maximum magenta of 130.
I think is the same.

ciao
--
Non è bello cio che è bello figuriamoci cio che è brutto!
  #7  
Old September 7th 04, 03:12 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gregory Blank" wrote in message
...
It may be hard for people to answer since they are supposed to
be kissing your "Jobo".


Kiss my D76. (Has a nice ring, eh?)


  #8  
Old September 7th 04, 03:12 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gregory Blank" wrote in message
...
It may be hard for people to answer since they are supposed to
be kissing your "Jobo".


Kiss my D76. (Has a nice ring, eh?)


  #9  
Old September 7th 04, 03:12 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gregory Blank" wrote in message
...
It may be hard for people to answer since they are supposed to
be kissing your "Jobo".


Kiss my D76. (Has a nice ring, eh?)


  #10  
Old September 7th 04, 04:15 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gregory Blank" wrote in message
...

It may be hard for people to answer since they are supposed to
be kissing your "Jobo".


You don't know the answer, do you.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.