If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
I don't think I'll buy it, but this camera is quite affordable
(and compact) considering it's a 100MP medium format camera: https://petapixel.com/2021/01/27/fuj...ls-the-medium- format-gfx100s-102mp-5-axis-ibis-6000/ And it comes with IBIS. It's even cheaper than the 50MP Sony A1, although of course you can't compare these two cameras. -- Alfred Molon Olympus 4/3 and micro 4/3 cameras forum at https://groups.io/g/myolympus https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
On 1/27/2021 12:10 PM, Alfred Molon wrote:
I don't think I'll buy it, but this camera is quite affordable (and compact) considering it's a 100MP medium format camera: https://petapixel.com/2021/01/27/fuj...ls-the-medium- format-gfx100s-102mp-5-axis-ibis-6000/ And it comes with IBIS. It's even cheaper than the 50MP Sony A1, although of course you can't compare these two cameras. I wonder what they mean by "medium format" and "medium format video"? -- best regards, Neil |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
In article , Neil
wrote: I don't think I'll buy it, but this camera is quite affordable (and compact) considering it's a 100MP medium format camera: https://petapixel.com/2021/01/27/fuj...ls-the-medium- format-gfx100s-102mp-5-axis-ibis-6000/ And it comes with IBIS. It's even cheaper than the 50MP Sony A1, although of course you can't compare these two cameras. I wonder what they mean by "medium format" and "medium format video"? you've never heard the term medium format before?? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
On 1/27/21 10:03 PM, Neil wrote:
On 1/27/2021 12:10 PM, Alfred Molon wrote: I don't think I'll buy it, but this camera is quite affordable (and compact) considering it's a 100MP medium format camera: https://petapixel.com/2021/01/27/fuj...ls-the-medium- format-gfx100s-102mp-5-axis-ibis-6000/ And it comes with IBIS. It's even cheaper than the 50MP Sony A1, although of course you can't compare these two cameras. I wonder what they mean by "medium format" and "medium format video"? In the film days, medium format was a 2.25" or 6cm wide negative. Common sizes (at least common for me!) were 645 (6cm by 4.5cm), 6x6cm, 6x7cm, and 6x9cm. The film would have been 120 or 220 size. Both are the same width, but 220 film is twice as long as 120 for twice as many exposures. -- Ken Hart |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
On 1/27/2021 11:39 PM, Ken Hart wrote:
On 1/27/21 10:03 PM, Neil wrote: On 1/27/2021 12:10 PM, Alfred Molon wrote: I don't think I'll buy it, but this camera is quite affordable (and compact) considering it's a 100MP medium format camera: https://petapixel.com/2021/01/27/fuj...ls-the-medium- format-gfx100s-102mp-5-axis-ibis-6000/ And it comes with IBIS. It's even cheaper than the 50MP Sony A1, although of course you can't compare these two cameras. I wonder what they mean by "medium format" and "medium format video"? In the film days, medium format was a 2.25" or 6cm wide negative. Common sizes (at least common for me!) were 645 (6cm by 4.5cm), 6x6cm, 6x7cm, and 6x9cm. The film would have been 120 or 220 size. Both are the same width, but 220 film is twice as long as 120 for twice as many exposures. Yes, I have a considerable amount of medium format film equipment, and know what it refers to. I just don't see an analogy with this camera beyond the aspect ratio of its screen. I doubt that the sensor is 6x6cm or larger, and the 102mp resolution is well below that of MF film. -- best regards, Neil |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
On 28 Jan 2021 in rec.photo.digital, Neil wrote:
I doubt that the sensor is 6x6cm or larger, and the 102mp resolution is well below that of MF film. Image sensor 43.8mm×32.9mm Bayer array with primary color filter Number of recorded pixels 4:3 11648×8736 [max listed pixel dimensions] From the manufacturer's specs page: https://fujifilm-x.com/global/produc...pecifications/ By way of comparison, Hasselblad H6D-100c (US$33,000): Sensor dimensions 53.4 x 40.0mm Pixel dimension: 23200 x 17400 (taken from sample image; spec sheet doesn't list) https://cdn.hasselblad.com/0d402917-...heet_en_v5.pdf -- Joe Makowiec http://makowiec.org/ Email: http://makowiec.org/contact/?Joe Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
In article 2, Joe
Makowiec wrote: I doubt that the sensor is 6x6cm or larger, and the 102mp resolution is well below that of MF film. Image sensor 43.8mm×32.9mm Bayer array with primary color filter Number of recorded pixels 4:3 11648×8736 [max listed pixel dimensions] it's the same sensor size as the pentax 645d, one of the first medium format digital cameras. https://www.dpreview.com/products/pe.../specification s Medium format (44 x 33 mm) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
On 1/28/2021 8:17 AM, Joe Makowiec wrote:
On 28 Jan 2021 in rec.photo.digital, Neil wrote: I doubt that the sensor is 6x6cm or larger, and the 102mp resolution is well below that of MF film. Image sensor 43.8mm×32.9mm Bayer array with primary color filter Number of recorded pixels 4:3 11648×8736 [max listed pixel dimensions] From the manufacturer's specs page: https://fujifilm-x.com/global/produc...pecifications/ By way of comparison, Hasselblad H6D-100c (US$33,000): Sensor dimensions 53.4 x 40.0mm Pixel dimension: 23200 x 17400 (taken from sample image; spec sheet doesn't list) https://cdn.hasselblad.com/0d402917-...heet_en_v5.pdf This basicaly states that, the sensor sizes of the two are below the size of MF film and the resolution is far below even consumer-level scanned MF film (4000dpi 6x6 = 144000mp; 5000dpi 6x6 = 180000mp). Again, they seem to be addressing the aspect ratio of the sensor. No big deal, and ergo no valid analogy. -- best regards, Neil |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
In article , Neil
wrote: https://petapixel.com/2021/01/27/fuj...ls-the-medium- format-gfx100s-102mp-5-axis-ibis-6000/ And it comes with IBIS. It's even cheaper than the 50MP Sony A1, although of course you can't compare these two cameras. I wonder what they mean by "medium format" and "medium format video"? In the film days, medium format was a 2.25" or 6cm wide negative. Common sizes (at least common for me!) were 645 (6cm by 4.5cm), 6x6cm, 6x7cm, and 6x9cm. The film would have been 120 or 220 size. Both are the same width, but 220 film is twice as long as 120 for twice as many exposures. Yes, I have a considerable amount of medium format film equipment, and know what it refers to. I just don't see an analogy with this camera beyond the aspect ratio of its screen. I doubt that the sensor is 6x6cm or larger, nobody said it was the same size as mf film. nikon dx and canon ef-s cameras are not the same size as 35mm film either. its sensor is the same size as other medium format digital cameras, such as the pentax 645d, which was released a decade ago. and the 102mp resolution is well below that of MF film. nonsense. 35mm size slrs have matched or exceeded mf film and this should be capable of even better results. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
(Relatively) affordable, compact medium format 100MP camera
On Jan 28, 2021, nospam wrote
(in ) : In , wrote: https://petapixel.com/2021/01/27/fuj...ls-the-medium- format-gfx100s-102mp-5-axis-ibis-6000/ And it comes with IBIS. It's even cheaper than the 50MP Sony A1, although of course you can't compare these two cameras. I wonder what they mean by "medium format" and "medium format video"? In the film days, medium format was a 2.25" or 6cm wide negative. Common sizes (at least common for me!) were 645 (6cm by 4.5cm), 6x6cm, 6x7cm, and 6x9cm. The film would have been 120 or 220 size. Both are the same width, but 220 film is twice as long as 120 for twice as many exposures. Yes, I have a considerable amount of medium format film equipment, and know what it refers to. I just don't see an analogy with this camera beyond the aspect ratio of its screen. I doubt that the sensor is 6x6cm or larger, nobody said it was the same size as mf film. nikon dx and canon ef-s cameras are not the same size as 35mm film either. its sensor is the same size as other medium format digital cameras, such as the pentax 645d, which was released a decade ago. and the 102mp resolution is well below that of MF film. nonsense. 35mm size slrs have matched or exceeded mf film and this should be capable of even better results. It is. -- Regards, Savageduck |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
100mp medium format digitals. High priced real, or just priced for the bracket? | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 5 | April 14th 20 12:31 AM |
I LOVE how Fuji's 100mp medium format raises the fur on FF'rs necks | FlipChip(TM) | Digital Photography | 0 | May 27th 19 07:22 AM |
I LOVE how Fuji's 100mp medium format raises the fur on FF'rs necks | FlipChip(TM) | Digital Photography | 0 | May 25th 19 01:50 PM |
Phase launches 100mp med. format camera, morons comment on it | Sandman | Digital Photography | 10 | January 5th 16 03:20 PM |
Phase launches 100mp med. format camera, morons comment on it | android | Digital Photography | 0 | January 4th 16 05:24 PM |