If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
R.Schenck wrote:
I seriously resent you linking to a site with pop-ups. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Hickey wrote: "R.Schenck" wrote in message ... I exposed at 400 speed http://photobucket.com/albums/y13/Nygdan/Boston%20BnW/? This one seems like perhaps it could'vebeen sharper, to have more detail on what I think is a filled in doorway. http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13...oll1DX-04A.jpg I rather like this one, I didn't realize that it was a bit over exposed when I had first gotten the print, but now that i've had at least some experience with this sort of thing its rather obvious http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13...oll1DX-02A.jpg Should this t-x 400 be exposed at some other speed perhaps, 400 is the usual no? Any criticisms of the photos would be appreciated from either group To me, they look like the paper grade is too high, or they've been overdeveloped a little. Labs usually go with a lot more contrast than I do, but that's the opinion of the wolds worst scanner. That would be me. I usually expose Tri-X @ 200, D76 1:1 is a very easy to use developer, although I like Rodinal when I can get it. It's necessary to find your own standard everything. Don't be afraid to bracket a few shots and bracket developement. The results will pay off in the future. I find that way too much contrast makes better scans, but I develop for prints, so there's the tradeoff. Bob Hickey I was just wondering how you bracket development, presuming you mean per frame, if you mean the whole roll, forgive me for asking |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
geletine wrote: Bob Hickey wrote: "R.Schenck" wrote in message ... I exposed at 400 speed http://photobucket.com/albums/y13/Nygdan/Boston%20BnW/? This one seems like perhaps it could'vebeen sharper, to have more detail on what I think is a filled in doorway. http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13...oll1DX-04A.jpg I rather like this one, I didn't realize that it was a bit over exposed when I had first gotten the print, but now that i've had at least some experience with this sort of thing its rather obvious http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13...oll1DX-02A.jpg Should this t-x 400 be exposed at some other speed perhaps, 400 is the usual no? Any criticisms of the photos would be appreciated from either group To me, they look like the paper grade is too high, or they've been overdeveloped a little. Labs usually go with a lot more contrast than I do, but that's the opinion of the wolds worst scanner. That would be me. I usually expose Tri-X @ 200, D76 1:1 is a very easy to use developer, although I like Rodinal when I can get it. It's necessary to find your own standard everything. Don't be afraid to bracket a few shots and bracket developement. The results will pay off in the future. I find that way too much contrast makes better scans, but I develop for prints, so there's the tradeoff. Bob Hickey I was just wondering how you bracket development, presuming you mean per frame, if you mean the whole roll, forgive me for asking I would like to add, I am talking about roll film, not large format sheet film |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"geletine" wrote in message oups.com... I was just wondering how you bracket development, presuming you mean per frame, if you mean the whole roll, forgive me for asking Just shoot about 6 or 8 frames, a few blanks. 6 or 8 more, etc, then cut them into 3 lengths. Look up the times on the Massive Developement chart; then Bracket. If they recommend 10 mins, try 8, 10, and 12. When I wrote that, I didn't know you were sending them out. Bob Hickey |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Browne on 07 Mar 2005 posted
R.Schenck wrote: I seriously resent you linking to a site with pop-ups. Does it have pop-ups? Man, that /is/ annoying. I'm not sure if I like the photobucket site, but there don't seem to be any free sites that are much better, and I'm not going to spend for a pay site. No, I'm not cheap, I'm 'thrifty'. Ok I'm cheap. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tri-x 400 examples | R.Schenck | 35mm Photo Equipment | 14 | March 13th 05 11:01 PM |
8Mp Digital The Theoretical 35mm Quality Equivelant | Matt | Digital Photography | 1144 | December 17th 04 09:48 PM |
8Mp Digital The Theoretical 35mm Quality Equivelant | Matt | 35mm Photo Equipment | 932 | December 17th 04 09:48 PM |
Sigma SD9, 10 | Robert | Digital Photography | 166 | November 25th 04 03:01 AM |
New examples of photo paranoļa | Mxsmanic | Photographing People | 1 | February 8th 04 02:20 PM |