A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bulk-loaded film: frame numbering



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 26th 04, 08:38 PM
Dallas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bulk-loaded film: frame numbering

I just got back a roll of Provia 100 that was given to me by the dude who
sold me the Nikon F4s. The film results are excellent, but I noticed
something odd: the frame numbers are all out of synch.

My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they
revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again.

Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before
exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? If the
former is the case, I can understand the numbers not running from #1 to
whatever I ended on, but if not, how did they get messed up?

Would the fact that I am using the Nikon MF-23 back on the F4s have
anything to do with this? I did set it to imprint shooting data between
the frames, but I think I set the imprint function too low because it's
barely visible - almost microscopic!

--
Dallas www.dallasdahms.com

"You know you're right! You're bloody well right!
You've bloody got a right to say!" ~ Supertramp

  #2  
Old September 26th 04, 10:10 PM
Dominic Richens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dallas wrote:

My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter
they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again.

Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before
exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing?


Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10
exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the
highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was enough
to identify roll#/frame#
--
Dominic Richens |
"If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!"


  #3  
Old September 26th 04, 10:10 PM
Dominic Richens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dallas wrote:

My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter
they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again.

Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before
exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing?


Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10
exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the
highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was enough
to identify roll#/frame#
--
Dominic Richens |
"If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!"


  #4  
Old September 26th 04, 10:10 PM
Dominic Richens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dallas wrote:

My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter
they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again.

Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before
exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing?


Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10
exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the
highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was enough
to identify roll#/frame#
--
Dominic Richens |
"If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!"


  #5  
Old September 27th 04, 06:11 AM
David Dyer-Bennet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dallas writes:

I just got back a roll of Provia 100 that was given to me by the dude who
sold me the Nikon F4s. The film results are excellent, but I noticed
something odd: the frame numbers are all out of synch.

My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they
revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again.

Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before
exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? If the
former is the case, I can understand the numbers not running from #1 to
whatever I ended on, but if not, how did they get messed up?


The numbers and film type information is printed onto the film during
manufacturing. If, as your subject line suggests, this was a
bulk-loaded roll (spooled off a 100-foot roll into the cassette), then
it's completely normal for the numbering to be wonky, starting at some
random place in the middle, running up to something like 42, and then
going back to zero and starting up again. I've got hundreds of rolls
like that in my files.

Would the fact that I am using the Nikon MF-23 back on the F4s have
anything to do with this? I did set it to imprint shooting data between
the frames, but I think I set the imprint function too low because it's
barely visible - almost microscopic!


Nope.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/
RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/
Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/
Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/
  #6  
Old September 27th 04, 06:11 AM
David Dyer-Bennet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dallas writes:

I just got back a roll of Provia 100 that was given to me by the dude who
sold me the Nikon F4s. The film results are excellent, but I noticed
something odd: the frame numbers are all out of synch.

My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they
revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again.

Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before
exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? If the
former is the case, I can understand the numbers not running from #1 to
whatever I ended on, but if not, how did they get messed up?


The numbers and film type information is printed onto the film during
manufacturing. If, as your subject line suggests, this was a
bulk-loaded roll (spooled off a 100-foot roll into the cassette), then
it's completely normal for the numbering to be wonky, starting at some
random place in the middle, running up to something like 42, and then
going back to zero and starting up again. I've got hundreds of rolls
like that in my files.

Would the fact that I am using the Nikon MF-23 back on the F4s have
anything to do with this? I did set it to imprint shooting data between
the frames, but I think I set the imprint function too low because it's
barely visible - almost microscopic!


Nope.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/
RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/
Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/
Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/
  #7  
Old September 27th 04, 07:43 PM
Dallas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:10:39 -0400, Dominic Richens wrote:

Dallas wrote:

My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they
revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again.

Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before
exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing?


Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10
exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the
highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was
enough to identify roll#/frame#


Thanks Dominic & David.

It makes sense to me now. I have quite a lot of bulk loaded film in the
fridge plus the guy I bought the camera from gave me his bulk loader too,
so if I ever have to, I can load in bulk too. The thing that scares me is
ruining a bulk roll of film! Fortunately my lab also sells their own bulk
loaded Velvia (50 & 100) and Provia, so at least I can let them take the
risk for now - they seem to be pretty reasonably priced.

--
Dallas www.dallasdahms.com

"You know you're right! You're bloody well right!
You've bloody got a right to say!" ~ Supertramp

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bulk film loaders Tina In The Darkroom 40 September 3rd 04 10:05 PM
Bulk film loaders Geoffrey S. Mendelson In The Darkroom 25 September 3rd 04 03:17 PM
Help: Newbie 35mm Film Question Keith 35mm Photo Equipment 6 July 14th 04 06:26 PM
Road ruts with Jobo Brian Kosoff In The Darkroom 64 January 27th 04 12:08 AM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.