If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bulk-loaded film: frame numbering
I just got back a roll of Provia 100 that was given to me by the dude who
sold me the Nikon F4s. The film results are excellent, but I noticed something odd: the frame numbers are all out of synch. My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again. Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? If the former is the case, I can understand the numbers not running from #1 to whatever I ended on, but if not, how did they get messed up? Would the fact that I am using the Nikon MF-23 back on the F4s have anything to do with this? I did set it to imprint shooting data between the frames, but I think I set the imprint function too low because it's barely visible - almost microscopic! -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "You know you're right! You're bloody well right! You've bloody got a right to say!" ~ Supertramp |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas wrote:
My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again. Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10 exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was enough to identify roll#/frame# -- Dominic Richens | "If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas wrote:
My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again. Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10 exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was enough to identify roll#/frame# -- Dominic Richens | "If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas wrote:
My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again. Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10 exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was enough to identify roll#/frame# -- Dominic Richens | "If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas writes:
I just got back a roll of Provia 100 that was given to me by the dude who sold me the Nikon F4s. The film results are excellent, but I noticed something odd: the frame numbers are all out of synch. My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again. Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? If the former is the case, I can understand the numbers not running from #1 to whatever I ended on, but if not, how did they get messed up? The numbers and film type information is printed onto the film during manufacturing. If, as your subject line suggests, this was a bulk-loaded roll (spooled off a 100-foot roll into the cassette), then it's completely normal for the numbering to be wonky, starting at some random place in the middle, running up to something like 42, and then going back to zero and starting up again. I've got hundreds of rolls like that in my files. Would the fact that I am using the Nikon MF-23 back on the F4s have anything to do with this? I did set it to imprint shooting data between the frames, but I think I set the imprint function too low because it's barely visible - almost microscopic! Nope. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas writes:
I just got back a roll of Provia 100 that was given to me by the dude who sold me the Nikon F4s. The film results are excellent, but I noticed something odd: the frame numbers are all out of synch. My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again. Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? If the former is the case, I can understand the numbers not running from #1 to whatever I ended on, but if not, how did they get messed up? The numbers and film type information is printed onto the film during manufacturing. If, as your subject line suggests, this was a bulk-loaded roll (spooled off a 100-foot roll into the cassette), then it's completely normal for the numbering to be wonky, starting at some random place in the middle, running up to something like 42, and then going back to zero and starting up again. I've got hundreds of rolls like that in my files. Would the fact that I am using the Nikon MF-23 back on the F4s have anything to do with this? I did set it to imprint shooting data between the frames, but I think I set the imprint function too low because it's barely visible - almost microscopic! Nope. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:10:39 -0400, Dominic Richens wrote:
Dallas wrote: My frames begin at #27 and increase up until about #43, whereafter they revert to #1 and increase up to #13 again. Where do these numbers come from? Are they already on the film before exposure, or are they printed onto the film during processing? Yes, the former. When I did the zone system properly, I used to roll 10 exposure rolls from my bulk film loader so that I could develop for the highlights. The numbers on the negs never made any sense, but it was enough to identify roll#/frame# Thanks Dominic & David. It makes sense to me now. I have quite a lot of bulk loaded film in the fridge plus the guy I bought the camera from gave me his bulk loader too, so if I ever have to, I can load in bulk too. The thing that scares me is ruining a bulk roll of film! Fortunately my lab also sells their own bulk loaded Velvia (50 & 100) and Provia, so at least I can let them take the risk for now - they seem to be pretty reasonably priced. -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "You know you're right! You're bloody well right! You've bloody got a right to say!" ~ Supertramp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bulk film loaders | Tina | In The Darkroom | 40 | September 3rd 04 10:05 PM |
Bulk film loaders | Geoffrey S. Mendelson | In The Darkroom | 25 | September 3rd 04 03:17 PM |
Help: Newbie 35mm Film Question | Keith | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | July 14th 04 06:26 PM |
Road ruts with Jobo | Brian Kosoff | In The Darkroom | 64 | January 27th 04 12:08 AM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |