If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
George Emory Hale, who
designed it, and the 100 inch at Mt. Wilson, never lived to see it completed. I don't think that right. Story goes that he was the first to look through the 200. There were so many stars he, though the telescope was pointed directly into the milkyway. Larry |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
George Emory Hale, who
designed it, and the 100 inch at Mt. Wilson, never lived to see it completed. I don't think that right. Story goes that he was the first to look through the 200. There were so many stars he, though the telescope was pointed directly into the milkyway. Larry |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Hemi4268" wrote in message ... George Emory Hale, who designed it, and the 100 inch at Mt. Wilson, never lived to see it completed. I don't think that right. Story goes that he was the first to look through the 200. There were so many stars he, though the telescope was pointed directly into the milkyway. Larry George Ellery Hale (I got the name wrong in my previous post, I have a friend at work named Emory) died in 1938 and the 200" wasn't completed until 1949. There are other telescopes at Palomar so he may have been the first to look through one of those. He was certainly alive when the 100" telescope was completed. It would be interesting to know how many people have actually looked directly through the 200" telescope since it is never used for visual observation. I am not sure it even has means for visual observation. These two telescopes are remarkable achievments and no fooling. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Hemi4268" wrote in message ... George Emory Hale, who designed it, and the 100 inch at Mt. Wilson, never lived to see it completed. I don't think that right. Story goes that he was the first to look through the 200. There were so many stars he, though the telescope was pointed directly into the milkyway. Larry George Ellery Hale (I got the name wrong in my previous post, I have a friend at work named Emory) died in 1938 and the 200" wasn't completed until 1949. There are other telescopes at Palomar so he may have been the first to look through one of those. He was certainly alive when the 100" telescope was completed. It would be interesting to know how many people have actually looked directly through the 200" telescope since it is never used for visual observation. I am not sure it even has means for visual observation. These two telescopes are remarkable achievments and no fooling. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
He was certainly alive when the 100"
telescope was completed. And the story might be with the 100 incher now that I think about it. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Knoppow" wrote:
George Ellery Hale (I got the name wrong in my previous post, I have a friend at work named Emory) died in 1938 and the 200" wasn't completed until 1949. There are other telescopes at Palomar so he may have been the first to look through one of those. He was certainly alive when the 100" telescope was completed. It would be interesting to know how many people have actually looked directly through the 200" telescope since it is never used for visual observation. I am not sure it even has means for visual observation. These two telescopes are remarkable achievments and no fooling. In the Bad Old Days, when the astronomer had to ride around in the prime focus cage or stand out on the dome floor, he[*] would guide the telescope during an exposure, by looking through an eyepiece with crosshairs at a star field adjacent to whatever was being observed, and using a hand paddle to make minute adjustments to the telescope position. (Telescopes track to follow the apparent rotation of the sky, but do not guide well enough on their own to preserve sub-arcsecond precision through a long exposure.) So in that sense, many people have looked through the telescope, although a guider eyepiece is probably not the best view aesthetically. There is an anecdote in Richard Preston's "First Light" about an astronomer pointing the telescope at Venus and finding the eyepiece image nearly blinding. These days, the astronomer sits at a computer in a lighted control room and guiding is done automatically with a TV camera and software that controls the telescope. Less romantic, but you can go to the bathroom during the night. [*] "He" - In one of the more shameful episodes in the history of astronomy, women were not officially allowed to observe at Mount Wilson or Palomar until the mid-1960s (!) when some younger scientists forced the issue. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
"Benjamin Weiner" wrote in message
om... [*] "He" - In one of the more shameful episodes in the history of astronomy, women were not officially allowed to observe at Mount Wilson or Palomar until the mid-1960s (!) when some younger scientists forced the issue. Wonder if there was ever a Sophie Germaine equivalent...? Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
16.5" Red Dot Artar Coverage? | Victor Loverro | Large Format Photography Equipment | 2 | June 18th 04 10:49 PM |
Wanted: Schneider lens cap 58mm | Alistair Calder | Large Format Photography Equipment | 5 | May 14th 04 11:33 PM |
135 mm or 150 mm Schneider enlarging lens 4 x5 ? | EXPRODUCER | Large Format Photography Equipment | 7 | May 8th 04 05:01 AM |
Schneider 90 & 75 question | Kerry L. Thalmann | Large Format Photography Equipment | 0 | April 19th 04 08:33 PM |
Schneider Kreuznach lenses also labeled "Sinar" | cor | Large Format Photography Equipment | 11 | January 21st 04 05:49 PM |