61MP Sony

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-alpha-a7r-iv---
world-s-first-61mp-full-frame-camera-33789

The interesting thing is that pixel size is approaching
m4/3 levels, yet Sony declare 15 stops of dynamic range
with this new sensor.

--
Alfred Molon

Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
https://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site

In article ,
Alfred Molon wrote:

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-alpha-a7r-iv---
world-s-first-61mp-full-frame-camera-33789

The interesting thing is that pixel size is approaching
m4/3 levels, yet Sony declare 15 stops of dynamic range
with this new sensor.

Alfred-

That is a rather extensive article. I may have missed it, but I
couldn't find whether the new body is compatible with my old
Sony/Minolta lenses.

Fred

In article -75-242-
165.myvzw.com, says...
That is a rather extensive article. I may have missed it, but I
couldn't find whether the new body is compatible with my old
Sony/Minolta lenses.

Should work with an adapter, for instance the Sony LA-
EA3. The other question is if your old lenses are sharp
enough for a 61MP sensor.

--
Alfred Molon

Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
https://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site

In article , Incubus
wrote:


I shoot Real Raw (TM).

https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/real-raw.htm

do not believe anything kenny says. his site is a work of fiction, by
his own admission.

that link in particular is overflowing with bull****, so much so that
it that it can *only* be considered satire.

On Jul 16, 2019, Alfred Molon wrote
(in . com):

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/s...e-camera-33789

The interesting thing is that pixel size is approaching
m4/3 levels, yet Sony declare 15 stops of dynamic range
with this new sensor.

Why screw around with 61MP when 102MP is available?

https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/fujifilm_gfx100/

--
Regards,
Savageduck

On Jul 17, 2019, Incubus wrote
(in article ):

On 2019-07-17, Fred wrote:
In . com,
Alfred Molon wrote:

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/sony-alpha-a7r-iv---
world-s-first-61mp-full-frame-camera-33789

The interesting thing is that pixel size is approaching
m4/3 levels, yet Sony declare 15 stops of dynamic range
with this new sensor.

Alfred-

That is a rather extensive article. I may have missed it, but I
couldn't find whether the new body is compatible with my old
Sony/Minolta lenses.

I shoot Real Raw (TM).

https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/real-raw.htm

D

Are you helping the poor, struggling Rockwell family?

It seems that his satire web site is all that keeps him, and his kids from a
life on the streets with all his belongings in a shopping cart?

--
Regards,
Savageduck

On 17/07/2019 18:13, Savageduck wrote:
On Jul 16, 2019, Alfred Molon wrote
(in . com):

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/s...e-camera-33789

The interesting thing is that pixel size is approaching
m4/3 levels, yet Sony declare 15 stops of dynamic range
with this new sensor.

Why screw around with 61MP when 102MP is available?

https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/fujifilm_gfx100/

When I see those pixel counts I am reminded of Michael Palin's line in
the film Fierce Creatures: "How much more does he need?"

Yes I can see that it matters to a few applications, I still think that
most people would benefit from fewer pixels, and less noise, than they
have now even on APS-C.

Years ago I bought a G10 (for a wedding, to give me a hot shoe), it was
interesting to see that Canon dropped the pixel count for the G12.

On 7/17/19 1:13 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Jul 16, 2019, Alfred Molon wrote
(in . com):

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/s...e-camera-33789

The interesting thing is that pixel size is approaching
m4/3 levels, yet Sony declare 15 stops of dynamic range
with this new sensor.

Why screw around with 61MP when 102MP is available?

https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/fujifilm_gfx100/

According to that "satirical website", even 102Mp isn't as good as 35mm!

Maybe if it could mount my Canon FL-mount 1200mm lens...

--
Ken Hart

In article , Ken Hart
wrote:

Why screw around with 61MP when 102MP is available?

https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/fujifilm_gfx100/

According to that "satirical website", even 102Mp isn't as good as 35mm!

which is, of course, pure satire.

Maybe if it could mount my Canon FL-mount 1200mm lens...

it can.

On Jul 17, 2019, newshound wrote
(in articlep9qdnVamdvfnCbLAnZ2dnUU78cnNnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk):

On 17/07/2019 18:13, Savageduck wrote:
On Jul 16, 2019, Alfred Molon wrote
(in . com):

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/s...s-first-61mp-f
ull-frame-camera-33789

The interesting thing is that pixel size is approaching
m4/3 levels, yet Sony declare 15 stops of dynamic range
with this new sensor.

Why screw around with 61MP when 102MP is available?

https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/fujifilm_gfx100/
When I see those pixel counts I am reminded of Michael Palin's line in
the film Fierce Creatures: "How much more does he need?"

Yes I can see that it matters to a few applications, I still think that
most people would benefit from fewer pixels, and less noise, than they
have now even on APS-C.

Yup! That is why I have stuck with APS-C with my X-E3 & X-T3. All more than
enough for me. I just do not have the need for FF, or MF and a silly chase
after pixel count. If I were a pro with specific needs in a studio, or for
high end landscape photography, and a budget which could justify the cost,
then I would be looking at the GFX100.


Years ago I bought a G10 (for a wedding, to give me a hot shoe), it was
interesting to see that Canon dropped the pixel count for the G12.

I still have the G11 I bought some years ago. A great compact camera I would
not hesitate to recommend. However, I have not used it much lately since my
X-E2 & X-E3 have pretty much replaced it for my smaller camera needs. Now I
am thinking of having it converted for dedicated IR use.

--
Regards,
Savageduck