A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More pixels for Nikon's APS-C?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 7th 09, 01:54 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Fotoguy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default More pixels for Nikon's APS-C?

On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:42:52 -0700, R Halim wrote:

Interesting developments in 2009. Canon DSLR APS-C models have been
inching up from 10 MP in Canon 40D, 15 MP in Canon 50D and Tii, and now
the newly announced Canon 7D with 18 MP. Rival cameras appears to go on
the same direction. Sony came up with 14 MP in their A380 and A550
series. Pentax with 14.5 MP K-7. At the same time, in March 2009,
Olympus Exec indicated that 12 MP would be enough for digital camera. In
contrast, Nikon appears to lag behind in inching up their camera's
pixels. Nikon D3000 is still 10MP. Their D300s and D5000 models are only
12MP. Will they follow Canon's path? Or, will they insist that for an
APS-C camera, there is no need to go more than 12 MP? Thanks for the
discussion


More megapixels doesn't necessarily mean better images.

Many are of the opinion, and there is evidence to verify it, that for
sensor densities above about 3.5 million photosites per square
centimeter, noise becomes an exponentially increasing problem--increasing
faster than image quality is improved--requiring more aggressive noise
reduction to "clean" the image that by its very nature destroys fine
image detail, thereby reducing overall image quality. A major Catch 22
situation. For an APS-C size sensor, this density "sweet spot" equates
to around 12 megapixels.

Of course, noise is only one of many factors that affect digital image
quality, and it doesn't mean that this inherent electronics problem won't
successfully be overcome, but for now, it exists.

FWIW, Nikon has always been very conservative in its technological
development. I don't think Canon's (or anyone else's) product releases
or camera/lens specs affect Nikon all that much. Look at the history.
What's that old TV commercial tag line? "We will sell no wine before its
time." That's been Nikon's basic business philosophy since they began
making cameras and lenses.


--
Fotoguy
BestInClass.com
"Personalized digital camera recommendations"
http://www.bestinclass.com/digital-cameras
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More pixels for Nikon's APS-C? David J Taylor[_11_] Digital Photography 3 September 6th 09 11:09 PM
Can hot pixels become dead pixels? kl_tom Digital Photography 4 October 5th 06 07:52 PM
Nikon's new 200/2 IS! RichA Digital SLR Cameras 1 July 16th 05 02:17 PM
Nikon's new D70S [email protected] Digital Photography 0 April 21st 05 04:43 PM
Nikon's red markings RichA Digital SLR Cameras 23 April 18th 05 12:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.