If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
street shooter wrote:
So what would your ideal camera be? My Maxxum 9 with a 15 MP (or so) full frame digital back with a wireless transmitter that slowly but surely sends all the images to a storage device in my camera bag . This of course would allow film use as well. I've been renting a 500CM with back and lenses for a couple weekends. The simplicity of this style of shooting is great. I use my incident meter for most shots, and use my Maxxum 9 as a spot meter where needed*... this setup with film and digital backs (for both cameras) would be fantastic. Cheers, Alan -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Duncan J Murray" wrote in message ... As film's basically on the way out, a new film format with the same range as the current 35mm I think is highly unlikely. Yeah I know - no harm in dreaming though. If APS had a frame size the same or bigger than 35mm, it probably would have taken off. What form-factor would your camera be? I was thinking Super-A, or ME-Super size - so compact (comparable to a Leica rangefinder). I like the size of the small pentax's - mz50, mz60 etc Pentax lenses certainly! Only because I have them, of course. Other than the hiccup with the new bodies that have no aperture coupling, I think Pentax have achieved the best compatibility between new and old lenses and cameras of any of the majors. The glass quality is good and the range is also very good, including a wide range of 3rd party lenses. Unfortunately they may be getting left a little behind now due to the lack of image stabilisation - I don't know if IS would be possible with K-Mount. Duncan. P.S. Maybe there's a market? Of course there's a market - at the moment though I think it consists of only you and I, so by the time cost for R&D and tooling is spread across the 2 cameras, our cameras are gonna be bloody expensive Actually, I thought of a couple of additions to the perfect camera. Replaceable viewscreens, but standard with a split prism focus aid. In-viewfinder information of shutter/aperture/mode etc. At least 2 presettable viewfinder dioptres so a couple of people can use the camera and have it automatically set to their preference, or I could use it with and without contacts without having to manually adjust it. DOF Preview. Inbuilt viewfinder cover (The Olympus E1 has this - very handy as I keep losing the covers). Multiple exposure. TTL flash metering. Uhm.... I'm sure there's still more. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:34:19 -0700, street shooter had this to say:
So what would your ideal camera be? Something by Nikon that sends out an electromagnetic pulse to disable all other cameras in a 1km radius. It will get the only shots everytime and have most Canon users completely buggered since they wouldn't be able to use anything manual. -- DD™ "And that's all I got to say about that" ~ FG |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Martin Francis" wrote in message
... "street shooter" wrote in message m... So what would your ideal camera be? Michael Black titanium FM3a with Leica R mount and optional spot metering, quieter shutter and faster sync. For 120 format, I can't think of anything i'd need that Hasselblad doesn't already do... Ergonomics? ;-) Peter |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Martin Francis" wrote in message
... "street shooter" wrote in message m... So what would your ideal camera be? Michael Black titanium FM3a with Leica R mount and optional spot metering, quieter shutter and faster sync. For 120 format, I can't think of anything i'd need that Hasselblad doesn't already do... Ergonomics? ;-) Peter |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Bandicoot" wrote:
"Martin Francis" wrote: For 120 format, I can't think of anything i'd need that Hasselblad doesn't already do... Ergonomics? ;-) One day, Sony will introduce a robot that is perfectly designed to operate a Hasselblad 6x6 SLR. Until then, we imperfect humans will have to continue handling them as best we can. ;-) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Bandicoot" wrote:
"Martin Francis" wrote: For 120 format, I can't think of anything i'd need that Hasselblad doesn't already do... Ergonomics? ;-) One day, Sony will introduce a robot that is perfectly designed to operate a Hasselblad 6x6 SLR. Until then, we imperfect humans will have to continue handling them as best we can. ;-) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"TP" wrote in message ... "Bandicoot" wrote: "Martin Francis" wrote: For 120 format, I can't think of anything i'd need that Hasselblad doesn't already do... Ergonomics? ;-) One day, Sony will introduce a robot that is perfectly designed to operate a Hasselblad 6x6 SLR. It will, of course, have three hands...... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"TP" wrote in message ... "Bandicoot" wrote: "Martin Francis" wrote: For 120 format, I can't think of anything i'd need that Hasselblad doesn't already do... Ergonomics? ;-) One day, Sony will introduce a robot that is perfectly designed to operate a Hasselblad 6x6 SLR. It will, of course, have three hands...... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"William Graham" wrote:
One day, Sony will introduce a robot that is perfectly designed to operate a Hasselblad 6x6 SLR. It will, of course, have three hands...... Only three? Wow! Some robot! ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Neat Items for a Camera Bag... | Thom Tapp | Digital Photography | 3 | September 7th 04 06:28 PM |
Another nail in the view camera coffin? | Robert Feinman | Large Format Photography Equipment | 108 | August 4th 04 03:37 PM |
Batteries for Kodak DX3600 Camera Dock | Larry R Harrison Jr | Digital Photography | 10 | July 24th 04 05:49 PM |
What's your digital camera history? | David Dyer-Bennet | Digital Photography | 67 | July 3rd 04 10:56 AM |